Talk:1995 India cyclone/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 12george1 (talk · contribs) 21:13, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Hurricanehink. I will be reviewing this article to check if it's worthy of being listed among Wikipedia's Good articles. After a brief skim through, the article looks decent. But let me give it a more detailed look now.--12george1 (talk) 21:13, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"In November 1995, a tropical cyclone struck southeastern India and later spawned a rare snowstorm in Nepal," - Do you think you could link the 1995 North Indian Ocean cyclone season in here? Maybe at "November 1995"?

I added a link in the next sentence. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Reaching peak winds of at least 120 km/h (75 mph)," - What day did this happen?

Added. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why doesn't the MH mention the lowest minimum pressure?

I'm not sure, but thanks for catching that, the IMD report was lower than what was listed! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see that no warnings were issued in Nepal for the cyclone, but no preparations for India?

Weirdly, it looks like the international press didn't pay much attention to the storm in India until it made landfall. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking of India, no aftermath either?

There rarely is aftermath for moderate impact storms in India, especially in the 90s w/o a ReliefWeb report. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

" totals were 3000% of the average November rainfall" - Add a comma in "3000%"

Done. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 21:25, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So it was a pretty decent article after all. Nothing real significant. I just have these six issues that I need you to fix or address in a timely manner before I can list this article as a Good Article.--12george1 (talk) 21:13, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]