Talk:Colossal Order

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Finland Low‑importance

	Finland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Finland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FinlandWikipedia:WikiProject FinlandTemplate:WikiProject FinlandFinland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (7 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (3 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) -- Calidum 18:18, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Colossal Order (video game developer) → Colossal Order – I feel "Colossal Order" is unambiguous when fully capitalized; it seems unlikely that most people searching for "Colossal Order" rather than "colossal order" would be looking for giant order rather than this page. Menethh (talk) 23:18, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment is this company notable? There are no mentions of notability, and no references in this article. Two of the games also are missing mentions of notability, and are missing independent sourcing. Only "Cities: Skylines" actually is a reasonable article with independent sources and claims to notability. So... three of the articles (company, "Cities in Motion" games) could be deleted for failing WP:GNG, if only one game is notable, WP:NOTINHERITED for the developer. -- 65.94.171.225 (talk) 04:42, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Their games have had quite a bit of coverage; it is just that the articles currently fail to link to that coverage. As an example, Rock Paper Shotgun (considered a reliable source on gaming by Wikipedia) has nearly a dozen articles about Cities in Motion 1 or 2, and Metacritic lists 20 reviews for the first game and 15 for the second. Menethh (talk) 09:30, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose – this obscure company is not significant enough to warrant the unusual scheme of disambiguation by case alone. Dicklyon (talk) 03:42, 29 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The redir at Colossal Order should continue to point to giant order for now at least, while issues with these four articles (including but not just notability) are addressed. Revisit if and when this is resolved. Andrewa (talk) 04:58, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Colossal Order (company). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150307191817/http://www.colossalorder.fi/company.html to http://www.colossalorder.fi/company.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:08, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 1 November 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 11:43, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Colossal Order (company) → Colossal Order – Same reason as in the previous requested move above: "I feel "Colossal Order" is unambiguous when fully capitalized; it seems unlikely that most people searching for "Colossal Order" rather than "colossal order" would be looking for giant order rather than this page." Also, all wikilinks now redirect to a wrong article. 2001:14BA:9CE5:8400:9D09:DED6:A987:1FB6 (talk) 07:22, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment A large number of people (majority?) do not use capitalization in their searches. Forcing users to do so in order to generate desired results would be the internet equivalent of herding not only cats - but mice as well.Picard's Facepalm (talk) 13:19, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support as textbook case of WP:DIFFCAPS. Mdewman6 (talk) 16:02, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per WP:DIFFCAPS. The architectural term is not capitalized. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 09:40, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.