This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Constructed languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of constructed languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Constructed languagesWikipedia:WikiProject Constructed languagesTemplate:WikiProject Constructed languagesconstructed language articles
Since many of the logograms are compound, is “grapheme” too specific a word to use? E.g.: “The player is aided by a notebook that contains the list of graphemes the player has encountered up to that point,” – when two different logograms/words feature shared elements, I would expect “grapheme” to refer to each component of the logogram, not the compound logogram as a whole, but the character does not write down logogram parts in this way; only complete logograms. For example, the character does not write down determinatives on their own, only as they appear in complete logograms. But I'm no linguist and have zero standing to be making decisions of this nature. I welcome feedback from somebody with actual expertise. :)
_%22BIG_GOMEZ%22.svg)
