User talk:Telecart

ZZZzzz

The NESS topic was NOT an ad!

A detailed information is what wikipedia is all about, at best. I would like to say that the ad note is one of the most idiotic things I've ever seen in the past few month. Good job!

NESS... it's ok

It's ok, I have nothing to do with NESS, it's really sad to see something ripped to peices into a lame 2 line topic... and why on earth was the logo deleted? Thedp 11:11, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Comikaza for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Comikaza is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Comikaza until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creep^Talk 21:28, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Hello Telecart. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Comikaza, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Telecart. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Telecart|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. scope_creep^Talk 19:02, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Coolio. Thanks. scope_creep^Talk 19:38, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:scope_creep I solemnly swear I do not, will not, and have not received any compensation or consideration thereof for my edits. You're completely off the mark. I'm part of a Comics entry-writing and quality-improvement blitz in the Hebrew wiki. As part of that campaign I wrote the article in question for he.wiki and decided it was noteworthy enough to translate to English. I'm defending it here because I truly believe it is notable, certainly more so than most comic book store entries in en.wiki community. --Telecart (talk) 19:44, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's cool @Telecart: You didn't need to do that, although it is very honourable. Thanks. scope_creep^Talk 20:02, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, I was kind of taken aback by the insinuation @Scope creep:. To remove any lingering doubt, here are some of my recent entries in the comics blitz, if you can figure out the history button you can see I created them all 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,and major edits on many others. You should be able to see my history for he.wiki here. --Telecart (talk) 21:24, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Telecart: You should be able to quickly copy your comments into the bottom on that Afd, if you want. Add a good rationale why you think it is notable. scope_creep^Talk 22:17, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Scope creep: done, thanks. We need to adopt this ping thing in he.wiki, heh.

		The Article Rescue Barnstar
		The Rescue Barnstar is bestowed upon you for creating, developing, then rescuing the Comikaza article through patience, dedication, and solid arguments! יישר כוח! gidonb (talk) 00:57, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Hey, Telecart, you can't edit anything at Talk:Zionism yet. Valereee (talk) 21:23, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder, This is OK and

This isn't

Edit requests only, nothing more, thanks. Selfstudier (talk) 17:14, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]