Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Invention

Excess category

Thankyou America1000 for invitiong me to join the project, but IMHO think this is a category "too far" and I think the energy should be expended in maybe other Projects, such as Technology. Ta. Jabberwoch (talk) 19:00, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment on the WikiProject X proposal

Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject X is live!

Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Article alerts added

I have added article alerts to this WikiProject. I hope someone here finds it useful? Ottawahitech (talk) 11:01, 29 September 2016 (UTC)please ping me[reply]

Popular pages report

We – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month, Community Tech bot will post at Wikipedia:WikiProject Invention/Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of WikiProject Invention.

We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:

The pageview data includes both desktop and mobile data.
The report will include a link to the pageviews tool for each article, to dig deeper into any surprises or anomalies.
The report will include the total pageviews for the entire project (including redirects).

We're grateful to Mr.Z-man for his original Mr.Z-bot, and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of WikiProject Invention, and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at m:User talk:Community Tech bot.

Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

National invention categories

See Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Technology#National invention categories Andy Dingley (talk) 22:34, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hatnote

Should there be a hatnote pointing to Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day? WP:A11 specifically uses "invented". LaundryPizza03 (talk) 12:40, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A new newsletter directory is out!

A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.

– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Inventions by century

Help me expand the Category:Inventions by century tree! –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 01:24, 3 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of Chinese inventions

I have nominated List of Chinese inventions for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 22:34, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of Chinese inventions

I have nominated List of Chinese inventions for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Gun Powder Ma (talk) 18:42, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!

Hello,
Please note that Invention, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of Today's articles for improvement. The article was scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Today's articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing!
_{Delivered by — MusikBot ^talk 00:05, 1 June 2020 (UTC) on behalf of the TAFI team}[reply]

Similar/confusing articles

I am confused by these articles that have similar titles and unclear scopes.

Timeline of historic inventions (WikiProject Invention|class=list|importance=top): I was reading this article and became confused when I got to the 21st century because there were only two inventions listed.
History of technology : I don't know the difference. But it clearly has a difference approach and structure.
Timeline of scientific discoveries: This one seems slightly different in title. But some sort of clear disambiguating statement would be helpful to fight entropy.

I didn't do any sort of systematic search, so I have no idea how many other similar articles there may be.
All of these articles are "claimed" by multiple WikiProjects.

-Tom Haws (talk) 03:27, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!

Hello,
Please note that List of pre-Columbian inventions and innovations of indigenous Americans, which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of Today's articles for improvement. The article is scheduled to appear on Wikipedia's Community portal in the "Today's articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing!
_{Delivered by — MusikBot ^talk 00:05, 16 November 2020 (UTC) on behalf of the TAFI team}[reply]

Merger proposal

I have proposed that Inventor be merged into Invention. Please see Talk:Invention#Merger proposal, and share your opinions. Cnilep (talk) 05:55, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cheman Shaik up for deletion

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Cheman Shaik (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs|google) AfD discussion

Indian inventor. Question of notability and sourcing. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:33, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User script to detect unreliable sources

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like

John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14.

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Project-independent quality assessments

Quality assessments by Wikipedia editors rate articles in terms of completeness, organization, prose quality, sourcing, etc. Most wikiprojects follow the general guidelines at Wikipedia:Content assessment, but some have specialized assessment guidelines. A recent Village pump proposal was approved and has been implemented to add a |class= parameter to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, which can display a general quality assessment for an article, and to let project banner templates "inherit" this assessment.

No action is required if your wikiproject follows the standard assessment approach. Over time, quality assessments will be migrated up to {{WikiProject banner shell}}, and your project banner will automatically "inherit" any changes to the general assessments for the purpose of assigning categories.

However, if your project has decided to "opt out" and follow a non-standard quality assessment approach, all you have to do is modify your wikiproject banner template to pass {{WPBannerMeta}} a new |QUALITY_CRITERIA=custom parameter. If this is done, changes to the general quality assessment will be ignored, and your project-level assessment will be displayed and used to create categories, as at present. Aymatth2 (talk) 15:53, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Inquiry on draft for article topic: Leigh Rothschild

Hello, I wanted to get some feedback, as well as assistance on a draft article I've been infrequently working on. The topic of said article is about individual Leigh Rothschild, a somewhat notorious individual in the tech sphere, particularly for patent troll actions and behavior.

The reason for his notoriety is his holding of a numerous amount of patents, either directly or through a holding company. For example, they've been mentioned multiple times by the EFF, as well as having a suit filed against him earlier this year by Valve Corporation.

Jzpelaez (talk) 01:54, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Wright brothers

Wright brothers has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:56, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Joining project

Eyo new to this, I've been editing the page List of Israeli inventions and discoveries for a while as it's been very poorly maintained for the most part with a lot of Companys/patents or just false attributes being applied to it. I've been looking for some project like this to align on what can go in these pages. Is there a way to join or what? Galdrack (talk) 12:30, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]