Talk:Batman: Anarky
Batman: Anarky was one of the Language and literature good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Batman: Anarky/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
==Start rating==
I put it at Start, but it still needs citing. MwNNrules (talk) 16:51, 29 January 2008 (UTC) ==GA rating== Now GA rated, after successful Good Article nomination. --Cast (talk) 22:44, 1 November 2008 (UTC) |
Last edited at 22:44, 1 November 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 09:06, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Batman: Anarky. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080111202354/http://www.2000adreview.co.uk/features/interviews/2005/grant/grant1.shtml to http://www.2000adreview.co.uk/features/interviews/2005/grant/grant1.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:28, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
GA concerns
[edit]After reviewing the article, I am concerned that this article no longer meets the GA criteria. Some of my concerns are listed below:
- There is some uncited text
- The "Reception" is very disorganised and needs to be reduced.
Is anyone interested in fixing up the article? Z1720 (talk) 01:55, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
GA Reassessment
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Delisted. Hog Farm Talk 01:29, 30 August 2024 (UTC)
There is uncited text throughout the article, and the reception section is too long and disorganised. Z1720 (talk) 02:11, 19 August 2024 (UTC)
- Oof aye, this article has problems, definitely major enough that I don't think they can be easily fixed. The reception section, aside from being too long, consists largely of very confusing and contextless block quotes. The "themes" section might as well be written off as original research, as it is almost entirely cited to the comic itself, so it appears as though this is the editors own interpretations of the comic. It is severely lacking in citations to reliable, secondary sources, citing only a hand full. And as the nominator said, a lot of the text is entirely uncited, in sections you'd expect to be fully sourced. This is definitely a delist from me. --Grnrchst (talk) 09:39, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- A lot of the "unsourced" bits aren't really unsourced. Here's an example:
Cam Smith, Ray McCarthy, and Josef Rubinstein completed the ink work for "Anarky: Tomorrow Belongs to Us", "Anarky", and "Metamorphosis, respectively.
That might be false, but it's not unsourced - the front of each issue will say who inked it. If there are other parts that are a problem, can you point them out specifically? I've only just skimmed it, but it's things like that that I found, so they're fine. - I removed the disorganized part of the reception section and it already looks way better. I haven't followed up with any of those sources though, nor have I checked to see if there are major omissions in that section. -- asilvering (talk) 23:46, 20 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Asilvering: I have added cn tags to the article. If the article is citing the comic as its source, it will need an inline citation (with the exception of the comic's plot summary). I agree with Grnchst above that the Themes section should not be citing the comic, but rather what secondary sources have said about the comic. Z1720 (talk) 00:35, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delist for breadth. Biggest issue for me is the Themes section based on primary sources. It's synthetic/original research to say that those primary source mentions constitute a theme. We need secondary source analysis to warrant those conclusions. czar 22:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Sources that could be useful to fix up some of this:
- Klaehn, Jeffery (1 July 2020). "An interview with Alan Grant". Studies in Comics. 11 (1): 193–204. doi:10.1386/jem_00021_7.
- Berns, Fernando Gabriel Pagnoni; Veteri, Eduardo (2023). "Batman, Defender of the Status Quo?: On Anarchy and Anarky (Guest Villain: The Ventriloquist)". In Favaro, Marco; Martin, Justin F. (eds.). Batman's villains and villainesses: multidisciplinary perspectives on Arkham's souls. Lanham: Lexington Books. ISBN 1-66693-083-0.
asilvering (talk) 21:02, 22 August 2024 (UTC)
- Asilvering do you intend to continue working on this article? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:48, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- No. -- asilvering (talk) 17:34, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Asilvering do you intend to continue working on this article? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:48, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
- Delisted good articles
- B-Class Atheism articles
- Low-importance Atheism articles
- B-Class Comics articles
- Low-importance Comics articles
- B-Class Comics articles of Low-importance
- B-Class United States comics articles
- United States comics work group articles
- B-Class DC Comics articles
- DC Comics work group articles
- B-Class Batman articles
- Batman work group articles
- WikiProject Comics articles
- B-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- B-Class philosophical literature articles
- Low-importance philosophical literature articles
- Philosophical literature task force articles
- B-Class Contemporary philosophy articles
- Low-importance Contemporary philosophy articles
- Contemporary philosophy task force articles
- B-Class science fiction articles
- Low-importance science fiction articles
- WikiProject Science Fiction articles
- B-Class anarchism articles
- WikiProject Anarchism articles