Talk:Blood Money (video game)
Blood Money (video game) has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: November 3, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
A fact from Blood Money (video game) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 November 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Fair use rationale for Image:Blood money box cover.jpg
[edit]Image:Blood money box cover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 23:47, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Bloodmoneyscreenshot3.gif
[edit]Image:Bloodmoneyscreenshot3.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 18:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Blood Money (video game)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 16:39, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
I think I know this game... JAGUAR 16:39, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Initial comments
[edit]- It might be worth mentioning that this game is a shooter in the opening sentence of the lead
- As per last time, can the gameplay section mention a bit more (if possible)? For example, do players start with three lives and continue once they reach a game over? A small sentence or two on that would be great, but if not, don't worry. I understand it's difficult writing these 1980s games with scarce information!
- "The game's cover art was designed by British artist Peter Andrew Jones for the novel Protector" - does this mean the cover art was inspired by the novel?
- "and Barrett of ST/Amiga Format wrote that the game" - Barrett has already been mentioned, so no need to cite the magazine he works for
Close - promoted
[edit]I couldn't find any reason to put this on hold as all of the above were minor. The references check out fine too. Nice work on this! JAGUAR 16:55, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks, Jaguar! I fixed most of your concerns. I appreciate them—I always value your suggestions. – Rhain1999 (talk to me) 07:19, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Blood Money (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://amigareviews.classicgaming.gamespy.com/bloodmon.htm
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://amigareviews.classicgaming.gamespy.com/bloodmon.htm
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://amigareviews.classicgaming.gamespy.com/bloodmon.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:31, 29 March 2016 (UTC)