Talk:Blue Wing Blitz
 | Blue Wing Blitz has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Reception section
[edit]If someone has any information to add to the Reception section, please do. I've searched all over the English and Japanese web and have found literally nothing apart from a GameFAQs submitted-review and a Jap fansite review that can't be used. :( Kariteh 12:13, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Good Article Review - On Hold
[edit]I'm glad to say the current content is great, and well referenced. However, there needs to be some more Critical reception, as the current one sentence sales figure is not comprehensive enough. How about some reviews from IGN, or any other Game reviewer? Some news about the game's influence? Technical features? I've never heard of the system, so talking about that would be nice. See articles like Final Fantasy X and Final Fantasy VII for more reference on how to model it. If the requests I have outlined are not addressed within 7 days, the article can be failed at any time, without any notice. Regards, NSR77 TC 21:36, 26 July 2007 (UTC)
- Information about the game is very scarce; I've addressed the issues as much as I could. Kariteh 09:06, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
- I feel it now meets the Good Article Criteria. I have, therefore, passed this GAN. NSR77 TC 18:58, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on Blue Wing Blitz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20020211221730/http://thegia.com/wsc/bwb/bwb.html to http://www.thegia.com/wsc/bwb/bwb.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.playonline.com/WS_web/n_flash/bwb/bat_adv.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.playonline.com/WS_web/n_flash/bwb/cust_01.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.playonline.com/WS_web/n_flash/bwb/story_body.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.playonline.com/WS_web/n_flash/bwb/chara_main.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20020328092805/http://thegia.com/news/0103/n08b.html to http://www.thegia.com/news/0103/n08b.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.1up.com/do/feature?pager.offset=1&cId=3154581
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.playonline.com/WS_web/n_flash/bwb/index.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:47, 22 July 2017 (UTC)