1908 United States presidential election in Georgia
 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 County Results
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Elections in Georgia |
|---|
 |
The 1908 United States presidential election in Georgia took place on November 3, 1908, as part of the wider United States presidential election. Voters chose 13 representatives, or electors, to the Electoral College, who voted for president and vice president.
Following Reconstruction, Georgia would be the first former Confederate state to substantially disenfranchise its newly enfranchised freedmen, doing so in the early 1870s.[1] This largely limited the Republican Party to a few North Georgia counties with substantial Civil War Unionist sentiment – chiefly Fannin but also to a lesser extent Pickens, Gilmer and Towns.[2] The Democratic Party served as the guardian of white supremacy against a Republican Party historically associated with memories of Reconstruction, and the main competition became Democratic primaries, which state laws restricted to whites on the grounds of the Democratic Party being legally a private club.[3]
However, politics after the first demobilization by a cumulative poll tax was chaotic. Third-party movements, chiefly the Populist Party, gained support amongst poor whites and the remaining black voters in opposition to the planter elite.[4] The fact that Georgia had already substantially reduced its poor white and black electorate two decades ago, alongside pressure from urban elites in Atlanta,[4] meant the Populist movement substantially faded in the late 1890s.[5] Nevertheless, this did not prevent demands for more complete disenfranchisement after the state's politics again turned chaotic as former vice-presidential candidate Thomas E. Watson attempted to revive the Populist Party in 1904, whilst Hoke Smith ran for Governor as a radical reformist in 1906.[6]
Georgia was won by the Democratic nominees, former Nebraska Congressman and two-time prior Democratic nominee William Jennings Bryan and his running mate John W. Kern of Indiana. They defeated the Republican candidates, United States Secretary of War William Howard Taft of Ohio and his running mate James S. Sherman of New York. Bryan won the state by a margin of 23.39%.
The aim of co-opting the Populists led Georgia to become the last former Confederate state to initiate a full-scale disenfranchisement plan to largely eliminate the seventy thousand or so blacks who remained on the rolls.[7] The process, involving a literacy test and a grandfather clause in addition to the poll tax, alongside statewide white primaries, was achieved in the next presidential election year, when a transformed Watson ran for the Populist Party on a white supremacist campaign. At the same time the Republican Party aimed to make gains in the South because of opposition by developing manufacturers to William Jennings Bryan’s populism,[8] and by nominee William Howard Taft’s willingness to accept black disfranchisement.[9]
At the beginning of September, Taft spoke of carrying Georgia and other southern states, though this idea was dismissed by Democratic committee members.[10] Polls, when taken in October, always suggested Bryan would win the state, though by a smaller margin than usual.[11] This was indeed the observed result, although anti-populist sentiment[8] resulted in the GOP carrying twelve secessionist upcountry counties that had never gone Republican before.[12] Watson fell substantially from his 1904 performance, and would disband the Populist Party after the election.
Bryan had previously won Georgia against William McKinley in both 1896 and 1900.
Results
[edit]| 1908 United States presidential election in Georgia[13] | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Party | Candidate | Votes | Percentage | Electoral votes | |
| Democratic | William Jennings Bryan | 72,350 | 54.60% | 13 | |
| Republican | William Howard Taft | 41,355 | 31.21% | 0 | |
| People's | Thomas E. Watson | 16,687 | 12.59% | 0 | |
| Prohibition | Eugene W. Chafin | 1,452 | 1.10% | 0 | |
| Socialist | Eugene V. Debs | 584 | 0.44% | 0 | |
| Independence | Thomas L. Hisgen | 76 | 0.06% | 0 | |
Results by county
[edit]| County | William Jennings Bryan[14] Democratic |
William Howard Taft[14] Republican |
Thomas Edward Watson[14] Populist |
Eugene Wilder Chafin[14] Prohibition |
Various candidates[14] Other parties |
Margin | Total votes cast | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | # | % | ||
| Appling | 249 | 33.51% | 250 | 33.65% | 244 | 32.84% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | -1 | -0.13% | 743 |
| Baker | 149 | 69.63% | 36 | 16.82% | 29 | 13.55% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 113 | 52.80% | 214 |
| Baldwin | 417 | 59.57% | 201 | 28.71% | 74 | 10.57% | 8 | 1.14% | 0 | 0.00% | 216 | 30.86% | 700 |
| Banks | 211 | 36.38% | 221 | 38.10% | 147 | 25.34% | 1 | 0.17% | 0 | 0.00% | -10 | -1.72% | 580 |
| Bartow | 726 | 45.60% | 780 | 48.99% | 73 | 4.59% | 11 | 0.69% | 2 | 0.13% | -54 | -3.39% | 1,592 |
| Ben Hill | 407 | 41.87% | 412 | 42.39% | 49 | 5.04% | 104 | 10.70% | 0 | 0.00% | -5 | -0.51% | 972 |
| Berrien | 595 | 66.70% | 212 | 23.77% | 64 | 7.17% | 19 | 2.13% | 2 | 0.22% | 383 | 42.94% | 892 |
| Bibb | 1,946 | 75.46% | 565 | 21.91% | 51 | 1.98% | 14 | 0.54% | 3 | 0.12% | 1,381 | 53.55% | 2,579 |
| Brooks | 472 | 49.89% | 362 | 38.27% | 103 | 10.89% | 4 | 0.42% | 5 | 0.53% | 110 | 11.63% | 946 |
| Bulloch | 756 | 69.36% | 116 | 10.64% | 218 | 20.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 538[a] | 49.36% | 1,090 |
| Burke | 519 | 66.37% | 193 | 24.68% | 70 | 8.95% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 326 | 41.69% | 782 |
| Butts | 348 | 53.46% | 167 | 25.65% | 131 | 20.12% | 5 | 0.77% | 0 | 0.00% | 181 | 27.80% | 651 |
| Calhoun | 272 | 65.70% | 106 | 25.60% | 33 | 7.97% | 0 | 0.00% | 3 | 0.72% | 166 | 40.10% | 414 |
| Camden | 181 | 43.20% | 233 | 55.61% | 1 | 0.24% | 4 | 0.95% | 0 | 0.00% | -52 | -12.41% | 419 |
| Campbell | 210 | 45.06% | 140 | 30.04% | 116 | 24.89% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 70 | 15.02% | 466 |
| Carroll | 917 | 51.32% | 505 | 28.26% | 356 | 19.92% | 4 | 0.22% | 5 | 0.28% | 412 | 23.06% | 1,787 |
| Catoosa | 317 | 59.03% | 213 | 39.66% | 4 | 0.74% | 3 | 0.56% | 0 | 0.00% | 104 | 19.37% | 537 |
| Charlton | 124 | 67.03% | 53 | 28.65% | 2 | 1.08% | 6 | 3.24% | 0 | 0.00% | 71 | 38.38% | 185 |
| Chatham | 3,305 | 72.54% | 1,209 | 26.54% | 17 | 0.37% | 18 | 0.40% | 7 | 0.15% | 2,096 | 46.01% | 4,556 |
| Chattahoochee | 111 | 45.12% | 118 | 47.97% | 17 | 6.91% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | -7 | -2.85% | 246 |
| Chattooga | 437 | 36.39% | 716 | 59.62% | 28 | 2.33% | 9 | 0.75% | 11 | 0.92% | -279 | -23.23% | 1,201 |
| Cherokee | 326 | 29.32% | 665 | 59.80% | 100 | 8.99% | 6 | 0.54% | 15 | 1.35% | -339 | -30.49% | 1,112 |
| Clarke | 720 | 70.24% | 207 | 20.20% | 96 | 9.37% | 2 | 0.20% | 0 | 0.00% | 513 | 50.05% | 1,025 |
| Clay | 242 | 54.14% | 161 | 36.02% | 42 | 9.40% | 2 | 0.45% | 0 | 0.00% | 81 | 18.12% | 447 |
| Clayton | 248 | 42.61% | 223 | 38.32% | 99 | 17.01% | 11 | 1.89% | 1 | 0.17% | 25 | 4.30% | 582 |
| Clinch | 202 | 54.45% | 157 | 42.32% | 11 | 2.96% | 1 | 0.27% | 0 | 0.00% | 45 | 12.13% | 371 |
| Cobb | 889 | 54.54% | 548 | 33.62% | 174 | 10.67% | 18 | 1.10% | 1 | 0.06% | 341 | 20.92% | 1,630 |
| Coffee | 534 | 54.60% | 382 | 39.06% | 54 | 5.52% | 2 | 0.20% | 6 | 0.61% | 152 | 15.54% | 978 |
| Colquitt | 390 | 46.10% | 125 | 14.78% | 327 | 38.65% | 0 | 0.00% | 4 | 0.47% | 63[a] | 7.45% | 846 |
| Columbia | 144 | 42.11% | 12 | 3.51% | 185 | 54.09% | 1 | 0.29% | 0 | 0.00% | -41[a] | -11.99% | 342 |
| Coweta | 1,032 | 81.13% | 220 | 17.30% | 19 | 1.49% | 1 | 0.08% | 0 | 0.00% | 812 | 63.84% | 1,272 |
| Crawford | 285 | 83.58% | 24 | 7.04% | 32 | 9.38% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 253[a] | 74.19% | 341 |
| Crisp | 452 | 65.04% | 206 | 29.64% | 36 | 5.18% | 0 | 0.00% | 1 | 0.14% | 246 | 35.40% | 695 |
| Dade | 228 | 71.47% | 72 | 22.57% | 7 | 2.19% | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 3.76% | 156 | 48.90% | 319 |
| Dawson | 125 | 35.31% | 219 | 61.86% | 5 | 1.41% | 5 | 1.41% | 0 | 0.00% | -94 | -26.55% | 354 |
| De Kalb | 740 | 54.37% | 356 | 26.16% | 218 | 16.02% | 43 | 3.16% | 4 | 0.29% | 384 | 28.21% | 1,361 |
| Decatur | 782 | 53.75% | 537 | 36.91% | 131 | 9.00% | 4 | 0.27% | 1 | 0.07% | 245 | 16.84% | 1,455 |
| Dodge | 544 | 69.57% | 177 | 22.63% | 44 | 5.63% | 1 | 0.13% | 16 | 2.05% | 367 | 46.93% | 782 |
| Dooly | 507 | 58.48% | 271 | 31.26% | 87 | 10.03% | 2 | 0.23% | 0 | 0.00% | 236 | 27.22% | 867 |
| Dougherty | 583 | 78.05% | 158 | 21.15% | 6 | 0.80% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 425 | 56.89% | 747 |
| Douglas | 152 | 28.95% | 181 | 34.48% | 187 | 35.62% | 4 | 0.76% | 1 | 0.19% | -6[b] | -1.14% | 525 |
| Early | 375 | 53.65% | 173 | 24.75% | 136 | 19.46% | 3 | 0.43% | 12 | 1.72% | 202 | 28.90% | 699 |
| Echols | 140 | 90.32% | 15 | 9.68% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 125 | 80.65% | 155 |
| Effingham | 302 | 67.56% | 89 | 19.91% | 55 | 12.30% | 1 | 0.22% | 0 | 0.00% | 213 | 47.65% | 447 |
| Elbert | 714 | 62.63% | 103 | 9.04% | 305 | 26.75% | 18 | 1.58% | 0 | 0.00% | 409[a] | 35.88% | 1,140 |
| Emanuel | 549 | 35.19% | 530 | 33.97% | 473 | 30.32% | 8 | 0.51% | 0 | 0.00% | 19 | 1.22% | 1,560 |
| Fannin | 420 | 38.15% | 681 | 61.85% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | -261 | -23.71% | 1,101 |
| Fayette | 338 | 51.76% | 162 | 24.81% | 151 | 23.12% | 0 | 0.00% | 2 | 0.31% | 176 | 26.95% | 653 |
| Floyd | 1,204 | 58.82% | 677 | 33.07% | 138 | 6.74% | 25 | 1.22% | 3 | 0.15% | 527 | 25.74% | 2,047 |
| Forsyth | 150 | 26.04% | 345 | 59.90% | 79 | 13.72% | 1 | 0.17% | 1 | 0.17% | -195 | -33.85% | 576 |
| Franklin | 379 | 39.07% | 253 | 26.08% | 329 | 33.92% | 9 | 0.93% | 0 | 0.00% | 50[a] | 5.15% | 970 |
| Fulton | 4,790 | 58.89% | 2,906 | 35.73% | 190 | 2.34% | 165 | 2.03% | 83 | 1.02% | 1,884 | 23.16% | 8,134 |
| Gilmer | 360 | 40.63% | 519 | 58.58% | 4 | 0.45% | 3 | 0.34% | 0 | 0.00% | -159 | -17.95% | 886 |
| Glascock | 63 | 16.45% | 52 | 13.58% | 264 | 68.93% | 4 | 1.04% | 0 | 0.00% | -201[a] | -52.48% | 383 |
| Glynn | 467 | 59.95% | 298 | 38.25% | 12 | 1.54% | 2 | 0.26% | 0 | 0.00% | 169 | 21.69% | 779 |
| Gordon | 476 | 40.00% | 615 | 51.68% | 97 | 8.15% | 1 | 0.08% | 1 | 0.08% | -139 | -11.68% | 1,190 |
| Grady | 463 | 48.79% | 238 | 25.08% | 215 | 22.66% | 33 | 3.48% | 0 | 0.00% | 225 | 23.71% | 949 |
| Greene | 412 | 38.58% | 428 | 40.07% | 201 | 18.82% | 25 | 2.34% | 2 | 0.19% | -16 | -1.50% | 1,068 |
| Gwinnett | 677 | 41.01% | 541 | 32.77% | 392 | 23.74% | 38 | 2.30% | 3 | 0.18% | 136 | 8.24% | 1,651 |
| Habersham | 364 | 52.45% | 230 | 33.14% | 77 | 11.10% | 17 | 2.45% | 6 | 0.86% | 134 | 19.31% | 694 |
| Hall | 707 | 47.74% | 634 | 42.81% | 94 | 6.35% | 33 | 2.23% | 13 | 0.88% | 73 | 4.93% | 1,481 |
| Hancock | 457 | 74.80% | 80 | 13.09% | 71 | 11.62% | 2 | 0.33% | 1 | 0.16% | 377 | 61.70% | 611 |
| Haralson | 252 | 28.03% | 506 | 56.28% | 106 | 11.79% | 23 | 2.56% | 12 | 1.33% | -254 | -28.25% | 899 |
| Harris | 556 | 76.37% | 94 | 12.91% | 77 | 10.58% | 1 | 0.14% | 0 | 0.00% | 462 | 63.46% | 728 |
| Hart | 408 | 50.43% | 192 | 23.73% | 200 | 24.72% | 5 | 0.62% | 4 | 0.49% | 208[a] | 25.71% | 809 |
| Heard | 203 | 83.88% | 5 | 2.07% | 34 | 14.05% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 169[a] | 69.83% | 242 |
| Henry | 369 | 57.57% | 194 | 30.27% | 27 | 4.21% | 51 | 7.96% | 0 | 0.00% | 175 | 27.30% | 641 |
| Houston | 855 | 81.58% | 27 | 2.58% | 0 | 0.00% | 166 | 15.84% | 0 | 0.00% | 689[c] | 65.74% | 1,048 |
| Irwin | 388 | 65.54% | 174 | 29.39% | 30 | 5.07% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 214 | 36.15% | 592 |
| Jackson | 735 | 49.70% | 406 | 27.45% | 323 | 21.84% | 12 | 0.81% | 3 | 0.20% | 329 | 22.24% | 1,479 |
| Jasper | 557 | 75.27% | 155 | 20.95% | 28 | 3.78% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 402 | 54.32% | 740 |
| Jeff Davis | 172 | 50.74% | 156 | 46.02% | 11 | 3.24% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 16 | 4.72% | 339 |
| Jefferson | 373 | 50.54% | 361 | 48.92% | 0 | 0.00% | 4 | 0.54% | 0 | 0.00% | 12 | 1.63% | 738 |
| Jenkins | 188 | 59.31% | 53 | 16.72% | 76 | 23.97% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 112[a] | 35.33% | 317 |
| Johnson | 135 | 20.61% | 162 | 24.73% | 355 | 54.20% | 3 | 0.46% | 0 | 0.00% | -193[b] | -29.47% | 655 |
| Jones | 385 | 52.38% | 322 | 43.81% | 28 | 3.81% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 63 | 8.57% | 735 |
| Laurens | 957 | 41.90% | 730 | 31.96% | 594 | 26.01% | 0 | 0.00% | 3 | 0.13% | 227 | 9.94% | 2,284 |
| Lee | 337 | 56.54% | 252 | 42.28% | 7 | 1.17% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 85 | 14.26% | 596 |
| Liberty | 219 | 27.65% | 412 | 52.02% | 160 | 20.20% | 1 | 0.13% | 0 | 0.00% | -193 | -24.37% | 792 |
| Lincoln | 157 | 38.11% | 1 | 0.24% | 249 | 60.44% | 5 | 1.21% | 0 | 0.00% | -92[a] | -22.33% | 412 |
| Lowndes | 681 | 73.46% | 154 | 16.61% | 58 | 6.26% | 31 | 3.34% | 3 | 0.32% | 527 | 56.85% | 927 |
| Lumpkin | 261 | 54.49% | 218 | 45.51% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 43 | 8.98% | 479 |
| Macon | 350 | 51.47% | 196 | 28.82% | 131 | 19.26% | 3 | 0.44% | 0 | 0.00% | 154 | 22.65% | 680 |
| Madison | 560 | 68.29% | 170 | 20.73% | 89 | 10.85% | 0 | 0.00% | 1 | 0.12% | 390 | 47.56% | 820 |
| Marion | 217 | 47.07% | 155 | 33.62% | 89 | 19.31% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 62 | 13.45% | 461 |
| McDuffie | 157 | 30.78% | 25 | 4.90% | 323 | 63.33% | 5 | 0.98% | 0 | 0.00% | -166[a] | -32.55% | 510 |
| McIntosh | 147 | 47.73% | 161 | 52.27% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | -14 | -4.55% | 308 |
| Meriwether | 683 | 67.42% | 211 | 20.83% | 115 | 11.35% | 4 | 0.39% | 0 | 0.00% | 472 | 46.59% | 1,013 |
| Miller | 161 | 70.61% | 23 | 10.09% | 44 | 19.30% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 117[a] | 51.32% | 228 |
| Milton | 182 | 51.41% | 120 | 33.90% | 50 | 14.12% | 2 | 0.56% | 0 | 0.00% | 62 | 17.51% | 354 |
| Mitchell | 555 | 57.99% | 196 | 20.48% | 205 | 21.42% | 1 | 0.10% | 0 | 0.00% | 350[a] | 36.57% | 957 |
| Monroe | 456 | 54.55% | 162 | 19.38% | 217 | 25.96% | 0 | 0.00% | 1 | 0.12% | 239[a] | 28.59% | 836 |
| Montgomery | 414 | 46.99% | 254 | 28.83% | 213 | 24.18% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 160 | 18.16% | 881 |
| Morgan | 462 | 64.44% | 187 | 26.08% | 66 | 9.21% | 2 | 0.28% | 0 | 0.00% | 275 | 38.35% | 717 |
| Murray | 312 | 34.32% | 539 | 59.30% | 20 | 2.20% | 0 | 0.00% | 38 | 4.18% | -227 | -24.97% | 909 |
| Muscogee | 1,599 | 72.95% | 459 | 20.94% | 10 | 0.46% | 0 | 0.00% | 124 | 5.66% | 1,140 | 52.01% | 2,192 |
| Newton | 643 | 63.98% | 303 | 30.15% | 48 | 4.78% | 11 | 1.09% | 0 | 0.00% | 340 | 33.83% | 1,005 |
| Oconee | 136 | 31.85% | 51 | 11.94% | 240 | 56.21% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | -104[a] | -24.36% | 427 |
| Oglethorpe | 495 | 73.44% | 67 | 9.94% | 112 | 16.62% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 383[a] | 56.82% | 674 |
| Paulding | 256 | 23.75% | 630 | 58.44% | 188 | 17.44% | 3 | 0.28% | 1 | 0.09% | -374 | -34.69% | 1,078 |
| Pickens | 187 | 20.22% | 731 | 79.03% | 3 | 0.32% | 4 | 0.43% | 0 | 0.00% | -544 | -58.81% | 925 |
| Pierce | 295 | 57.06% | 150 | 29.01% | 72 | 13.93% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 145 | 28.05% | 517 |
| Pike | 727 | 67.44% | 230 | 21.34% | 121 | 11.22% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 497 | 46.10% | 1,078 |
| Polk | 492 | 33.24% | 901 | 60.88% | 74 | 5.00% | 10 | 0.68% | 3 | 0.20% | -409 | -27.64% | 1,480 |
| Pulaski | 651 | 79.20% | 107 | 13.02% | 64 | 7.79% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 544 | 66.18% | 822 |
| Putnam | 410 | 91.93% | 20 | 4.48% | 16 | 3.59% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 390 | 87.44% | 446 |
| Quitman | 87 | 47.03% | 31 | 16.76% | 66 | 35.68% | 1 | 0.54% | 0 | 0.00% | 21[a] | 11.35% | 185 |
| Rabun | 233 | 55.88% | 171 | 41.01% | 13 | 3.12% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 62 | 14.87% | 417 |
| Randolph | 522 | 53.65% | 366 | 37.62% | 83 | 8.53% | 0 | 0.00% | 2 | 0.21% | 156 | 16.03% | 973 |
| Richmond | 1,727 | 70.55% | 267 | 10.91% | 345 | 14.09% | 0 | 0.00% | 109 | 4.45% | 1,382[a] | 56.45% | 2,448 |
| Rockdale | 352 | 57.52% | 172 | 28.10% | 87 | 14.22% | 0 | 0.00% | 1 | 0.16% | 180 | 29.41% | 612 |
| Schley | 219 | 47.82% | 173 | 37.77% | 64 | 13.97% | 2 | 0.44% | 0 | 0.00% | 46 | 10.04% | 458 |
| Screven | 355 | 30.90% | 428 | 37.25% | 357 | 31.07% | 9 | 0.78% | 0 | 0.00% | 71[b] | 6.18% | 1,149 |
| Spalding | 725 | 73.08% | 199 | 20.06% | 29 | 2.92% | 22 | 2.22% | 17 | 1.71% | 526 | 53.02% | 992 |
| Stephens | 306 | 51.52% | 261 | 43.94% | 27 | 4.55% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 45 | 7.58% | 594 |
| Stewart | 415 | 61.12% | 241 | 35.49% | 23 | 3.39% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 174 | 25.63% | 679 |
| Sumter | 876 | 62.93% | 476 | 34.20% | 36 | 2.59% | 4 | 0.29% | 0 | 0.00% | 400 | 28.74% | 1,392 |
| Talbot | 408 | 69.39% | 129 | 21.94% | 44 | 7.48% | 5 | 0.85% | 2 | 0.34% | 279 | 47.45% | 588 |
| Taliaferro | 235 | 40.10% | 216 | 36.86% | 130 | 22.18% | 0 | 0.00% | 5 | 0.85% | 19 | 3.24% | 586 |
| Tattnall | 534 | 42.82% | 263 | 21.09% | 432 | 34.64% | 18 | 1.44% | 0 | 0.00% | 102[a] | 8.18% | 1,247 |
| Taylor | 253 | 44.00% | 159 | 27.65% | 163 | 28.35% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 90[a] | 15.65% | 575 |
| Telfair | 613 | 70.54% | 29 | 3.34% | 0 | 0.00% | 227 | 26.12% | 0 | 0.00% | 386[c] | 44.42% | 869 |
| Terrell | 528 | 73.03% | 142 | 19.64% | 53 | 7.33% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 386 | 53.39% | 723 |
| Thomas | 765 | 42.43% | 723 | 40.10% | 308 | 17.08% | 7 | 0.39% | 0 | 0.00% | 42 | 2.33% | 1,803 |
| Tift | 450 | 68.70% | 99 | 15.11% | 104 | 15.88% | 0 | 0.00% | 2 | 0.31% | 346[a] | 52.82% | 655 |
| Toombs | 282 | 48.37% | 200 | 34.31% | 98 | 16.81% | 3 | 0.51% | 0 | 0.00% | 82 | 14.07% | 583 |
| Towns | 196 | 40.08% | 291 | 59.51% | 2 | 0.41% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | -95 | -19.43% | 489 |
| Troup | 714 | 68.13% | 45 | 4.29% | 287 | 27.39% | 2 | 0.19% | 0 | 0.00% | 427[a] | 40.74% | 1,048 |
| Turner | 276 | 50.46% | 105 | 19.20% | 137 | 25.05% | 22 | 4.02% | 7 | 1.28% | 139[a] | 25.41% | 547 |
| Twiggs | 301 | 76.20% | 73 | 18.48% | 21 | 5.32% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 228 | 57.72% | 395 |
| Union | 344 | 44.85% | 418 | 54.50% | 5 | 0.65% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | -74 | -9.65% | 767 |
| Upson | 369 | 48.36% | 145 | 19.00% | 249 | 32.63% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 120[a] | 15.73% | 763 |
| Walker | 754 | 43.61% | 925 | 53.50% | 32 | 1.85% | 6 | 0.35% | 12 | 0.69% | -171 | -9.89% | 1,729 |
| Walton | 727 | 53.93% | 389 | 28.86% | 225 | 16.69% | 6 | 0.45% | 1 | 0.07% | 338 | 25.07% | 1,348 |
| Ware | 771 | 76.49% | 190 | 18.85% | 12 | 1.19% | 16 | 1.59% | 19 | 1.88% | 581 | 57.64% | 1,008 |
| Warren | 158 | 26.92% | 166 | 28.28% | 257 | 43.78% | 4 | 0.68% | 2 | 0.34% | -91[b] | -15.50% | 587 |
| Washington | 630 | 45.78% | 267 | 19.40% | 479 | 34.81% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 151[a] | 10.97% | 1,376 |
| Wayne | 394 | 65.34% | 144 | 23.88% | 34 | 5.64% | 30 | 4.98% | 1 | 0.17% | 250 | 41.46% | 603 |
| Webster | 114 | 44.36% | 117 | 45.53% | 26 | 10.12% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | -3 | -1.17% | 257 |
| White | 121 | 35.59% | 183 | 53.82% | 36 | 10.59% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | -62 | -18.24% | 340 |
| Whitfield | 586 | 40.05% | 775 | 52.97% | 36 | 2.46% | 6 | 0.41% | 60 | 4.10% | -189 | -12.92% | 1,463 |
| Wilcox | 380 | 72.66% | 120 | 22.94% | 22 | 4.21% | 1 | 0.19% | 0 | 0.00% | 260 | 49.71% | 523 |
| Wilkes | 557 | 65.53% | 65 | 7.65% | 216 | 25.41% | 12 | 1.41% | 0 | 0.00% | 341[a] | 40.12% | 850 |
| Wilkinson | 280 | 71.61% | 55 | 14.07% | 55 | 14.07% | 1 | 0.26% | 0 | 0.00% | 225 | 57.54% | 391 |
| Worth | 457 | 48.36% | 237 | 25.08% | 251 | 26.56% | 0 | 0.00% | 0 | 0.00% | 206[a] | 21.80% | 945 |
| Totals | 72,350 | 54.60% | 41,355 | 31.21% | 16,687 | 12.59% | 1,452 | 1.10% | 660 | 0.50% | 30,995 | 23.39% | 132,504 |
See also
[edit]Notes
[edit]- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z aa ab In this county where Taft ran third behind Bryan and Watson, margin given is Bryan vote minus Watson vote and percentage margin Bryan percentage minus Watson percentage.
- ^ a b c d In this county where Bryan ran third behind both Taft and Watson, margin given is Taft vote minus Watson vote and percentage margin Taft percentage minsu Watson percentage.
- ^ a b In this county where Chafin ran second ahead of both Taft and Watson, margin given is Bryan vote minus Chafin vote and percentage margin Bryan percentage minus Chafin percentage.
References
[edit]- ^ Mickey, Robert W.; Paths Out of Dixie: The Democratization of Authoritarian Enclaves in America's Deep South, 1944-1972, p. 76 ISBN 1400838789
- ^ Phillips, Kevin P.; The Emerging Republican Majority, pp. 208, 210 ISBN 9780691163246
- ^ Springer, Melanie Jean; How the States Shaped the Nation: American Electoral Institutions and Voter Turnout, 1920-2000, p. 155 ISBN 022611435X
- ^ a b Mickey, Robert W.; ‘The Beginning of the End for Authoritarian Rule in America: Smith v. Allwright and the Abolition of the White Primary in the Deep South, 1944-1948’; Studies in American Political Development, Vol. 22 (Fall 2008), pp. 143-182.
- ^ Perman, Michael; Struggle for Mastery: Disfranchisement in the South, 1888-1908; p. 274 ISBN 0807860255
- ^ Perman; Struggle for Mastery, p. 283
- ^ Perman; Struggle for Mastery, p. 297
- ^ a b Tindall, George B.; ‘Southern Strategy: A Historical Perspective’; North Carolina Historical Review; vol. 48, no. 2 (April 1971), pp. 126-141
- ^ de Santis, Vincent P.; ‘Republican Efforts to “Crack” the Democratic South’; The Review of Politics, vol. 14, no. 2 (April 1952), pp. 244-264
- ^ ‘Just Nonsense, Says Howell: So Georgia Editor Styles Talk of Taft Carrying Georgia’; The Atlanta Constitution, September 8, 1908, p. 2
- ^ ‘Situation Complicated: In Georgia and Taft Men Talk Seriously of Carrying the State’; Cincinnati Enquirer; October 18, 1908, p. 27
- ^ Menendez, Albert J.; The Geography of Presidential Elections in the United States, 1868-2004, p. 39 ISBN 0786422173
- ^ Dave Leip’s U.S. Election Atlas; 1908 Presidential General Election Results – Georgia
- ^ a b c d e Géoelections; Popular Vote at the Presidential Election for 1908 (.xlsx file for €30 including full minor party figures)
