Talk:ClayFighter 63⅓
Relation to Earthworm Jim?
[edit]In the box at the bottom of the page, it says that this game is in the Earthworm Jim franchise. How so? The two SNES games aren't on the list. -The Hams 18:01, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
- I don't know whether I'd ever say that CF63 is part of the "canon" EWJ series, EWJ himself was in the game (making it an "Earthworm Jim video game"), while he was not in the two SNES games. - 76.105.67.208 15:58, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Editing
[edit]This article is in serious need of editing. It has poor grammar and doesn't read like an encyclopedia article. 68.59.157.132 23:13, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
-I quite agree. There is some information which is simply not true (an "insane combo" is any combo higher than 30, and they can go much higher than the number specified).
Reception
[edit]Shouldn't the critical reception of this game be mentioned? It stood as the lowest ranked game by NOM for many years, and they weren't the exception.Conwakolives (talk) 12:00, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on ClayFighter 63⅓. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130312192157/http://www.1up.com/news/interplay-announces-clayfighter-remake to http://www.1up.com/news/interplay-announces-clayfighter-remake
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:28, 11 January 2018 (UTC)