Talk:1995 India cyclone

1995 India cyclone has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 12, 2016. (Reviewed version).

A fact from 1995 India cyclone appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 February 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that a 1995 storm caused 63 deaths in Nepal, 33 of them related to avalanches?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2016/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1995 India cyclone.

Wikipedia

Weather: Tropical Mid‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Mid-importance).

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was last assessed in September 2018.

Nepal Low‑importance

	Nepal portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nepal, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Nepal-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and add your name to the member's list.NepalWikipedia:WikiProject NepalTemplate:WikiProject NepalNepal articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:1995 India cyclone/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 12george1 (talk · contribs) 21:13, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hurricanehink. I will be reviewing this article to check if it's worthy of being listed among Wikipedia's Good articles. After a brief skim through, the article looks decent. But let me give it a more detailed look now.--12george1 (talk) 21:13, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"In November 1995, a tropical cyclone struck southeastern India and later spawned a rare snowstorm in Nepal," - Do you think you could link the 1995 North Indian Ocean cyclone season in here? Maybe at "November 1995"?

I added a link in the next sentence. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Reaching peak winds of at least 120 km/h (75 mph)," - What day did this happen?

Added. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why doesn't the MH mention the lowest minimum pressure?

I'm not sure, but thanks for catching that, the IMD report was lower than what was listed! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see that no warnings were issued in Nepal for the cyclone, but no preparations for India?

Weirdly, it looks like the international press didn't pay much attention to the storm in India until it made landfall. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking of India, no aftermath either?

There rarely is aftermath for moderate impact storms in India, especially in the 90s w/o a ReliefWeb report. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

" totals were 3000% of the average November rainfall" - Add a comma in "3000%"

Done. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So it was a pretty decent article after all. Nothing real significant. I just have these six issues that I need you to fix or address in a timely manner before I can list this article as a Good Article.--12george1 (talk) 21:13, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1995 India cyclone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120412152908/http://www.imd.gov.in/section/nhac/dynamic/rsmcobmission.pdf to http://www.imd.gov.in/section/nhac/dynamic/rsmcobmission.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:50, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]