Talk:Bahrain–Israel normalization agreement

Bahrain Mid‑importance

	Bahrain portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bahrain, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Kingdom of Bahrain on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BahrainWikipedia:WikiProject BahrainTemplate:WikiProject BahrainBahrain articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Israel Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Project Israel To Do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Assess : Rate the Unassessed Israel-related articles and Unknown-importance Israel-related articles.
Cleanup : Cleanup listing for this project is available. See also the list by category and the tool's wiki page.
Collaborate : Participate in WikiProject Israel Palestine Collaboration.
Copyedit : Timeline of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict in 2005
Deletion sorting : Participate in discussions at WikiProject Deletion sorting/Israel.
Expand : Ayala Procaccia, Diamond industry in Israel, Edna Arbel, Levin Kipnis, Rami Kleinstein, Sephardic Haredim, Zman Tel Aviv, Nachum Heiman, Public Defence (Israel), Prisoner of Zion, Trial of Benjamin Netanyahu, Day to Mark the Departure and Expulsion of Jews from the Arab Countries and Iran, Pre-Modern Aliyah
See also Articles needing translation from Hebrew Wikipedia.
Geographical coordinates : Add geographic coordinates to Israel articles missing geocoordinate data.
Infobox : Add infoboxes to Israel articles needing infoboxes.
Maintain : See Israel articles needing attention.
Map : See discussion at Module:Location map/data/Israel. Add maps to articles in Wikipedia requested maps in Israel.
NPOV : Jewish exodus from Arab and Muslim countries
Photo : Add pictures to articles in Wikipedia requested photographs in Israel.
Stubs : See Israel stubs.
Update : Basic Law proposal: Israel as the Nation-State of the Jewish People
Other :
- Translate to Hebrew : David Bar-Hayim, Guy Bavli, and Guy Oseary.

United States: Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

International relations: Law Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject International law (assessed as Low-importance).

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. Parts of this article relate to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing the parts of the page related to the contentious topic:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

If it is unclear which parts of the page are related to this contentious topic, the content in question should be marked within the wiki text by an invisible comment. If no comment is present, please ask an administrator for assistance. If in doubt it is better to assume that the content is covered.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

Requested move 11 September 2020

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 00:45, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bahrain–Israel peace agreement → Bahain-Israel normalization agreement – There isn't really many RS calling it a peace agreement (not including Trump himself), not to mention it isn't actually a peace agreement. In contrast, most RS are referring to it as the normalization of relations, not to mention that is the actual accurate title. See 1 "landmark deal to fully normalise their relations", 2 "announces deal between Bahrain, Israel to normalize relations", 3 "Bahrain has joined the United Arab Emirates in striking an agreement to normalize relations with Israel", 4 "Bahrain Will Normalize Relations With Israel", and 5 5 "Bahrain has become the latest Arab nation to agree to normalize ties with Israel" among what I am sure are many others. Changed to Bahain-Israel normalization agreement as per WP:CONCISE Zoozaz1 (talk) 18:35, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support: I agree with you that it is not a peace agreement or treaty because the two countries have not fought in the past.--Sakiv (talk) 18:36, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support: for the same reasons applicable to the UAE; it cannot be a peace agreement if there was never a state of conflict, and in fact Israel and Bahrain have had an undisclosed friendly relationship since at least Israeli prime minister Shimon Peres's visit in the 1990s. It is factually a normalization agreement, no matter what spin is put on it. --Telecart (talk) 19:53, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support: As others have said, it can't be a "peace agreement" if there was no prior state of conflict. Bahrain and many other Gulf states (including Saudi Arabia) already have a close back door relationship with Israel.--HadesTheEldest (talk) 20:59, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support: There was no state of war, declared or otherwise, to end, and so this cannot be a peace agreement. It's simply going from a state of no relation, to normal relations. Think of a new country, that starts to form relations with other nations - it might be "recognized", it might sign agreements regulating trade and diplomatic relations. But those would certainly not be peace agreements. okedem (talk) 23:31, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Since there was no war, then this makes sense. I'm not that knowledgable in Wiki policies but does this count as WP:SNOW? Sixula (talk) 00:25, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Not a peace agreement and RS are mostly not calling it that. This is not much different to the UAE case, where although there might not be entire agreement on what precisely to call it, there is little support for calling it a peace agreement. Nor is there is an "alternative" name to muddy up the waters in this case so yea, I think this is likely SNOW. It's just an agreement to establish diplomatic relations and would not even be a major news item were it not for the Israel Palestine situation.Selfstudier (talk) 11:04, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support but moved to Bahrain–Israel normalization agreement because original move request were likely a typo and violates en-dash. My argument is likely same as others. 180.249.244.242 (talk) 14:23, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support: As I said on the Talk:Israel–United Arab Emirates peace agreement, THIS IS NOT A PEACE AGREEMENT. That is just the way the media portrays it. What does diplomatic relations have to do with peace? Thepharoah17 (talk) 16:18, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support: It is not a peace agreement or treaty because the two countries were not in a state of war, either formally or de facto. Trying to reconnect (talk) 18:14, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 28 October 2020: Relevant Articles, Categories and Templates

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In the "See also" section there should be a link to the articles:

The following relevant categories of the article should include:

2020 in the United States

The following template should be at the bottom of the article:

72.229.44.69 (talk) 16:59, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Partly done: Abraham Accords is already wikilinked in the body of the article, so it is unnecessary to add it to the see also section. September 2020 events in the United States is already a subcategory of 2020 in the United States. Dylsss^{(talk • contribs)} 01:50, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 11 December 2020

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Include Israel–Morocco normalization agreement in the "See Also" section. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:12, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done, those most of these links are already in the template, I would propose just to remove the section.--Ymblanter (talk) 18:20, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 12 October 2023

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Change Ireland to "No public position" until a source is given. The map shows Ireland with yellow (Neutral/Ambiguous) despite providing no source. Frojas798 (talk) 14:18, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done – it could take up to several hours for the article to notice that the image has been updated. Tollens (talk) 10:47, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like the image was correctly modified if I click on it and zoom but the article itself at first glance still has Ireland in yellow. I wonder if it's a bug or something else has to be changed. Frojas798 (talk) 22:09, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]