Talk:1967 Atlantic hurricane season

1967 Atlantic hurricane season has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: September 3, 2016. (Reviewed version).

Weather: Tropical / Atlantic Mid‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Atlantic hurricane work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Todo

Fix sections. Jdorje 01:57, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Beulah

I've expanded the section on Hurricane Beulah using some information from the article itself. It still might need some work though. -Tcwd | Talk 15:20, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good job. That looks fine. Hurricanehink (talk) 15:28, 4 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ginger or Christine?

This article claims that Ginger was the easternmost forming tropical cyclone, whereas 1973 Atlantic hurricane season says the same thing about Christine. Which is correct? Jamie|C 12:33, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The more recent storm article/reference, of course. Thegreatdr (talk) 03:29, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:1967 Atlantic hurricane season/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 12george1 (talk · contribs) 17:39, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hurricanehink. I will be review this article today. I'm glad you did this season. Overall, it looks decent, but I do have a few issues that I'll need you to fix or address before I can decide to pass it.--12george1 (talk) 17:39, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Heidi – lost tropical characteristics on November 1." - The infobox says October 31

Oops, got it. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The death toll in the infobox is incorrect. Based on the info in the lede, there were at least 79 deaths

Ah yea, forgot to update that. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"The storm soon after transitioned into an extratropical cyclone," - I think that would read better like this "Soon after, the storm transitioned into an extratropical cyclone,"

Good call. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are the Beulah and Chloe sections in the correct order? If so, I think you may want to mention why. I know the answer to that, but others may not.

They are, and I state when each storm formed. Chloe formed before Beulah by 12 hours. How do you recommend making it more obvious to the readers? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Scratch that. I feel like it may be more complicated than just saying one was named before the other due to the TD designation situation.--12george1 (talk) 19:05, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"it to Tropical Storm Ginger, in conjunction with data from Cabo Verde." - Were there land observations of tropical storm force winds? You should mention that if that's the case

Nah, NHC just said "observations", nothing about wind speeds. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"the name Beulah was retired and replaced with Beth in 1971." - Beth should not be in bold

Done. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference 2 is a deadlink

Removed link. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why is Robert Simpson referred to as R. H. Simpson in reference 4, but Bob Simpson in reference 17? I don't care about which of the three ways you refer to him, just that both are the same.

Forgot they were both the same when I wrote their names in :P ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That should be it. You know the drill: fix or address these in a timely manner and I will pass this article.--12george1 (talk) 17:39, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hope these changes work! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'm satisfied with the chances. So I will now pass this article and list it as a GA.--12george1 (talk) 19:05, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]