Talk:CryptoLogic
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Opening heading
[edit]The nature of this article was never intended to be one of advertising, thinly-veiled or otherwise. It's intention was to be an article detailing an accurate background of the company and how it has progressed over time with relevance to industry competitors, such as Playtech and Microgaming. I have seen articles on these companies but found them to be far too simple and, in my opinion, not comprehensive enough. All of the information is factual, objective and thoroughly researched. Please advise me more specifically in the areas where the article can be improved.ElNino77 12:26, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- I think even if it isn't advertisement, you'd still have a difficult time establishing notability. -Taco325i 18:29, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- Well, the problem is that all the information in the article comes directly from the company or its employees (presumably, since no sources were cited) and that's not neutral. The best way to fix this is to cite reliable sources such as reviews in business magazines, newspapers, etc. ColourBurst 23:37, 16 January 2007 (UTC)