Talk:Armageddon (MUD)

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (6 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (2 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Armageddon MUD Fansite

Discussion regarding inclusion of 'Armageddon MUD Fansite' on page. User Chaos5023 argues that page does not meet criteria due to WP:ELMAYBE #11. Armageddon MUD Fansite is written by a staff member (as expressed in correspondence) and contains criteria that meets WP:ELYES #3 (amount of detail) and WP:ELMAYBE #4 possibly as well.68.80.95.140 (talk) 22:06, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree with Chaos5023 though, I can't see any good reason to add this particular site. Currently the site itself stays it is still under construction and the information it contains is actually rather limited. There cases in which you might argue for adding of a fan site under external links, but this one doesn't seem to be it. Also I find it hard to imagine that this site is the best/most informative fansite/website on the game out there.--Kmhkmh (talk) 02:21, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Armageddon MUD Discussion Board

The complaints referenced on the linked Armageddon Discussion Board have been added as a significant counter-point, which I feel is necessary for a Wikipedia article to remain unbiased. The conversations which occur on this shadowboard are provably related to and influential of Armageddon; because of this, I believe that it should be noted on the MUD's wikipedia page. Asanadas (talk) 03:55, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re-added this segment of the wiki page with some wording changes to satisfy the individual who removed it. To that individual, I recommend that they read Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view and endeavor to apply the concepts to this page as well. Asanadas (talk) 08:22, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]