Talk:1967 Atlantic hurricane season/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 12george1 (talk · contribs) 17:39, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hurricanehink. I will be review this article today. I'm glad you did this season. Overall, it looks decent, but I do have a few issues that I'll need you to fix or address before I can decide to pass it.--12george1 (talk) 17:39, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Heidi – lost tropical characteristics on November 1." - The infobox says October 31

Oops, got it. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The death toll in the infobox is incorrect. Based on the info in the lede, there were at least 79 deaths

Ah yea, forgot to update that. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"The storm soon after transitioned into an extratropical cyclone," - I think that would read better like this "Soon after, the storm transitioned into an extratropical cyclone,"

Good call. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are the Beulah and Chloe sections in the correct order? If so, I think you may want to mention why. I know the answer to that, but others may not.

They are, and I state when each storm formed. Chloe formed before Beulah by 12 hours. How do you recommend making it more obvious to the readers? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Scratch that. I feel like it may be more complicated than just saying one was named before the other due to the TD designation situation.--12george1 (talk) 19:05, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"it to Tropical Storm Ginger, in conjunction with data from Cabo Verde." - Were there land observations of tropical storm force winds? You should mention that if that's the case

Nah, NHC just said "observations", nothing about wind speeds. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"the name Beulah was retired and replaced with Beth in 1971." - Beth should not be in bold

Done. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference 2 is a deadlink

Removed link. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why is Robert Simpson referred to as R. H. Simpson in reference 4, but Bob Simpson in reference 17? I don't care about which of the three ways you refer to him, just that both are the same.

Forgot they were both the same when I wrote their names in :P ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That should be it. You know the drill: fix or address these in a timely manner and I will pass this article.--12george1 (talk) 17:39, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hope these changes work! ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'm satisfied with the chances. So I will now pass this article and list it as a GA.--12george1 (talk) 19:05, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]