Jump to content

Talk:Bisu (gamer)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fair use rationale for Image:Ce52vBQWE3U.jpg

[edit]

Image:Ce52vBQWE3U.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 20:14, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy parapgraph

[edit]

I deleted the paragraph on the alleged cheating controversy over the game Hwasin vs Bisu on 21st July 07. Simply put, there was no controversy. A popular amateur commentator who publishes his commentaries on YouTube called Bisu a cheater over that game which made many of his viewers believe Bisu's move was controversial. His probe move is 100% legal. The Kespa referees did not "rule the move legal", they didn't even argue about it. The commentator ("Klazart") himself said he was carried away by emotion as a Starcraft fan when he made the statement about Bisu. This WP entry, the original Youtube source and Klazart's statement are the only references I could digg up over this alleged controversy, thus the delete.

The original: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iMSV4BhkXTA Klazart's statement afterwards: http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?id=55360

Consequent player names.

[edit]

I think this section could be improved by using the player names in a more consequent way. Sometimes they are referred to as their real Korean names and sometimes by their player names. Probably both should be mentioned, since most foreign (non-korean in this context) fans know players only by their nicknames. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.95.233.135 (talk) 17:51, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 14 external links on Kim Taek-yong. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:49, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]