Talk:Burnout 3: Takedown

Burnout 3: Takedown has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 7, 2017. (Reviewed version).

Video games Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (6 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (2 participants)
Dr. Wily (6 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Preston Arsement (4 participants)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (6 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (7 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Untitled

Wikipedia is not a strategy guide or instruction manual. If you came to this page looking for tips, tricks, or cheat codes and did not find any, then the article is as it should be. Wikipedia articles are meant to focus on the games themselves, not on how to play them. That information is available elsewhere, in printed guides and online, and does not belong in an encyclopedia entry. Please do not add your own hints or opinions of the game.

Verifiable content regarding the history, design, and overall description of the game is welcome. If you have questions about whether or not specific information should be added, please post them here and sign your posts by adding ~~~~ at the end. Happy editing!

Minimum specs

Minimum specs, or a minimum specs link would be appreciated —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.206.65.120 (talk) 19:06, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This game is not even available for PC, and consoles don't have minimum specs. And yes, I know I'm replying to a nearly 4 year old comment. --- ☣ Hardstylehunt3r ^(talk)_(contribs) 16:33, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

USA Location

Is it right to say that the track Mountain Parkway is equivalent to United States in real life? Isn't it a bit redundant, since it's already set in US anyways? -- Steven 23:41, 5 February 2006 (UTC) yea. same for Alpine Expressway being Europe — Preceding unsigned comment added by The_Next_Biggish_Thing (talk • contribs) [reply]

Crash $

Is that section vandalism? It is taken straight out of the game. 78.156.109.166 (talk) 14:53, 29 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal

I propose to merge the article Burnout 3 soundtrack due to lack of notability with sources, the soundtrack also didn't have it own soundtrack release and could be easy merged in the main article with a collapsible table like Burnout Paradise. TheDeviantPro (talk) 07:08, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and Collapse - X201 (talk) 08:14, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It certainly shouldn't have a separate article. And per #14 of WP:VGSCOPE I don't think we should include a tracklisting on this article either as it isn't a subject of independent commentary. It should just be summarised under development that the game used licensed music. So I would say AfD or straight redirect. I have the same opinion about List of songs from Burnout Revenge and Burnout Legends as well. --The1337gamer (talk) 23:13, 25 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Burnout 3: Takedown/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TheSandDoctor (talk · contribs) 03:03, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Currently reviewing --TheSandDoctor (talk) 03:03, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Result: Based on my review of the article, I believe it to be of appropriate quality for Good Article status. The article is well written (criteria #1), verifiable with no original research (criteria #2), broad in coverage (criteria #3), neutral in tone (criteria #4), stable, and is illustrated by images where possible (criteria #5 and #6). The only concern that I do have the the cite kill present within it. With that said, I do not consider that a 'deal breaker' that would block a GA and will look into addressing it myself in a timely manner. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 04:32, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have addressed the citekill issue mentioned before by bundling the citations (WP:CITEBUNDLE). --TheSandDoctor (talk) 05:32, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

question

are the features from the demo release, such as car parts actually coming off during road rage, or the unsettling unused impact time sounds notable to be in the article? i feel they are but i need to hear a statement from someone else first 104.235.75.1 (talk) 07:06, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]