Talk:Command & Conquer: The First Decade

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Command & Conquer: The First Decade article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find video game sources: "Command & Conquer: The First Decade" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Gilman Louie (1 participant)
Yoshimitsu (1 participant)
Dr. Wily (2 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (2 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Preston Arsement (4 participants)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (6 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (7 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Sole Survivor missing

The C&C1 spin-off Sole Survivor is missing on this compilation. Shouldn't this be mentioned? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 178.3.245.10 (talk) 23:05, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts

I'd like to know why my edits are being reverted. --Zeno McDohl 14:26, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

 Thats life and wikipedia for yeh! 
   Zerath13

Main Page

Could someone get this on C&C series I tried but I just get a red link. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamhaw (talk • contribs)

What page? --69.204.179.124 17:50, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

THe main Command and Conquer page but someones already done it.

Broken Link

The Map Editor for Command & Conquer: Red Alert not recognizing "The First Decade" disc as the appropriate one can be bypassed by adding -cd. to the command line. The bug in Command & Conquer concerning the crashes when units are placed on the top left corner of the screen can be worked around through a simple process hosted here.

The hosted link where Here is has stopped working. Maybe someone could discover what WAS there and post it in Wiki - Don't forget Forums Break, posts get locked and deleted.

Question about bugs in First Decade

Have they released a patch to fix any of the various glitches and problems? Did they fix the music and cutscenes?

That's not a stealth tank...

The one poster isn't a stealth tank. It's the medium tank of the GDI. I think it is called Predator as far as I remember.

That's definantly the GDI Predator tank, as evident from the demo. The upgrade for it is a rail gun, not a missle launcher.

Also

I don't know if this should be included, but the C&C modding community basically hates EA thanks to this product. And also it only sometimes works too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.235.152.211 (talk) 01:44, 27 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removed

Removed comment about Replacementdocs not working, tested just then and loaded fine, also, should have been on discussion page rather than front page Resonanttoe (talk) 01:37, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The official "The First Decade" forums link broken

Does anyone have a replacement link for the official The First Decade forum? that link to longer works -- it shows up with an error page on EA's website reading: "Error: you do not have permission to view the requested forum or category." I logged in just to be sure, but the error page still comes up. Cody-7 (talk) 23:50, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Added Info about the Unoffical 1.03 patch

The unofficial 1.03 patch is prominently advertised on the EA-run CommandAndConquer.com and Apoc (who seems to be an EA employee based on his comments about the C&C 3 development team) supports it. Although he doesn't speak for the company, the patch seems to be notable enough and I figured it really ought to be mentioned. So I updated the patches section and a few other areas to reflect that. I removed the bugs section because all of the remaining issues (except for the Lands of Lore II and Bladerunner preview videos in RA, I think) were fixed in the recent patch and it just seemed pointless to keep the section when every line ended "This has been fixed in..." So I took a few sentences from it and incorporated them into the patch section. And for the record, I for one am glad that all these issues are finally fixed, even if EA never was motivated enough to fix it themselves. At least they advertise it when somebody else actually does make the fixes. -Thunderforge (talk) 04:56, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Number of pages of the manual

It is mentioned in two separate places in the article that it is a 65-page and a 70-page manual. Which is true? See this and this.

--Dyaa (talk) 13:22, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Broken citation

I just noticed that citation number 2 (http://www.ea.com/official/cc/firstdecade/us/news.jsp?src=Patch102) is broken. It basically redirects to EA's main news page (at the moment, it redirects to this: http://www.ea.com/games/command-and-conquer-4). If someone could fix this, it would be great. -XJDHDR (talk) 22:27, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]