Jump to content

Talk:Barret Wallace

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleBarret Wallace has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 20, 2009Good article nomineeListed

Image of new AC design

[edit]

I think it's entirely warranted that a picture of Barret's FF7AC design be included. Not only is it discussed critically throughout the article, it would be freakin' awesome. Axem Titanium (talk) 15:06, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, the only reason I didn't add it though was because through google search I wasn't able to find a really good shot of it (I was aiming for the poster of him standing facing the viewer, which shows the design in fully). Even the Reunion file has it partially covered with text. :\--Kung Fu Man (talk) 17:43, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"Freaking cool"-ness aside, there's decent rationale for it to be the page's second-image. Find one, and you're good to go, I think.Luminum (talk) 19:54, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Article title

[edit]

Is "Barrett Wallace" really the WP:COMMONNAME for this character? I personally did not know that was his last name until coming across the article - I don't believe he's usually referred to by his full name. It seems like "Barret (character)" or "Barrett (Final Fantasy)" would be more in line with Wikipedia article titling. Thoughts? Sergecross73 msg me 14:30, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A very belated reply, but: I think the title is appropriate because fictional characters are better disambiguated with their in-universe full name than the name of the work, even if their full name is fairly obscure (I'm not sure "Wallace" ever appears in the original game, outside the manual). That's why Linus van Pelt is an article title whereas Linus (Peanuts) is a redirect. —Kodiologist (t) 14:43, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Barret Wallace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:53, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Barret Wallace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:39, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Barret Wallace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:50, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]