Draft:Classic Tech
| Submission rejected on 21 August 2024 by CFA (talk). This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. Rejected by CFA 2 months ago. Last edited by CFA 2 months ago. |  |
| Submission declined on 7 July 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk).DoubleGrazing 4 months ago. |  |
| Submission declined on 9 January 2024 by DoubleGrazing (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by DoubleGrazing 10 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 14 November 2022 by Theroadislong (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Theroadislong 23 months ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 27 September 2022 by 331dot (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by 331dot 2 years ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 26 September 2022 by Theroadislong (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Theroadislong 2 years ago.
| |
Comment: Resubmitted without improvement. This is wasting reviewers' time. C F A 💬 01:46, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I should probably be rejecting this, given the number of earlier declines and persistent lack of evidence of notability, but let's give it one more try. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:03, 7 July 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: You need to make WP:PAID disclosures. Usedtobecool ☎️ 13:24, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
- Comment: This just documents the existence of the company. It does not summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the company, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable company. 331dot (talk) 09:56, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
 | This article may have been created or edited in return for undisclosed payments, a violation of Wikipedia's terms of use. It may require cleanup to comply with Wikipedia's content policies, particularly neutral point of view. (July 2024) |
 | |
Native name | क्लासिक टेक |
|---|---|
| Company type | Private |
| Industry | Telecommunications |
| Founded | 2009 |
| Founder | Pramesh Kharel |
| Headquarters | Kathmandu, Nepal |
Area served | Nepal |
| Services | Broadband Internet access |
Number of employees | 1200 |
| Website | classic |
Classic Tech is a licensed Network Service Provider and Internet service provider in Nepal, providing broadband service.[1] The company was founded in year 2009.[2]
Classic Tech has provided internet connectivity along with IPTV services throughout Nepal from 103 outlets in 74 districts using Fiber to the Home (FTTH) technology.[3][4][5][6]
Classic Tech has been a member of Nepal Internet Exchange (NPIX) since 2011.[7][8] It along with other Network Service Providers of Nepal import international bandwidth from Indian Telecommunications and Chinese Telecommunications, and should be in line with Nepal Telecommunications Authority (NTA) and Nepal Government. [9]Classic Tech is a member of APNIC.[10]
History
[edit]Established as Zero Point Remit Pvt. Ltd. in 2009, Classic Tech transformed into an Internet Service Provider (IPS) in 2010 and a network service provider/distributor in 2014.11
Later in 2014, the company obtained license for Network Service Provider (NSP)[11].
IPv6 Deployment
[edit]Classic Tech started IPv6 deployment initiative around 2020,[12][13][14][15]. Classic Tech has announced around 12 IPv6 prefixes. Examples of prefixes are 2407:5200:32::/48 and 2407:5200:48::/48. [16]
See Also
[edit]References
[edit]- ^ Authority, Nepal Telecommunications (13 February 2022). "MIS Reports". NEPAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS AUTHORITY (नेपाल दूरसञ्चार प्राधिकरण ). Retrieved 2023-12-21.
- ^ Subba, Bishwas (2021-07-24). ""Nepal's 8 most popular internet service providers (ISPs) and their unique strengths"". Online Khabar. Retrieved 2023-12-21.
- ^ Aryal, Mina (2020-11-25). "ClassiTech Vs Subisu - Which One is Better?". ICT Frame. Retrieved 2023-12-21.
- ^ Dinesh (2017-06-17). "Best ISP Internet Service Providers in Nepal: Comparing Packages, Prices, Speed and Offers". NepaliTelecom. Retrieved 2024-01-09.
- ^ "Classic Tech launches 1Gbps fibre connection". TeleGeography. Retrieved 2024-01-09.
- ^ "Classic Tech: Safeguarding connectivity during Nepal earthquakes". BTW Media. 4 March 2024. Retrieved 2 July 2024.
- ^ "New Member at NPIX PTS Switch | Internet Exchange Nepal". 2011-04-03. Retrieved 2024-01-09.
- ^ "NPIX Members".
- ^ Prasain, Krishana (2023-11-21). "Internet traffic grows sharply in Nepal after TikTok ban". Asia News Network. Retrieved 2024-01-09.
- ^ "APNIC Members | APNIC". Retrieved 2024-07-07.
- ^ ""License List"". Nepal Telecommunications Authority (NTA). 13 February 2022. Retrieved 2023-12-21.
- ^ "IPv6 Per-Country Deployment for Classic Tech". APNIC. Retrieved 2023-12-21.
- ^ Palikhe, Ayush (2020-08-31). "Classic Tech; first ISP implementing IPv6 technology in Nepal". ICT Byte. Retrieved 2023-12-21.
- ^ Aryal, Mina (2020-08-22). "Classic Tech Ahead in the Use of IPv6 Technology in Terms of Percentage". ICT Frame. Retrieved 2023-12-21.
- ^ Byte, Gadget (2020-08-24). "ISPs in Nepal are introducing IPv6, but what does it really mean?". Gadget Byte. Retrieved 2023-12-21.
- ^ "Summary for AS55915". DNSlytics. Retrieved 2023-12-21.
External links
[edit]Categories:
- AfC submissions by date/20 August 2024
- AfC submissions by date/07 July 2024
- AfC submissions by date/09 January 2024
- AfC submissions by date/14 November 2022
- AfC submissions by date/27 September 2022
- AfC submissions by date/26 September 2022
- Draft articles on software
- Draft articles on technology
- AfC submissions on organisations existing today
- in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
- reliable
- secondary
- strictly independent of the subject
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.