Talk:Nintendo European Research & Development

Business Mid‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Video games: Nintendo Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Nintendo task force.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Purple Francis (6 participants)
Gilman Louie (2 participants)
Yoshimitsu (2 participants)
Dr. Wily (8 participants)
First Internet Backgammon Server (3 participants)
Emote (2 participants)
Stardew Valley Guidebook (2 participants)
Preston Arsement (6 participants; relisted)
Jackpot World (3 participants; relisted)
Melee (game terminology) (7 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Pronunciation

I'm not an IPA expert, so I'm not entirely sure that I properly defined Actimagine's pronunciation. In non-IPA format, I would've written it as oct-i-ma-jeen. ~MDD 46 96 02:39, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Purchase By Adobe?

I read a while ago somewhere that Adobe had purchased Actimagine, but I can't seem to find the article. Can anyone confirm this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdhenry (talk • contribs) 16:46, 30 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do not believe this to be true. ~MDD 46 96 17:43, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actimagine Ownership in 2008

As far as I know, the company is privately owned, although they may be going through a round of venture-capital funding. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.7.112.76 (talk • contribs) 21:25, 5 June 2008

Can someone update this? The offical company name is Mobiclip, and apparently they are now owned by Nintendo. 108.208.102.9 (talk) 05:31, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

PROD and Notability

I removed a ton of market-speak and the prod notice. The company is small but it sells its technology to quite a few very well-known companies, so I believe it is notable by association. Also I think the references at the bottom are sufficient third party news sources, per Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). ~MDD 46 96 17:43, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I don't see a single third-party news source listed (press releases don't count). Could you please be more specific about what non-trivial coverage you've found by independent reliable sources? Thanks. — Satori Son 17:52, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm I guess I got confused between press releases and third-party news... ~MDD 46 96 15:25, 20 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Name change

It hasn't been called Actimagine in years. Apparently is has been changed to Nintendo's NERD division (Nintendo European Research & Development France).. So should the article be renamed that? I feel so, so this should be official consensus for the name change. I, quite obviously, say yes Umbreon00 (talk) 23:40, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

French Aritcles

I changed the redirects to the English Version of the articles but it still needs work to have the redirects land on the right space in the article. Anyone can complete this work? 107.216.116.49 (talk) 01:57, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

Wii U Chat

What I think should be changed: Unsourced statement of contribution to the Wii U Chat should be removed.
Why it should be changed: Nintendo European Research & Development did not contribute to this software package.
References supporting the possible change: The closest existing reference^[1] makes no mention of the company but correctly credits Nintendo Software Technology and Vidyo.