Talk:Crosby system
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Does the "DSB" here stand for "Double-sideband transmission"? EVCM (talk) 05:45, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Interesting diagram of the Crosby system: http://home.computer.net/~pcara/docs/pcud0505.pdf EVCM (talk) 05:59, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Does anyone know, in what frequency range would the FM subcarrier for the Crosby system have been in? EVCM (talk) 06:04, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
Not NPOV
[edit]This article is strongly biased in favor of the Crosby system. Other than incompatibility with SCA, it says nothing about its major problems.
One problem is that it requires dematrixing. After the FM subcarrier is demodulated, it must be added to and subtracted from the main channel, to regenerate L and R. The Zenith/GE system permits a simple product-detection system that directly generates L and R.
Another problem is that the subcarrier is FM. (!!!) The Zenith/GE system's AM (actually DSBSC) subcarrier is notoriously subject to multipath distortion. Imagine how an FM signal would be disrupted -- unless you wanted to add several stages of wideband limiting. WilliamSommerwerck (talk) 02:50, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Crosby system. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080907101912/http://www.radioworld.com/reference-room/iboc/2006.04.20-06_rwrf_april_20_part_3.shtml to http://www.radioworld.com/reference-room/iboc/2006.04.20-06_rwrf_april_20_part_3.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:40, 21 March 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Crosby system. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20071020151042/http://www.americanheritage.com/articles/magazine/it/1990/1/1990_1_56_print.shtml to http://www.americanheritage.com/articles/magazine/it/1990/1/1990_1_56_print.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:16, 14 August 2017 (UTC)