Talk:Boston Common
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Boston Common article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Unnecessary move?
[edit]This article has been renamed from Boston Common (park) to Boston Common as the result of a move request.
- The following is a closed discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was - restore to original name as primary topic. Keith D (talk) 17:11, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
Why was this page moved from Boston Common to Boston Common (park)? The park is very clearly the primary meaning of "Boston Common"; the disambiguation page should be at Boston Common (disambiguation). Compare Central Park and Central Park (disambiguation). Does anybody disagree with me? AJD (talk) 16:13, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Not in the least. The current title is a redundancy, on a similar level to saying "Broadway (street)". I support a return to the previous title. Best wishes, Hertz1888 (talk) 16:42, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Other meanings are clearly secondary to this one. This move should be reversed. --Polaron | Talk 23:00, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
- Support move back to Boston Common. Clearly the primary meaning. Andrewa (talk) 00:17, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- Support. While we use primary for "overwhelmingly most common", this is also true. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 05:04, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
- Support, unquestionably the primary topic for this title. older ≠ wiser 18:35, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Brimmer & May?
[edit]What about the annual brimmer and may frog pond skating event? shouldt that at least be noted, so that people wont come on the day and be like "aw man! it got reserved for a school!? we drve 2 and a half hours just to come tonight, and i can only make it tonight!"?Igglybuff63 (talk) 23:13, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
hectare
[edit]The land area given as 200,000 m2 reads very oddly to non-US readers. The usual unit of measurement for land area in metric countries is the hectare, which is 104 m2, or an area equivalent to 100m by 100m. (See p 124 in the English "brochure" downloaded from http://www.bipm.org/en/si/si_brochure/general.html.) The hectare is easy to visualize (as 100m is an easily-walked distance) and is commonly used in real estate, media reports of wildfires etc. I did go looking in the Wikipedia style guide on this point, but found nothing. 118.209.201.36 (talk) 04:28, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
- Done Easily fixed—and it is. Suggestion appreciated. Hertz1888 (talk) 04:53, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
Picture of Ann Hibbens
[edit]I would like to remove the picture of Ann Hibbens from this article. Despite what the title of the picture says, she was almost certainly NOT hanged on Boston Common. In early colonial Boston, the common was a public place where elections and other events took place. It was not a place of execution. Hangings took place on Boston Neck, about a mile south of the Common. This is where the Quaker martyrs were hanged, and certainly where Hibbens and criminals were hanged. The area south of the Boston Neck gallows was known as "common land" and this may have been what confused many writers as to the location of the gallows. See the article here. Sarnold17 (talk) 01:10, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
Tragedy of the Commons
[edit]The Tragedy of the Commons implies that commons, which have worked since the dawn of civilization, cannot possibly work. In this article I read:
"During the 1630s, it was used by many families as a cow pasture. However, this only lasted for a few years, as affluent families bought additional cows, which led to overgrazing, a real-life example of the Tragedy of the commons.[8] After grazing was limited in 1646 to 70 cows at a time,[9] the Boston Common continued to host cows until they were formally banned from it in 1830 by Mayor Harrison Gray Otis.[10]"
So there was a problem in the first 6-15 years, and after that 184 years of successful cattle grazing. Yet that proves an article saying it should be a failure?
One of the main objections to the Tragedy of the Commons is that it ignores local control. Local control is exactly what allowed 2 centuries of successful grazing on the common, yet this is an example of the essay being correct?--Skintigh (talk) 16:33, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Boston Common. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080309205045/http://www.lifeisgood.com:80/festivals/past-festivals.aspx to http://www.lifeisgood.com/festivals/past-festivals.aspx
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120112160526/http://emuseum.nyhistory.org:8080/emuseum/view/objects/asitem/id/37115 to http://emuseum.nyhistory.org:8080/emuseum/view/objects/asitem/id/37115
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to https://www.cityofboston.gov/images_documents/Boston_Common_Study_Report_4_tcm3-32547.pdf,
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:02, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Boston Common. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120401155612/http://www.unionclub.org/history.html to http://www.unionclub.org/history.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080604022908/http://www.thebostonchannel.com/news/14009823/detail.html to http://www.thebostonchannel.com/news/14009823/detail.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:50, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Navigation template
[edit]I've created Template:Boston Common and invite others to improve. Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 04:10, 20 October 2019 (UTC)
Lede
[edit]In listing the streets by which the Common is bound, Tremont St is followed by a parenthetical ‘139 Tremont St’. That is the address of the visitor center. Its relevance to the list of bounding streets is lost on me. I’m deleting the parenthetical. Irish Melkite (talk) 07:21, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
- B-Class National Register of Historic Places articles
- High-importance National Register of Historic Places articles
- B-Class National Register of Historic Places articles of High-importance
- B-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- B-Class Massachusetts articles
- Mid-importance Massachusetts articles
- WikiProject Massachusetts articles
- B-Class Boston articles
- Mid-importance Boston articles
- WikiProject Boston articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- B-Class Protected areas articles
- Mid-importance Protected areas articles
- Articles of WikiProject Protected areas
- B-Class Urban studies and planning articles
- Low-importance Urban studies and planning articles