Jump to content

Talk:AFL (video game series)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Mascot Manor?

[edit]

Does this count as part of the main AFL series?

http://www.kotaku.com.au/2009/05/another-afl-game-announced/

It has a mini-AFL game in it. Perhaps it should be on this page?--Senor Freebie (talk) 06:13, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redo AFL 99 section?

[edit]

Please do not give your own personal view on the game. This is wikipedia! Please be informative and just explain what the game is, and its quality for the time. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.175.171.124 (talk) 14:01, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please include...

[edit]

Aussie Rules Footy (NES),AFL 98 and AFL 99 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.110.102.215 (talk) 11:57, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AFL on Wii Eventually

[edit]

Source: http://wii.mmgn.com/News/AFL-on-Wii-Eventually

It seems that Big Ant confirmed a Wii AFL game at some point.--Senor Freebie (talk) 00:29, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Beam Vs Krome

[edit]

Beam wrote this game. It shouldn't matter that the company was taken over by another many years later (or whatever happened), it's Beam on the box.

A good example of why it should stay as Beam is Wipeout (video game). It was developed by Psygnosis which was later taken over by Sony to become Sony Liverpool, yet it is still listed as being developed by Psygnosis.

Another slightly different approach is Lemmings (video game). This was developed by DMA Design who later became Rockstar North. This is listed as "Developer(s) DMA Design (now Rockstar North)". This credits the original company, but explains who they have become.

How about we do the second method as that is the best of both worlds? Sequal1 (talk) 10:52, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Premiership Coach Removal?

[edit]

As a game that sold thousands of copies in major retail outlets it certainly belongs on this list for it to be complete, yet it was removed without comment. If it is removed again I would like justification as to why that is the case! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.34.27.36 (talk) 05:56, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It was Thegamemuster aka Guinea pig warrior (indef banned), he does that. 93.182.147.45 (talk) 08:16, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Australian rules football Commodore 64

[edit]

Why was this removed? It is the first Australian rules football game, not the Nintendo one. If you don't believe me, look here.[1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.224.0.139 (talk) 07:35, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ http://au.gamespot.com/c64/sports/austrailanrulesfootball/index.html

Non-free file problem

[edit]

File:Australian Football League.svg was removed from this article because it either does not have a Non-free use rationale or there are problems with the existing rationale. Please see Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria for the applicable policy and Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline for how to fix the problem. If further input or help is needed, questions can be directed towards Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or my talk page. Thank you. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 09:21, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on AFL (video game series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:08, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on AFL (video game series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:36, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:AFL_(video_game_series)&oldid=1197144681"