Jump to content

1917 New York City mayoral election

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1917 New York City mayoral election

← 1913 November 6, 1917 1921 →
 
Candidate John F. Hylan John P. Mitchel
Party Democratic Independent
Popular vote 314,010 155,497
Percentage 46.78% 23.16%

 
Candidate Morris Hillquit William M. Bennett
Party Socialist Republican
Popular vote 145,332 56,438
Percentage 21.65% 8.4%

Results by Borough
  Hylan—50–60%
  Hylan—<50%

Mayor before election

John P. Mitchel
Independent

Elected mayor

John F. Hylan
Democratic

The 1917 New York City mayoral election was held on November 6, 1917. Incumbent mayor John Purroy Mitchel, a reform Democrat running on the Fusion Party ticket, was defeated for re-election by Judge John Francis Hylan, supported by Tammany Hall and William Randolph Hearst.

The election was notable not only for the first partisan primary elections for city offices, but for the contentious debate over American entry into World War I, vigorously supported by Mitchel and opposed by the Socialist candidate, Morris Hillquit. Mitchel and Hillquit each won about a fifth of the total vote, while Hylan won office with less than half the vote.

Background

[edit]

John Purroy Mitchel, a Republican, was nominated for mayor in 1913 on an electoral fusion ticket. Mitchel had gained a reputation as a reformer and opponent of Tammany Hall for his investigations into corruption in city government. After incumbent mayor William Jay Gaynor died on September 10, 1913, from complications stemming from his attempted assassination in 1910, Mitchel won the general election in a landslide over Democratic nominee Edward E. McCall and Socialist nominee Charles Edward Russell and became the second youngest mayor in New York City history.

As mayor, Mitchel's popularity sharply waned. His continued cuts to public spending, strong support for private transit, and proposed education reforms under the Gary Plan were unpopular with voters, and although a staunch Irish Catholic, his investigations into Catholic charities for corruption and fraud alienated the city's large Catholic population. Tammany Hall united with longtime opponent William Randolph Hearst to oppose Mitchel's plans for

Beginning in 1916, political debate centered on American involvement in World War I, which Mitchel vigorously supported. His focus on national and international issues, as well as his frequent socialization with the city's elite, further eroded his popularity, as voters saw him as out of touch with local concerns. On April 6, the United States officially declared war and began to mobilize its military for deployment.

In contrast to Mitchel's support for the war, the Socialist Party came out strongly against American involvement. Morris Hillquit, a leading socialist from Manhattan, co-authored the national party's St. Louis Manifesto, which proclaimed,

The Socialist Party of the United States in the present grave crisis solemnly reaffirms its allegiance to the principle of internationalism and working-class solidarity the world over, and proclaims its unalterable opposition to the war just declared by the Government of the United States.[1]

Hillquit's refusal to support the war by such acts as buying Liberty Bonds[2] won the Socialists new support in many immigrant communities.[3]

Republican primary

[edit]

Candidates

[edit]

Results

[edit]

The Republican nomination was tightly contested and resulted in an official recount, with Bennett narrowly defeating Mitchel for the party's nomination. Mitchel appeared to win the initial count, but a series of counting mistakes and revelations of electoral fraud, resulting in criminal indictments, gave a narrow victory to Bennett. Bennett declined to withdraw from the race, and attempts to find a compromise anti-Tammany candidate failed, leading Mitchel to wage an independent campaign for re-election.

Democratic primary

[edit]

Candidates

[edit]

Declined

[edit]

Campaign

[edit]

Al Smith initially sought to run for mayor, but Tammany Hall leader Charles F. Murphy preferred Hylan as a candidate with the support of William Randolph Hearst and Brooklyn party leader John McCooey. Instead, Smith was selected as the party's nominee for president of the board of aldermen in 1916, which he won.[4]

General election

[edit]

Candidates

[edit]

Campaign

[edit]
"The New Western Front", a New York Times cartoon implying Kaiser Wilhelm II favored Hillquit and Hylan. The caption read, "Crown Prince: 'Any more victories, Papa?' - Kaiser: 'I can't tell until Tuesday.'"

The Fall 1917 election, which The New York Times called a "puzzle without parallel",[5] would have been exciting even had it occurred in peacetime.

Hylan's position on the war was unclear; he focused instead on criticisms of the administration's support for private transit corporations.

In the final weeks, the Fusion campaign focused its attacks on Hillquit. Mayor Mitchel hinted at Hillquit's foreign birth by saying that "any man who will not buy a Liberty bond when he can afford them is not fit to be a citizen of the United States",[6] and former President Theodore Roosevelt declared that Hillquit "stands as an aid to the Prussianized autocracy of the Hohenzollerns."[7]

Results

[edit]

As of 2024, this is the highest percentage of the vote the Socialist Party has received in a mayoral election; the party also elected ten State Assemblymen, seven city Aldermen, and a municipal court judge.

1917 New York City mayoral election
Party Candidate Votes % ±%
Democratic John Francis Hylan 314,010 45.39% Increase 8.1
Fusion John P. Mitchel (incumbent) 155,497 22.48% Decrease34.6
Socialist Morris Hillquit 145,332 21.01% Increase15.9
Republican William M. Bennett 56,438 8.2% N/A
Socialist Labor Edmund Seidel
Total votes 691,809 100.00%

Results by borough

[edit]

Hylan won every borough, though he carried a majority only in Queens and Staten Island. Mayor Mitchel ran second in every borough but the Bronx, where Hillquit pushed Mitchel into third place; he came within two hundred votes of doing the same in Queens. Bennett came in fourth in each borough except Staten Islnad, where he finished third ahead of Hillquit.

candidate party Manhattan The Bronx Brooklyn Queens Richmond
(Staten Is.)
Total %
John Francis Hylan Democratic 113,728 41,546 114,487 35,399 8,850 314,010 46.8%
46.4% 42.9% 46.5% 51.7% 58.3%
John Purroy Mitchel Fusion 66,748 19,247 52,921 13,641 2,940 155,497 23.2%
27.3% 19.9% 21.5% 19.9% 19.4%
Morris Hillquit Socialist 51,176 30,374 48,880 13,477 1,425 145,332 21.7%
20.9% 31.4% 19.9% 19.7% 9.4%
William M. Bennett Republican 13,230 5,576 29,748 5,916 1,968 56,438 8.4%
5.4% 5.8% 12.1% 8.6% 13.0%
Subtotal 244,882 96,743 246,036 68,433 15,183 671,277
Edmund Seidel Socialist Labor 20,586
others
T O T A L 691,809

[Others and Total from The Encyclopedia of New York City (Yale, 1995), which does not exactly match the other numbers, taken from The World Almanac for 1929 & 1943.]

Aftermath

[edit]

John F. Hylan was decisively re-elected in 1921, but he lost the 1925 Democratic primary to Jimmy Walker after a split among Democratic borough leaders, reflecting the deep enmity between Hylan's patron, William Randolph Hearst, and Al Smith.[8]

Following his defeat, Mitchel volunteered for service with the U.S. Army Signal Corps. He fell out of his aircraft to his death while training on July 6, 1918, exactly eight months after the election.

The Socialist Party, which drew heavy scrutiny from the federal government following the Russian Revolution and First Red Scare suffered crippling losses in the following years. In 1919, many of its members resigned to found the American Communist movement. Morris Hillquit, who remained with the party he had helped to found, ran again for mayor again in 1932, received an eighth of the vote, and died the following year.

See also

[edit]

References

[edit]
  1. ^ War proclamation and program adopted at the National Convention of the Socialist Party of the United States, St. Louis, Mo., April 1917 accessed June 18, 2008. Available in print as "St. Louis Manifesto of the Socialist Party 1917" in Socialism in America from the Shakers to the Third International: a documentary history, edited by Albert Fried, Doubleday Anchor edition, 1970, p. 521.
  2. ^ In point 2 of its program, the St. Louis Manifesto (cited above) promised, "We pledge ourselves to oppose with all our strength any attempt to raise money for payment of war expense by taxing the necessaries of life or issuing bonds which will put the burden upon future generations. We demand that the capitalist class, which is responsible for the war, pay its cost. Let those who kindled the fire, furnish the fuel."
  3. ^ Irving Howe, World of Our Fathers, (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich 1976 ISBN 0-15-146353-0), pp. 319–321; James Weinstein's Decline of Socialism (see Sources below), Vintage 1969 edition, p. 158.
  4. ^ Robert A. Slayton, Empire Statesman: The Rise and Redemption of Al Smith, The Free Press, New York, 2001, ISBN 0-684-86302-2, pp. 115–116.
  5. ^ CITY'S MOST COMPLEX ELECTION, The New York Times Sunday Magazine, November 4, 1917, page 2, seen June 18, 2008, which begins, "MEN who have lived long in New York City and had opportunities for a close view of its political battles say that the present Mayoralty campaign is the most extraordinary within their memory."
  6. ^ Weinstein's Decline of Socialism, Vintage 1969 edition, page 151, citing The New York World of October 26, 1917.
  7. ^ ROOSEVELT CALLS SUPPORT OF MAYOR DUTY TO NATION, The New York Times, Tuesday, October 30, 1917, page 1. The sub-headlines read: Declares Votes for Mitchel Will Hearten True Americans in War Crisis. HILLQUIT IS DENOUNCED Colonel Declares He Stands as Aid to the Hohenzollern's 'Prussianized Autocracy.' ASSAILS THE 'SHADOW HUNS' Asserts Voters Must Decide Whether America Is to Become a "Polyglot Boarding House."
  8. ^ Robert A. Slayton, Empire Statesman: The Rise and Redemption of Al Smith, The Free Press, New York, 2001, ISBN 0-684-86302-2, pp. 221–225.

Sources

[edit]