Jump to content

Talk:2007 Pacific hurricane season

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good article2007 Pacific hurricane season has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic star2007 Pacific hurricane season is the main article in the 2007 Pacific hurricane season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 12, 2013Good article nomineeListed
March 17, 2016Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Season Has Ended

[edit]
Please put all discussion unrelated to articles on the Hurricane Wikia.
2007 TROPICAL CYCLONE SUMMARY TABLE

NAME             DATES         MAX WIND (KT)     DEATHS
-------------------------------------------------------
TS ALVIN        27-31 MAY          35                0
TS BARBARA    29 MAY-2 JUN         45                0
TD THREE-E      11-12 JUN          30                0  
TD FOUR-E        9-11 JUL          30                0 
TD FIVE-E       14-15 JUL          30                0
H COSME         14-23 JUL          65                0
TS DALILA       22-27 JUL          50                0
TS ERICK      31 JUL- 2 AUG        35                0
H FLOSSIE        8-16 AUG         120                0
TS GIL         29 AUG-2 SEP        40                0
H HENRIETTE    30 AUG-6 SEP        75                9
TS THIRTEEN-E   19-20 SEP          30                0
H IVO           18-23 SEP          70                0
TS JULIETTE    29 SEP-2 OCT        50                0
TS KIKO         15-23 OCT          60                0
-------------------------------------------------------  

Declaring storms inactive

[edit]

The NHC issued Advisory 22 for Tropical Storm 22 at 2 pm PDT, and as I was updating the infobox (minutes after 2 pm PDT), some folks were declaring the storm inactive. At 2 pm PDT the NHC was still referring to it as a Tropical Depression ("THE DEPRESSION IS MOVING SLOWLY TOWARD THE EAST NEAR 5 MPH AND THIS GENERAL MOTION IS EXPECTED TO CONTINUE DURING THE NEXT 24 HOURS. ON THIS TRACK...THE REMNANT LOW OF IVO SHOULD PASS SOUTH OF THE EXTREME SOUTHERN TIP OF THE BAJA CALIFORNIA PENINSULA TONIGHT OR EARLY MONDAY."), but not 5 minutes later we now consider it to already be a remnant low? Am I crazy, or shouldn't any storm that's on the NHC Active Storms page (http://www.nhc.noaa.gov/nhc_storms.shtml) be considered active? We're not even going to update Advisory 22? What's the big rush to declare storms inactive? DOSGuy 22:15, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If we keep it active until it is gone from the NHC page there will be "As of 2pm PDT September 23 Tropical Depression Ivo was located..." for another 48 hours. There will be no more advisories so it is no longer active. ---CWY2190TC 23:01, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
We never had this problem before (not sure what we did) but I think it's a good idea to keep up the small infobox in the storm section until NHC takes it off. The NHC takes it off 24 hours after last advisory, so 24 hours of "As of 2pm PDT..." is not a problem, IMO. However, I do not think that it should be listed as active in the seasonal infobox. Hurricanehink (talk) 23:51, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see a problem with having it up for 24 hours after the final advisory. Information that is only 24 hours old is still timely, and the remnant of this particular storm is still going pass over the Baja California peninsula. I think we should take a storm down when the NHC does. They probably have a reason for leaving them up. DOSGuy 02:39, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Well, NRL monitors all systems for regeneration, which is why storms get left on that site for a few days. NRL uses NHC data with NHC's consent, but it's not official; the name is no longer active or in use when the last advisory is issued, except for systems which end up getting HPC advisories. --Coredesat 02:48, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
That's interesting. At any rate, my point is that rather than have the sentence "As of 2pm PDT September 23 Tropical Depression Ivo was located..." up for 24 hours, we chose not to post it at all. If the NHC issues an advisory, it seems to me that there was a reason, and we should post it for at least a few hours. I didn't realize that we had been failing to post the final advisory for storms up until now. I think if the NHC posts an advisory, so should we. When they take it down, so can we. I don't think there's a big rush to clear the board. DOSGuy 02:55, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assesment

[edit]

I would recommend that this page gets put up for a GA Nomination when the final 2 TCRs are out from the NHC i have also recomended this for the atlantic page Jason Rees (talk) 02:56, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ivo Tcr

[edit]

Ivo we are now just waiting for Flossie and the track maps Jason Rees (talk) 16:26, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flossie TCR

[edit]

[1] --Ajm81 06:14, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Map

[edit]

The official map is out now. [2] --Ajm81 22:49, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All right, let's upload it and put it in the template. -- §HurricaneERICarchive 23:39, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
It has a bad file name not according to the naming conventions for those maps. --213.155.231.26 (talk) 14:21, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TD4E and TD5E

[edit]

These two storms have the same picture and track map. Could someone fix this? bob rulz (talk) 15:47, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed it. -Ramisses (talk) 15:57, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:56, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:56, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:57, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:57, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:57, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:57, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:57, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:57, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:58, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:58, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:58, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:58, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:58, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:58, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:59, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:59, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:59, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:59, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:59, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 17:00, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
This review is transcluded from Talk:2007 Pacific hurricane season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hurricanehink (talk · contribs) 03:00, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

All in all, decent article, just a lot of small mistakes that can be easily fixed. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 03:00, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and I checked an earlier version of the article, and it appears you're missing impact for Gil. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:54, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on 2007 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:19, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2007 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:36, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Erick 2007 listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Erick 2007. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. A1Cafel (talk) 02:28, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Fails WP:NWX since the only impact was minimal flooding, winds, and surf. There wasn't any meteorological reasoning for the article existing either. Noah, AATalk 14:34, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge: as stated before, Cosme was not notable in any way, shape, or form ''Flux55'' (talk) 02:53, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.