Talk:Citadel (video game)

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Atomas (0 participants)
PLAY: The Games Festival (1 participant)
FloodSim (1 participant)
Kunimitsu and Kunimitsu II (1 participant)
Blast Monkeys (0 participants)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (5 participants)
Purple Francis (8 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (4 participants)
Dr. Wily (10 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (3 participants; relisted)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Error or omission

I have a feeling that the credits for Citadel are either incorrect or incomplete. As I recall it, the programmer (and in those days this was almost always the designer as well) was a Scandinavian, and I don't remember the name Nigel Alderton at all. Unfortunately I don't currently have access to the game - could someone check this, please? Jon Rob 09:49, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. According to the in-game credits it's by one Michael Jakobsen, so I've changed the page accordingly. Nigel Alderton seems to be the programmer of Chuckie Egg: perhaps an editor pasted the template and forgot to change it? —Blotwell 07:30, 28 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Game terminating

The game will terminate if you have 99 points when you complete the game. You are left free to roam in order to get all the points available.

Tone warning

Problems with this article:

Use of second-person needs to be eliminated.
Few links
Not split up into sensible sections
No history

As an aside, I really need to complete it one of these days. Chris Cunningham 14:51, 16 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have tried to address the first two of these points. Alf Boggis 12:21, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Article's pretty decent now. Chris Cunningham 11:37, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Broken Link

The following link to the programmer's site for Citadel 2 was broken, so I've deleted it:

Citadel 2 website by the programmer

Jon Rob (talk) 13:22, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Citadel (Superior Software) loading screen.png

Image:Citadel (Superior Software) loading screen.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:26, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Citadel (Superior Software) title screen.png

Image:Citadel (Superior Software) title screen.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:28, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]