Talk:Brandish (video game)

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Gilman Louie (1 participant)
Yoshimitsu (1 participant)
Dr. Wily (2 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (2 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Train simulator (disambiguation) (8 participants)
Preston Arsement (4 participants)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (6 participants; relisted)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (7 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Date

Anyoen have the release date for Brandish 3?--Claude 09:07, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Windows

When was the Windows version released? 2fort5r (talk) 13:46, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Niemti, what are you doing?

Why are you mindlessly reverting perfectly good edits without any explanation? Despatche (talk) 10:07, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The same thing I do every night, Despatche: trying to take over the world. --Niemti (talk) 11:44, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And if you want to be useful, write down the gameplay, plot and a list of characters (with their short descriptions and VAs), also expand on the reception if you can find additional sources, and maybe make an article about the series if you want. --Niemti (talk) 16:57, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that's an appropriate answer to a request for an explanation of your reverts. Could you please elaborate? Huon (talk) 18:12, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The sneak "minor edit" set mi in the mood (but also motivated me to take care of the article at last). --Niemti (talk) 18:44, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, a bunch of clerical changes are so sneaky. No, what's really sneaky is reverting my edits, then stealing them for yourself. Despatche (talk) 03:39, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

About your Third Opinion request: I am a regular volunteer at the 3O project. Your request for a Third Opinion has been removed for failure to satisfy the requirement that disputes be thoroughly discussed and come to a standstill before requesting dispute resolution. You may reapply for a Third Opinion if that should occur. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 13:24, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm stealing your edits and selling them on black market. --Niemti (talk) 13:36, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brandish (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140227195133/http://www.siliconera.com/2009/05/12/delving-into-brandish-the-dark-revenant/ to http://www.siliconera.com/2009/05/12/delving-into-brandish-the-dark-revenant/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:45, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 16 March 2018

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. I have enacted the page moves suggested and agreed upon by opposers below. (non-admin closure) TheSandDoctor ^Talk 17:05, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Brandish (video game) → Brandish – Clear primary topic, page view wise, where it eclipses the other articles with the name. "Brandish" is already a redirect here. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 09:04, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - primary topic is the alternate word for Brandishing. Move Brandish (disambiguation) > Brandish and merge Brandishing there. -- Netoholic @ 02:38, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- @Netoholic: The architectural element cannot be called "brandish", as it is solely referred to by "brandishing". The criminal term is also usually referred to as "brandishing" but not "brandish". It's clear the word doesn't apply to either of the disambiguated articles, so it cannot be a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 09:27, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Change per Netoholic above. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:17, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Agree with Necrothesp - Netoholic's solution is the best solution. –Davey2010^Talk 19:17, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.