Talk:Battlefield: Bad Company 2
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battlefield: Bad Company 2 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find video game sources: "Battlefield: Bad Company 2" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
| Archives: 1 |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Plot
[edit]Why is there no plot section anymore? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.106.73.78 (talk) 20:35, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
- because the first one was way too descriptive. someone needs to put in a good plot with out it going overboard. LtFury♣(talk) 20:53, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
- Just to say, the plot section now is incorrect in multiple places, such as the later parts of the section as Haggard names the craft as the Mirya after the weapon has been fired, and the continuous naming of the SCALAR WEAPON (it's real name) as the 'Aurora Weapon.' --62.189.175.212 (talk) 15:22, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
- We need to mention the lack of continuity as far as gold is concerned. In BC2, it's as if they never stole it in the first game. No explanation, nothing. That, in my opinion, is even worse than level design in the single player mode. Sol505000 (talk) 11:44, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
- Unless a reliable source has commented on it, we really can't speculate about plot holes. -- ferret (talk) 12:20, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
Re-mastered version
[edit]https://www.newsweek.com/battlefield-5-consider-free-battle-royale-bad-company-2-remaster-1096553
Majinsnake (talk) 06:59, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Dice Question
[edit]I think a great addition to the Reception section would be when Dice asked why everyone liked Battlefield Bad Company: 2 <https://www.destructoid.com/stories/dice-isn-t-sure-why-fans-like-battlefield-bad-company-so-much-277069.phtml></>. I've had trouble with the writing and would appreciate if some made the change, thanks! Anoneemouse120432 (talk) 13:36, 18 May 2021 (UTC)Anoneemouse120432
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:39, 21 May 2023 (UTC)