Jump to content

Talk:2006 Pacific hurricane season

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured article2006 Pacific hurricane season is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Featured topic star2006 Pacific hurricane season is the main article in the 2006 Pacific hurricane season series, a featured topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on March 9, 2011.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 14, 2008Featured article candidatePromoted
June 29, 2010Featured topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Featured article

Previous page

[edit]

The previous page has been moved to List of storms in the 2006 Pacific hurricane season, partially to preserve edit history for that page. All of the archived have been moved, as well. ♬♩ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:27, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Link to the moved talkpage. -- RattleMan 03:20, 19 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]
  • Some of the references have full publication dates, while some only have publication years. Please make consistent. Also, the publication dates are in different formats, which needs to be consistent as well.
  • The accessdates need to be consistent in format. Also, many of the accessdates need to be updated.
  • Change the all-caps in ref #44 to sentence-case or title-case.
  • Ref #47 needs publisher information.
  • Ditto with #54 and #62.

Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 02:22, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FAC

[edit]

Have to say it: GO HINK!!!! --Dylan620 (Homeyadda yadda yaddaOoooohh!) 13:13, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! (+ one minor observation)

[edit]

Congrats, and well done to all contributors involved with getting this article on the Main Page! I did notice some extra space at the very top of the article. Is this due to the "NOTOC" command? Perhaps there is a fix I am not familiar with. --Another Believer (Talk) 00:19, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No its not. i removed the TOC command but their still seemed to be quite a bit of white space up the top.Jason Rees (talk) 03:02, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I think it may have something to do with Template:Infobox hurricane season, but I'm not sure exactly what. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:47, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
After toying around in the sandbox for some time, I finally discovered that if you don't have a "total depressions" field in the infobox, you get a ton of white space at the top. I'll add that field to see if it does anything. Looking at similar articles, it looks like "total depressions" include everything: depressions, storms, and hurricanes, so here it would be 25. Correct the article if I'm wrong. 71.113.41.108 (talk) 06:57, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, that helped a little but it's still not perfect. If we remove the "season list" and "season timeline" fields, all the whitespace disappears, but I don't know if we want to remove content just for the sake of appearance. 71.113.41.108 (talk) 07:07, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Politcal Neutral

[edit]

This article is B/S. It is not in the slightest politically neutral. It only includes tropical cyclones that have someway affected the USA. You know, hurricanes can exist in other parts of the world. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gavwah27 (talkcontribs) 14:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

We are fully aware that Hurricanes happen in other parts of the world, but this article is specifically defined as being for the Northern Eastern Pacific Basin which is between the International dateline and the Americas. If you have a look at the see also section of this article you will find links to the 9 other tropical cyclone seasons that took place during 2006.Jason Rees (talk) 16:04, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Many of them affected Mexico.. Brutannica (talk) 22:23, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"the National Hurricane Center (NHC) area of warning responsibility,": National should perhaps be prefaced by which nation it is, since there are several. I'd also say that the title gives the appearance that this is an article about the Pacific ocean, and while there may be many reasons which I've not considered or investigated for choosing to have one article about one side of the Pacific and its weather, and another about the other side of it, the title(s) should reflect that. I don't see it is a quetion of politics or neutrality, but of whether this is the Wikipedia, or the Wikipedia of (one of the polities of) the Americas. One of those is better than the other. Midgley (talk) 10:54, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The list of tropical cyclones in the western Pacific can be found at 2006 Pacific typhoon season. Over there they're called typhoons, here they're called hurricanes. Juliancolton (talk) 11:38, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Pacific tropical cyclones looks like a good title then. Midgley (talk) 00:07, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Again, there are tropical cyclones in the western Pacific. They're hurricanes east of the dateline, so that's why it's the hurricane season. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 00:21, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 06:29, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 06:29, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 06:29, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 06:30, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 06:30, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!

--JeffGBot (talk) 06:30, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:2006 Pacific hurricane season/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

The Naming section needs a brief overview of general tropical cyclone naming conventions, as well as a source. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone 20:42, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 20:42, 18 November 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 05:58, 29 April 2016 (UTC) Why so many articles?--104.152.214.35 (talk) 01:09, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on 2006 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:12, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 13 external links on 2006 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:26, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2006 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:39, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on 2006 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:37, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 2006 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:24, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2006 Pacific hurricane season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:50, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed merge with Hurricane Kristy (2006)

[edit]

A storm that had no impacts, and nothing special about MH. Ponting the main editors @Hurricanehink, Jason Rees, and Juliancolton:, also other interested editors @Yellow Evan, Cyclonebiskit, and Jasper Deng: B dash (talk) 15:16, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why on earth is this being discussed here and not the Kristy talk page? Anyhow, as I said yesterday, merge the shorter 2006 articles first. YE Pacific Hurricane 15:32, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Does it really matter where its spoken about? The main thing is that its spoken about and I agree that the article should be merged regardless of whichever order @Yellow Evan: thinks it should be done in.Jason Rees (talk) 19:38, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'll object. It's a fleshed-out and well-written piece with significant reliably sourced info that can't fit in a summary paragraph. I doubt that it would be written in today's wiki-environment, but it's here, has been for a long time, and remains actively watched and maintained by plenty of editors. Most crucially, no argument has been advanced as to why the article's existence may be an active and exigent detriment to the project. – Juliancolton | Talk 01:58, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Bud(2006) listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Hurricane Bud(2006). Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. A1Cafel (talk) 02:31, 12 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.



Fails WP:NWX due to a lack of impact and the records mentioned aren't that convincing in establishing notability. Most of these records are already mentioned within the season section and the rest of the article could likely be summarized. Noah, AATalk 20:37, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.



While this storm is somewhat notable, the article is small and the season section is lacking in details. Merging this would help to flesh it out a bit more. I believe everything here could be said in the season section. Noah, AATalk 01:54, 6 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.