Talk:1806 Great Coastal hurricane

1806 Great Coastal hurricane has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 6, 2014. (Reviewed version).

A fact from 1806 Great Coastal hurricane appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 March 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that during the 1806 Great Coastal hurricane, an estimated 36 inches (91 cm) of rain fell on Edgartown, Massachusetts?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2014/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1806 Great Coastal hurricane.

Wikipedia

Weather: Tropical / Atlantic Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Atlantic hurricane work group (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:1806 Great Coastal hurricane/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Hurricanehink (talk · contribs) 04:24, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why the "possibly" in the opening sentence?

I wanted to indicate that it was an estimate, but meh. Cloudchased (talk) 12:52, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Weather historian David M. Ludlum followed the disturbance's track to the Bahamas by 19 August; intense winds continued until 21 August, however, approximately 150 mi (240 km) east of Eleuthera" - I dont get the "however" and "continued", or the location. Does that mean the hurricane remained in that area? Some clearer wording would be good.

Done? Cloudchased (talk) 12:52, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"Steering currents brought the storm northward, and it approached Charleston, South Carolina on 22 August, where an easterly flow incessantly varying from northeast to southeast veering north-northeastward preceded the storm, indicated its passage far east of the city." - too verbose here. Just write exactly what happened. Remember, you don't have to write a lot to write well.

Cut out a bit. Cloudchased (talk) 12:52, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Did it really dissipate on the 25th? I can't read the source. Or, was it last observed?

Last observed. Cloudchased (talk) 12:52, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"While stationed off of the New England shoreline" --> "While offshore New England". What's wrong with simple writing? It seems like you're trying to make the article longer by fluffing sentences.

Blah, blibbity. Cloudchased (talk) 12:52, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Offshore New England shoreline is still redundant :P Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 17:44, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

"numerous ships experienced damage and considerable destruction to structures was observed" - it read like the ships experienced damage and destruction, which is redundant, but then I realized this is a Garden path sentence. Please fix!

Clarified. Cloudchased (talk) 12:52, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

All in all, a pretty good short article. This shouldn't take much time to fix :) ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 04:24, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm currently away from my computer, but I'll pass this later on, even if you don't get the bit about the shoreline :P Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 17:44, 5 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]