Talk:Brush (video games)

This page was proposed for deletion by TarkusAB (talk · contribs) on 19 March 2024.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

TheoTown (4 participants)
Redout (video game) (8 participants)
Old Grandma Hardcore (4 participants)
CarX Street (5 participants)
WePlay AniMajor (1 participant)
İstanbul Efsaneleri: Lale Savaşçıları (2 participants)
Zero Hour (video game) (3 participants; relisted)
VoxelStorm (1 participant; relisted)
Gilman Louie (4 participants; relisted)
Yoshimitsu (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

Sun Haven

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Computer graphics Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer graphics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer graphics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer graphicsWikipedia:WikiProject Computer graphicsTemplate:WikiProject Computer graphicscomputer graphics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Relevance

Brushes are just ways of defining geometry; they aren't particularly important. They certainly deserve a section in Binary space partitioning as the predominant method of authoring, but a whole page is pushing it. --Tom Edwards (talk) 00:16, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay with me; actually, it's probably a good idea. There's no way this article would ever make it past Start-status (if even that!). I should've done that in the first place... --DanielPharos (talk) 18:53, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@Tom Edwards: and @DanielPharos: This article has now been merged into Binary space partitioning. Harej (talk) 05:25, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently it didn't belong in that article after all... I've restored the content here. --DanielPharos (talk) 09:52, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]