User talk:EVCM

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, EVCM! I have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Chenzw Talk 13:53, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dick Randolph

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Dick Randolph, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.lpedia.org/Dick_Randolph. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:26, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rothbard pledge

A question for you here: Talk:Rothbard Caucus. TIA. --RayBirks (talk) 20:26, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Aldrich Hanssen (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

Further comments: checkuser block - Alison ^❤ 21:28, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block.

Proposed deletion of Miss Puzzle

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Miss Puzzle, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. MuZemike (talk) 15:54, 9 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Omniarchy

A tag has been placed on Omniarchy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Shicoco (talk) 15:46, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Omniarchy

A tag has been placed on Omniarchy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Shicoco (talk) 15:47, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Omniarchy

I have nominated Omniarchy, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omniarchy. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. —Largo Plazo (talk) 16:18, 12 October 2008 (UTC) —Largo Plazo (talk) 16:18, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Rogue's Island" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Rogue's Island. Since you had some involvement with the Rogue's Island redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:03, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WikiProject Libertarianism

Template:WikiProject Libertarianism has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf) 19:38, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]