Talk:Bow-wow theory

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophy of language

Anthropology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics / Philosophy of language Low‑importance

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.
	This article is supported by Philosophy of language task force.

Proposed move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Propaniac (talk) 20:34, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bow-wow theory (origin of language) → Bow-wow theory — proper title format. No need for parenthetical title. Greg Bard (talk) 00:06, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Support. There is no other bow-wow theory, so there's no need to disambiguate. Andrewa (talk) 12:24, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support. This should be uncontroversial.Iota (talk) 17:21, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No objection, but please leave a redirect since the page was requested, with this title, at WP:Requested articles. Cnilep (talk) 18:33, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Agree, and it certainly doesn't hurt to request this specifically, but neither should it be necessary. This redirect is created automatically by the move, and shouldn't be deleted unless a case is made at WP:RFD. See Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion#When should we delete a redirect?, and tell me if this isn't being followed, because it's important. No change of vote. Andrewa (talk) 19:25, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.