Jump to content

Talk:Aero-Cross

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Aero-Cross/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 13:47, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Will be reviewing this article as part of the GAN Backlog Drive of April to May 2020. MWright96 (talk) 13:47, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Lead

[edit]
  • "and the third game released under the Namco Generations series of video game remakes." - think the first mention of "game" can be deleted from this sentence
  • "The game was announced in October 2010 and was announced as being cancelled in December 2012 following a lack of updates on its production." - try to change this sentence to avoid repeating the word "announced"
  • Wikilink power-ups and level to the relevant article to help non-experts

Gameplay

[edit]

Development and promotion

[edit]
  • "Aero-Cross was intended as the third game under the Namco Generations label, a brand created by Namco Bandai Games for use on modernized remakes of their older video games." - older titles.

Cancellation

[edit]
  • "Fletcher commented on the game's new features and for building upon the original Metro-Cross gameplay in an interesting manner. He commented:" - the text in bold isn't needed
  • "believed that the game likely never would have had" - would likely never have
  • "that big of an audience" - large

References

[edit]
  • The author of Reference 13 should be formatted as Fletcher, JC for consistency
  • References 14 shouldn't include staff as the author

Will put the review on hold to allow the nominator to address/query the points raised above. MWright96 (talk) 11:56, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@MWright96: - Issues addressed. Namcokid47 (Contribs) 00:06, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]