Talk:Amazon Prime Video

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Amazon Prime Video article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 3 months

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Amazon Prime Video. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Amazon Prime Video at the Reference desk.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Television Mid‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Media High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mackay Radio
Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Websites: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Websites, an attempt to create and link together articles about the major websites on the web. To participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.WebsitesWikipedia:WikiProject WebsitesTemplate:WikiProject WebsitesWebsites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Apps High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Apps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of apps on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AppsWikipedia:WikiProject AppsTemplate:WikiProject Appsapps articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Contribute to the project:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Good article nominations : Improve Application software, Facebook and Instagram to good article status
Stubs : Category:Mobile game stubs, Category:Stub-Class apps articles

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[The Lord of the Rings#Television|The Lord of the Rings]] The anchor (#Television) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Requested move 27 April 2021

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved as proposed. There was some opposition, stating that "Prime Video" was the correct name and more concise, but overall there is a rough evidenced consensus amongst those in the discussion that "Amazon Prime Video" is both the common name, and more recognizable, satisfying WP:CRITERIA. — Amakuru (talk) 12:45, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Prime Video → Amazon Prime Video – Even though "Amazon" is not in the official logo for the service, whenever the service is mentioned, people usually just refer to it by saying "Amazon Prime" or simply "Amazon". Obviously neither of those phrases can be the title of this article, but "Amazon Prime Video" encompasses everything needed for the name of the streaming service, especially "Amazon". JE98 (talk) 04:06, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Wikipedians' obsession with arbitrary corporate branding of encyclopedia articles. There is no other reason, and there is no problem. As the nominator said, it is already WP:NATURAL and it is in fact already WP:COMMON. The nominator provided no proof at all that there is any problem or even any reason, and "people" most definitely do not use the name of a membership and shipping service to refer to streaming video. This is a wrong solution in search of a problem. — Smuckola (talk) 19:33, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

*Support a move to Amazon Prime, as I think that's the common-name. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 08:10, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

- Do you mean Amazon Prime Video? Amazon Prime is already an article on a related but different topic. BilCat (talk) 08:16, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, right - ignore that then! Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 10:00, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. Clear common name. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:50, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support as common name. For example, putting "Prime Video" in Google News shows "Amazon Prime Video" far more often than not. It's obvious in the real world that "Prime Video" is simply not recognizable enough per WP:CRITERIA. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 19:28, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support - It's notable as "Amazon Prime Video" so I largely support this discussion about moving it. Dot (talk) 05:40, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Per Smuckola. For an example of industry usage of "Prime Video", see here. BilCat (talk) 02:03, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- One single reliable source using the term isn't demonstration of it as a the WP:COMMONNAME, a big sample of reliable sources is necessary to assess which one is the common name. —El Millo (talk) 02:36, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - One is greater than zero. BilCat (talk) 03:22, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    - Surely if you consider the argument in support of the move is poor, you shouldn't just put forth an argument almost equally poor in opposition to it. —El Millo (talk) 03:37, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      - I didn't. I merely gave an example. BilCat (talk) 03:54, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
        This example is unhelpful. The headline starts with Amazon, and the article starts with Amazon. Of course it's dropped in this case. Variety writes "Amazon Prime Video" here and here and here. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 16:57, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
That's what I've seen on The Hollywood Reporter and Deadline articles as well. They use "Amazon Prime Video" as some sort of full name, then simply call it "Prime Video" for short. —El Millo (talk) 17:01, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- "Amazon Prime Video" isnt a full name or any sort of name; Prime Video is the only name (WP:NATURAL), and "Amazon" on the front is simply the brand like a redundant adjective. It's not even an Amazon variety of Prime Video, like a granny smith apple, as there is no variety or ambiguity. It's just compulsory branding which is journalistic but unencyclopedic. They are simply giving a basic language modifier, not actually magically renaming it, and there couldn’t be a reason to do so. I know you already know that as per your original comment; I’m just clarifying your verbiage for the group because almost everybody here impulsively misunderstands that in addition to total failure to prove the proposal in the first place, including Erik misunderstanding your example. Your example, the only example, also demonstrates WP:COMMON and common sense. — Smuckola (talk) 18:19, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thank you for agreeing with us about WP:NATURAL, which says, "Using an alternative name that the subject is also commonly called in English reliable sources, albeit not as commonly as the preferred-but-ambiguous title." You are saying that "Amazon Prime Video" is being used in reliable sources frequently, and we concur with that. And guess what! Android users see Amazon Prime Video, and Apple users see Amazon Prime Video. It's almost as if journalists and companies agree that just "Prime Video" isn't clear enough text to be recognizable. Will you be digging in further? Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 22:50, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    - With this bad faith twisted mind game, and theatrically willful misunderstanding and projecting of the words of other people, you forfeit the discussion. — Smuckola (talk) 21:31, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Prime video 96.225.40.96 (talk) 00:30, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]