Talk:2019 Maharashtra Legislative Assembly election

This page was proposed for deletion by Cinzia007 (talk · contribs) on 5 March 2022.

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

India: Maharashtra / Mumbai / Politics High‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Mumbai (assessed as Top-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as High-importance).

Politics High‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Elections and Referendums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

It is requested that a video clip or video clips be included in this article to improve its quality.

It is requested that one or more audio files be included in this article to improve its quality.
Please see Wikipedia:Requested recordings for more on this request.

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:

JayantPatil.png

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:51, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 24 October 2019

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In congress, this election is being led by the current congress Pradesh Pramukh Balasaheb Thorat and that should reflect on this page. Use the following for reference. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maharashtra_Pradesh_Congress_Committee Sapanparikh18 (talk) 08:35, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not done Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Can you provide a newspaper article which says Thorat is leading this election? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:52, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 25 October 2019

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The overall vote share of BJP in 2014 was 27.8. The figure 31.15 is for the vote share in constituencies where they have contested. So the dip is 2.05%. https://eci.gov.in/files/file/3726-maharashtra-2014/?do=download&csrfKey=952b6d47f80c0b3c6ea41ccbbca2d896 In page 16 you can verify this.Sharafalik (talk) 04:44, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. That link does not work. NiciVampireHeart 18:16, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry My mistake. It was a direct link to download the pdf file. Apparently it gets expired after some time. Here is link to the download page https://eci.gov.in/files/file/3726-maharashtra-2014/ . You have to manually download the pdf. you can verify my claim from the pdf. Its in page 16 of the pdf. (Sharafalik (talk) 05:31, 28 October 2019 (UTC))[reply]

Done--Goldsztajn (talk) 00:22, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gangakhed Ratnakar gutte

I want to add on Wikipedia Drprsk10 (talk) 08:52, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the right page to request additional user rights. You can open an edit request with the specific changes to be made, and someone will add them for you, or you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. NiciVampireHeart 18:19, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Changes

I've changed TBA to To be updated as the results are already announced. thank you --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ} 05:59, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrect total ?

Hi everyone,

I noticed that the total number of seats does not make 288, but 284. According to this site, there are small differences between what is currently displayed and the official results. Example : BVA, 3 seats instead of 2. Can anyone check this ? The page is currently semi-protected, and I don't want to make mistakes. Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:46, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Offical results here. Looks likes the following are missing from the table: Krantikari Shetkari Party (1), Jan Surajya Shakti (1), Prahar Janshakti Party (2).--Goldsztajn (talk) 00:38, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge of 2019 Maharashtra political crisis into 2019 Maharashtra Legislative Assembly election

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To not merge, with arguments including WP:TOOBIG, independent notability and suitability for WP:SUMMARY. Klbrain (talk) 16:47, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The so called "political crisis" is part of government formation and hence should be sub-section in the election article itself. Its just a part of result and the events that led to government formation. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 02:59, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The "political crisis" can be summarized as a sub-section and main article is for detailed information. No need of merger. As Opinion polling for the 2019 Indian general election is also a part of 2019 Indian general election but have a separate article for details. Manasbose{Talk / Edits} 6:43, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Political crisis article is 8k, Maha election is 170K. Opinion poll is 126K and main election 187K. It makes sense to split the opinion poll from main election. How is merging of 8K into 170K comparable with 300K bulk? Apart from just size considerations; what benefit do you get in splitting relevant info into two pages? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:18, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Different topics. 112.133.244.27 (talk) 08:05, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Political crisis are not part of any election. 2019 Karnataka political crisis has a separate article from 2018 Karnataka Legislative Assembly election. And every political crisis in the world have their separate Wikipedia pages.This one can not be any exception. Manasbose{Talk / Edits} 8:57, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Oppose. The political crisis is still under development. 2019 Maharashtra political crisis article size may increase. 14.139.128.24 (talk) 12:19, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support - I don't think this is a standalone article that is needed. We should merge it. And add a subsection of poltical crisis if needed. But making a whole article isn't needed here. Edward Zigma (talk) 15:32, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Election and Government formation crisis are two different events. Government formation is an aftermath of the election. The event is progressing and the article will be further expanded with more information. Election article is already too long so an independent article on the crisis will be helpful to the readers as well.-Nizil (talk) 07:10, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per comments from Nizil and Manas. They are, though interlinked, but two different events. Also, because the timeline of this crisis has been long due, this article might be equally long as the election article with a little summary in the said article. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 09:37, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Similar to the 2019 Karnataka political crisis, this has seen a chain of events including President's Rule in the state. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:06, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support I support the merging of the articles because this is a part of the ongoing government formation process which would indeed turn out to be lengthy due to multiple institutions of government in play. I also support this merger because there is no point to have a stand-alone article for this. This event would also set a precedent for strengthening institutions of Indian Judiciary, Legislature and Executives which would just be a summary of the complete timeline. Amdudeja (talk) 11:15, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Seats before don't seem to add up

The "seats before" don't seem to add up 142+75+29+54+1+2 is 303 in a 288 seat assembly. And if I compare seats before to "last election", they also don't seem to add up. BJP gained 20 seats via bypoll (or defections?), Shiv Sena 12, UPA 12. NCP lost 12, but unless there were a lot of independents or people in other parties and per 2014 Maharashtra Legislative Assembly election, there doesn't seem to have been, where did the other 32 seats gained after the last election come from? Nil Einne (talk) 14:53, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Changes to vote % and links

@Angole17637 Can you please check this edit and respond what you are trying to do. It seems you made several unintentional edits without any WP:EDITSUMMARY. Venkat TL (talk) 16:43, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Results section

Way too much clutter and repetitive stuff in the results section. We need to make it better. Creating a separate article for the result with all the data on this page that is present right now. And removing the not so important data from this page. AshuTri912 (talk) 07:59, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]