Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Electronic music/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Categorization

Current structure

Here's roughly how the hierarchy looks now (there's a lot of incosistency though): 

Electronic music
    Electronic music festivals
        <festival>
    Electronic music genres
        Subgenre
            Sub-subgenre (style)
                ...
            <subgenre artists, albums, concepts, etc.> (messy at this level)
        <subgenre>
    Electronic music instruments
        Drum Machines
        Effects units
        ...
    Musical software
        Audio programming languages
        Music file formats
        ...
        <software>
    Electronic musicians
        Electronic music groups
            Subgenre groups
        Electronic musicians by country
            Nationality electronic musicians
            Nationality electronic music
        Electronic musicians by genre
            Subgenre musicians
                Subgenre groups
    Sampling
        <sampling>

Note: Lines enclosed in <> denote article level.

Proposed structure

Here's a proposal for restructuring the categories. Please comment or propose other ways to do this. 

 Electronic music
     Electronic music artists
         Electronic music artists by country
             Nationality electronic music artists (e.g. British electronic music artists)
                 Nationality electronic music groups
         Electronic music artists by genre
             Subgenre artists (e.g. Ambient music artists)
         Electronic music groups
             Subgenre groups
     Electronic music festivals
     Electronic music genres
         Subgenre
             Subgenre artists
                 Subgenre groups
             Subgenre releases
                 Subgenre albums
                 Subgenre singles
             Sub-subgenre (style) (e.g. Goa in Trance category)
                 ...
     Electronic music production
         Electronic music instruments
         Musical software
         Sampling
     Electronic music releases
         Electronic music albums
         Electronic music singles
         Subgenre releases

Only category levels listed.

Relevant documentation:

Other musical genres for comparison:

Hagbard Celine 18:11, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

Okay, it's been a while since anyone looked at this, but things are not done yet by a long shot. WikiProject Musicians recommends the following for individual musicians falling under a particular genre, in theory:
         Electronic musicians by nationality
             <Nationality> electronic musicians (e.g. British electronic music artists)
                 <Nationality> electronic musicians by <instrument>
                     <Nationality> electronic <instrumentalists>
         Electronic musicians by instrument
             Electronic <instrumentalists>
                 Electronic <instrumentalists> by nationality
                     <Nationality> electronic <instrumentalists>
(See Wikipedia:WikiProject Musicians/Categorization/Progress for the system at work.) Of course, things are probably not going to end up like this, because we frankly don't know where Category:Electronic musicians by genre fits. It's certainly going to have to fit somewhere because I can't see us actually making a category called "Electronic keyboardists by nationality" or "Electronic music producers by nationality", without subcategorizing it by electronic music subgenres; eg. "Synthpop keyboardists by nationality" or "House music producers by nationality".
Also, we haven't done anything about musical groups yet.
If anyone is watching this at all, we could use some input about this. –Unint 19:41, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
I started splitting and sorting categories by biggest nationalities and subgenres. For start I'm going to use "xxxx musicians" and "xxxx music groups". (where xxxx is genre/subgenre) Monni 23:20, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
Excellent work so far on reviving a mostly-forgotten task! –Unint 06:02, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
I didn't forget it at all... I was just working on the stub categories first. I'm going through house and dance musicians right now and then possibly double check techno musicians after that. I will be separating musicians and musical groups (bands, project groups etc.) while I go through the categories with CatScan. Monni 15:53, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

Groups

I was going through groups of several different genres and found...

Category:American electronic music groups

Category:British electronic music groups

Category:German electronic music groups

I think these need proper populating.

Monni 19:02, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

Stub sorting

I've added a proposal for new stub categories ({{electronic-musician-stub}}, {{electronic-music-stub}}) on the stub sorting project page. Hagbard Celine 10:47, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

Stub sorting project suggested {{electronic-album-stub}} too. Hagbard Celine 14:13, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

Worked my way through the Musician stubs category and stub-sorted the entries I recognised by name into Electronic musician stubs. I've moved about 150 entries, but I'm sture there's still many entries that should be moved. We should take a look at the Category:Electronic musicians categories and mark anything appropriate as stubs too. Hagbard Celine 16:36, 30 November 2005 (UTC)

Created {{electronic-album-stub}} (Category:Electronic album stubs). Started to stub-sort from Category:Album stubs, but realised that there should be a top-level electronic music album category to put all entries without any categories into before proceeding. Hagbard Celine 13:54, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

WikiProject template

The project template ({{Electronic-music-project}}) has been added to Electronica and Breakbeat genres and subgenres talk-pages and I've done some minor cleanup on many of those articles. We should probably add the template to the other genre and subgenre talk-pages and any other relevant pages.

I'm not sure if there's any point in leaving the {{genre}} template, but I haven't removed it from anywhere yet. Hagbard Celine 12:52, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

Finished tagging Ambient articles. Hagbard Celine 14:11, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

To monitor recent changes to articles related to electronic music, I've created the page Wikipedia:WikiProject_Electronic_music/Electronic_music_recent_changes. Changes to articles listed on that page will show up on the special page Special:Recentchangeslinked/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Electronic_music/Electronic_music_recent_changes. Hagbard Celine 09:52, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

Lobo Halcyon

Has anyone noticed this link to racefortheprize dot com on any of the electronic pages? For the record, this links to the page for Lobo Halcyon, an electronic artist who doesn't seem to come up on AllMusicGuide. Does anyone know anything about him? --JB Adder | Talk 11:29, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

No, and why did you link it here? Sorry, just particularly sensitive after cleaning the external link hell that Electronic music was. Could you explain your question further? (removed link) ∴ here…♠ 07:05, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
Sorry about the linking, my fault. Now, about the link; basically, this artist link has been appearing on some of the electronic music pages (I've noticed it on, and removed it from, Downtempo, and Karol Langner found it on Trip hop), added, working from the edit history, by 88.107.86.73. This, as has been stated below, is not the IP for the artist. I have my theories as to who (in a more broad, general sense) may have done this, but I'll keep my reservations about revealing them, because I just may be wrong.
All I ask of everyone is, if you find this link on any of the other electronic pages, to remove it without delay. --JB Adder | Talk 00:19, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

I'm Lobo Halcyon, and I don't know why I have been added to any page here. I am not a major artist. Who has been doing this any ideas?

Category:Electronica songs

Should this category be at Category:Electronic songs instead? Seems to me that electronica is a subgenre? If so, how should I move it? --Qirex 06:02, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

although i don't mormally deal with individual song pages, i'd agree with your point. to move it you'd simply copy the [edited] content from here to here then change the category code on each individual page with the old one to the new one.

MusicBrainz

I see you have the MusicBrainz templates cited as resources. I've started a wikiproject to link applicable articles to MusicBrainz. Information on it can be found here and here. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 12:16, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Ishkur's Guide to Electronic Music

i created Ishkur's Guide to Electronic Music a few hours ago but it's already up for afd. is the site notable enough for the article to warrent existing? --MilkMiruku 00:24, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

I listed it for afd. Feel free to write a section into an appropriate article if you think it deserves attention beyond the already present external links. The page ranks 350,000+ on Alexa and does not, in my opinion, deserve it's own article. ∴ here…♠ 00:41, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Ishkur's site is a joke. A micky-take. The creator knows nor cares little for electronic music. Please stop using that site as a reference work.

Then why is it listed at the bottom of the project page under resources? It should be removed. T-1 01:53, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

Removed. T-1 16:43, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

"The creator knows nor cares little for electronic music." What a joke.. and the site while humorous is a popular source on genre information particularly for the uninitiated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.241.133.201 (talk) 13:19, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Dance music

I've posted this at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music genres#Dance music as well, but this concerns both projects.

I'd like to bring up something which I think needs considerable clarification: the connection between dance music and electronic music. (There's also the Electronic Dance article, but people are proposing merging it into electronic music altogether.)

What we have currently are Category:Dance music and Category:Electronic music, and some of the contents of the former almost certainly fits into the latter — house, techno, trance and the like are often bunched into the label of "dance music", but that isn't really a category that's been integrated under the genre system here. (See dance music and dance-pop, for example, which don't have genreboxes.) "Dance" is too broad a term because it encompasses some of electronic music and some of pop music. However, a lot of articles (such as those using Template:Album infobox, some instance of which I was responsible for) link to the dance music article when discussing electronic dance music, even though half of that article does not apply to electronic dance music.

What I'm proposing, basically, is a clear division between traditional dance music and electronic dance music, since they don't really connect to each other. Expand the article more on both sides, or split it altogether. Integrate items in Category:Dance music into Category:Electronic music. Meanwhile, I think the Electronic Dance article could be expanded so that it can be the primary article linked to in the context of electronic dance music.

Apologies if I'm not being too specific here. I'm not any kind of expert on the subjects in question, but I know enough to see that there is a clear distinction that needs to be addressed. –Unint 04:32, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

I wholly agree to this position. Rootless 12:17, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Sparks

A request for a peer review of the Sparks article has been made here Wikipedia:Peer review/Sparks (band)/archive2. Please have a look and maybe help it alongKaptKos 19:42, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

userbox

  • I created a userbox for this WikiProject, which you can add to your User Page. Feel free to edit the image that is displayed in it if you have a better one. Wickethewok 22:49, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

WP:KLF

Just a heads up for you: The KLF is now a featured article, and WP:KLF has been set up to further improve articles about that band on Wikipedia. I'm sure we'd be happy to work as a sister or possibly a child Project; if that's an issue (i.e. if there's any possibility of "turf wars") please come to our talk page. In the meantime, we'll be busy working on articles :) --kingboyk 21:40, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Crazy rantings by some guy

I have a question for music fans: are you aware that electronic music is not electronic dance music? Did you ever realize that no university in the USA regards electronic music and the music for dancing as the same genre? Are you aware that this is not a music magazine? Do you know the meaning of the term encyclopedic? Do you know the difference between idiomatic expressions, slang and encyclopedic (formal) language? Are you aware that most of articles claiming to deal with "electronic music subgenres" are unsourced or grounded only on independent websites?Brian W 23:58, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

And who is none? You and just less than a dozen Wikipedians, I suppose. Instead, I suggest you to try to answear to each question I posted above, otherwise you'll look just pathetic. Brian W 21:08, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

  • I have no idea what you are talking about and have no desire to answer your questions. I have no idea what you are trying to prove and accomplish. Also, please stop posting this same message on people's talk pages. If you are having a specific problem with an article, discuss it there. Wickethewok 04:06, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
  • If indeed you'll stop your rants about this, I believe the answer to each of your questions is yes. Wickethewok 04:20, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Brian: (1) I'd love to see you give a citation for your claim that *no US university* ... etc. Are you referring strictly to Universities? ALL the teachers in ALL of them? How about colleges, music schools? I don't think you can backup that claim. Are you a 'purist'? Are you irritated by 'little people'?? (2) Let's suppose it's true that no university thinks 'electronic music' and 'techno' (common parlance:house/techno/trance/d'n'b, et. al) are the same thing. So what? Rock 'n' roll was around years before any high school bands were allowed to play any (sorry, you give your citation first); Jazz was around for decades before anyone would take it seriously, etc. Just because everyone working with 'techno' is not closeted away worrying about microsound, and granular, or whatever the latest academic in situ trend is, doesn't mean that the two are separate, except perhaps in the minds of academics who are PO'd because nobody's heard of them. Electronic music is: music made primarily with electronics. Maybe my Virus is not as heavy as your Moog coffin, if this is a penis thing. Twang 03:20, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Joe: I guess the guy was trying to make a distinction between electronic art music, like that of Varese or Stockhausen, versus electronic pop music, like that of BT or Kraftwerk. I guess it doesn't really matter... but maybe someone should come up with a way to differentiate between the two, so that someone reading about Stockhausen doesn't end up in some page about IDM. By the way, I'd like to see an article about the tape recorder as a musical instrument (that's how I ended up here). JoeMaffei 14 September 2006

More on the moron... (couldn't resist the alliteration) Maybe he meant that, since the distinction between subgenres of electronic music is so abstract, it's something that can't really be classified, so it can't be part of an encyclopedia. What he forgets is that this isn't an encyclopedia... this is Wikipedia. It's a new thing, baby, get used to it. Anonymous

Apologies for jumpiing in on an old discussion, but I'm a new member and hadn't read it before.

I respectfully disagree with whoever said that electronic music is unrelated to electronic dance music.

I frankly don't care that "no university" in the USA recognises electronic dance/pop music as being electronic music, but it is. IMO electronica owes far more to classical music than it does to rock music. To my mind, there is a direct line of evolution between the experimental electronic 'art' music of Stockhausen et al, and the upbeat techno-trance, IDM and so forth that makes up today's electronic 'pop' music. Electronic music is a broad category and should include both art music and pop music, because in many cases, there's a blurred line between the two. If it were up to me, I'd have the universities redefine what constitutes 'electronic music' so that it does incorporate electronic dance music and other forms of popular music that uses loops and samples.

Electronic (art) music is the same thing as electronic dance music; it evolved from precisely the same experiments and ideas. To deny this is to be elitist, but then I guess that's what they are. --Steve Farrell 22:53, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

No need to worry about that too much; the user who did say that has been banned indefinitely. Welcome to the project; let's hope the next major discussion will be under happier terms. –Unint 00:21, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

Techno music/Hardcore dance music footers

The article on Gabber has been moved from Gabber music to Gabber. Could the techno music/Hardcore dance music footers be altered? Br, Brz7 11:52, 26 June 2006 (UTC)

Ah, I've just made a bunch of changes here... got rid of techno stuff in the hardcore section (and vice versa), made hardcore techno the main page, created a template for hardcore, created a category for hardcore genres, sorted footers out as needed and tried to make the list of sub-genres and stuff a bit more unified between all of this. I'm sure there'll be complaints, but I'd not seen much movement and thought I'd take a stab spiralx 21:09, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Good/featured article

  • I'd like to propose that we direct some of our efforts towards getting an electronic music article to "Good Article" and then "Featured Article" status. I think the hardest part of this will be locating reliable sources, so for those of you who have large back-catalogues of music magazines, you'd be a big help. I think it'd be easiest to start with either a well-known artist or group (rather than say, a specific genre) as it would be easier to find material on them. I would suggest either The Orb or Sasha, but of course I would like to hear other peoples' ideas. Wickethewok 13:10, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
  • C'mon folkses. Don't you guys wanna be put this group to some good use? Teamwork and all that. Remember, you get to choose whatever we work on. Wickethewok 19:33, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
I'm all for it — not that I have access to anything like what you're talking about. I mean, look at how The KLF made it to FA: just two editors, but they have one fansite that exhastively collects everything available. Other artists, especially more recent phenomena, aren't so fortunate. I have a few pet projects I've been working on — though working entirely on online sources.
One thought, though — I'd like to see a recent electronic dance single make it to FA. I mean, here is a chance to document the cultural significance of such songs, which I think is lacking in the mainstream. Of course, that's exactly why it's also hard to find verifiable sources... –Unint 22:39, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
Music Genres are very much undefined. Although there is some level of similarity throughout the largescale list of genres, basically they're going to be very hard to get defined. If there were some definitive source on music genres however, I would love to use it. I'd ultimately like to see some Electronica music genres as featured. Just to throw out some suggestions, we could use something like Trance or IDM to help the general population explain the difference between Techno and Electronica. FreeLance FoX 03:16, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
I stubled upon RoJaRo.com the other day. It's a database of magazine article subjects from music magazines, so you can search a band and see what magazines had ran articles on them. Could be a useful resource here. Pimlottc 20:27, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Alexander Coe

Wikipedia 1.0 Assessments

I've updated your project template to support (in the most basic fashion) Wikipedia 1.0 Assessments. If you want to use this system (and I think having looked at the bot-created Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/The KLF articles by quality, Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/The KLF articles by quality statistics and Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/The KLF articles by quality log you probably will!) I'm quite happy to help you get the template updated further to display an assessment, provide instructions, and transclude comments about the state of an article and what work it needs. If you want to go with this and need help either drop me a line on my talk page or post at Wikipedia 1.0 Assessments. --kingboyk 10:04, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

The KLF discography

hi, just to inform you that the article The KLF discography is currently up for Featured List Candidacy. Please vote "support" or "object" with your comments at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/The KLF discography. cheers! Zzzzz 12:21, 13 August 2006 (UTC)

Fuck the Millennium

Hello, greetings again from WP:KLF. Fuck the Millennium is currently up for Featured Article Candidacy. Please vote "support" or "object" with your comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Fuck the Millennium. Over and out! --kingboyk 13:46, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Peer review

WP:KLF have two articles up for peer review, and would appreciate your feedback.

All You Need Is Love (The JAMs song)

Whitney Joins The JAMs

--kingboyk 15:01, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

Dead?

Is this project inactive/dead? Sure seems to be! :( --kingboyk 22:19, 22 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Not quite, king, but almost it seems. It was never that active in the first place though, at least not since I've been here. I always thought it was strange how few electronic music listening editors there are here, especially considering how present we are online. Keep up the nice KLF stuff, mate, I currently have Alexander Coe up at FAC right now btw. Cheers and what have you! Wickethewok 22:44, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
  • This project seems to be going nowhere. Perhaps mark it inactive or consider merging with another larger project? (WP Musicians perhaps?) --kingboyk 14:54, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Most editors in electronic music seem to edit more about their area of expertise, so there isn't much collaboration at the moment. I'm really surprised there isn't more material on Wikipedia regarding electronic music considering the large web presence of fans. In the future, I will attempt to provide a response in any peer reviews, FACs, feedback requests, etc.. that people post here. I would suggest that other editors who are currently following this project do the same, regardless of their interest in the specific article subject. Wickethewok 16:46, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

KLF

Fuck the Millennium is now a featured article (hooray!) but The KLF discography's featured list candidacy failed (hiss!).

Our next nomination for Featured Article is Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/All You Need Is Love (The JAMs song), about the debut single released by the Justified Ancients of Mu Mu all the way back in 1987. Please have a look at the article and voice your opinion in the FAC. --kingboyk 09:48, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

DJing

I added Category:DJing to the project; it certainly belongs here if Category:DJs does.

There should be an article describing what a DJ does: the whole point of DJing (creating a new whole out of ready-made tracks, creating a suitable atmosphere in the venue, maybe making people dance), basic DJing styles (playing tracks end-to-end and talking between them; playing tracks end-to-end cross-fading between them; beatmatching and making long mixes between tracks as done in electronic dance music; scratching), basic explanation of DJ techniques (now spread among a multitude of articles). I'm not sure it belongs to the disk jockey article, it seems to me that a new article (DJing?) is needed.

Oh, and I'm hereby volunteering to do parts of it. Rootless 12:48, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

  • I think that would be a good idea. Maybe just start off with the "Techniques" section from Disc jockey and maybe expand it into an article called DJ techniques or something similar. I agree with you that there does need to be an article unifying the techniques you mentioned. Wickethewok 16:46, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
    • There's this thing about performance, affecting people's mood and building the set. It probably falls under Job description, but I don't know where to start and how to write it without sounding pathetic and maintain NPOV. Also, the job of radio DJs is probably different, and I don't really know what it is. Rootless 02:49, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Project Directory

Hello. The WikiProject Council is currently in the process of developing a master directory of the existing WikiProjects to replace and update the existing Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory. These WikiProjects are of vital importance in helping wikipedia achieve its goal of becoming truly encyclopedic. Please review the following pages:

and make any changes to the entries for your project that you see fit. There is also a directory of portals, at User:B2T2/Portal, listing all the existing portals. Feel free to add any of them to the portals or comments section of your entries in the directory. The three columns regarding assessment, peer review, and collaboration are included in the directory for both the use of the projects themselves and for that of others. Having such departments will allow a project to more quickly and easily identify its most important articles and its articles in greatest need of improvement. If you have not already done so, please consider whether your project would benefit from having departments which deal in these matters. It is my hope to have the existing directory replaced by the updated and corrected version of the directory above by November 1. Please feel free to make any changes you see fit to the entries for your project before then. If you should have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you. B2T2 21:33, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Sorry if you tried to update it before, and the corrections were gone. I have now put the new draft in the old directory pages, so the links should work better. My apologies for any confusion this may have caused you. B2T2 00:22, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject Synthesizers

I'm thinking of starting a new WikiProject to document notable synthesizers and their influence. If this is something that you'd be interested in helping with, please add your name to the proposal. --Mperry 23:05, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia Day Awards

Hello, all. It was initially my hope to try to have this done as part of Esperanza's proposal for an appreciation week to end on Wikipedia Day, January 15. However, several people have once again proposed the entirety of Esperanza for deletion, so that might not work. It was the intention of the Appreciation Week proposal to set aside a given time when the various individuals who have made significant, valuable contributions to the encyclopedia would be recognized and honored. I believe that, with some effort, this could still be done. My proposal is to, with luck, try to organize the various WikiProjects and other entities of wikipedia to take part in a larger celebrartion of its contributors to take place in January, probably beginning January 15, 2007. I have created yet another new subpage for myself (a weakness of mine, I'm afraid) at User talk:Badbilltucker/Appreciation Week where I would greatly appreciate any indications from the members of this project as to whether and how they might be willing and/or able to assist in recognizing the contributions of our editors. Thank you for your attention. Badbilltucker 17:56, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Wikiproject boost

  • We need more active members at Wikipedia:WikiProject Electronic music. So please tell your friends who like electronic music and are willing to put in hours writing about it. If there are any suggestions for features for this Wikiproject I will help out with them and see what I can do. Please add any projects you are working on to the list - I will gladly help out with them as best I can. Since the original project founder has been MIA for 9 months or so, I'm declaring myself pseudo-king of this temporarily abandoned lot known as the talk page of this WikiProject. Basically, that probably means that I'm just going to do the most work directly related to member organization/cheerleading/WikiProject files/etc for now at least. For anyone who is reading this: PLEASE TELL YOUR WIKI AND REAL-LIFE FRIENDS WHO ARE INTERESTED IN ELECTRONIC MUSIC ABOUT THIS PROJECT! We need active members! Wickethewok 11:06, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
I don't think this project has been abandoned at all... People are still working on the categorization. Monni 11:39, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
  • I understand that, but there is not much collaboration at the moment, which is the primary purpose of WikiProjects. That is, people don't really say what they are working on, thus allowing others to easily assist them and request help on articles. I, for one, would really like to help others get electronic music articles up to GA/FA levels.Wickethewok 19:47, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
  • I hope others mention what they are doing. Some participants have added their names to the participants list and went on doing their own thing, which is cool, but not really helpful in terms of collaboration. I think it'd be awesome to get an article like house music to FA, but something broad and major like that would probably take multiple highly-involved editors.Wickethewok 21:45, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
    • Glad to hear from you again — I can't think of anyone better-suited for the job. Unfortunately, that's because I don't know anyone else, either on- or off-wiki, with the interest and enthusiasm to match (to say nothing of actual knowledge).
    • I suppose working on my own list niche topics is what I've been doing; I am not at the point where I could contemplate working on a topic as big as Sasha. Belated congratulations on that, by the way.
    • However! I'm also working on obtaining sources in print, which should be useful towards larger, more general-purpose articles. I have a few things on hand, but not sure when I'll get around to it. (I have also noticed at least one article where people have said that sources can't be found at all; ask me later, if this is a challenge anyone wants to work on.) –Unint 22:01, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Heya, Unint! Thanks, I'm glad I finally got my first FA. I agree that the general articles need work. I think I might try to tackle a couple of the more general subjects, too, like house music or trance music, which both are in dire need of sourcing/re-organization/etc. Getting a general-type article like that up to even a GA would be quite an accomplishment. Wickethewok 16:34, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
  • something i've come across lately that could be a killer article is Beats (music). hip-hop-centric at present, but has potential for a really good article on drum loops in general, imo. --Kaini 03:55, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Hmmm, I'm not sure about what the Beats article is supposed to be about exactly. I don't know too much about hip hop, so I'm not sure of the article's scope. Should it maybe be integrated into something like music loop or something? Wickethewok 16:34, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Article tagging/rating

  • Feel free to use the parameters "class" (valid values: Stub, Start, B, GA, A, FA) and "importance" (valid values: Top, High, Mid, Low) when putting {{electronic-music-project}} on talk pages. As a general rule of thumb, I would say the major genres (house, techno, ambient, etc...) and similarly important core topics get Top importance, major artists, subgenres, labels, etc... get High importance, minor subgenres and not-as-important artists get Mid importance, and less important artists and obscure topics would get Low importance. When assigning articles ratings, ask yourself theoretical comparisons: is this as important to someone's understanding of electronic music as synthesizer (clearly a Top importanc article)? As important as DJ Tiesto (very influential, a clear High rating)? As important as Orbus Terrarum (album by influential artist, achieved some chart success, widely sold - seems like a Mid to me)? Or more like Gab Olivier (artist that meets WP:MUSIC, but no charting songs or last influence)? The ten-year test seems pretty applicable here for articles regarding active subjects (will anyone remember this subject ten years from now? will it have cultural significance to electronic music?). Anyways, these are all suggestions of course. The only rule for rating right now I think should be to use common sense. Also, for possibly controversial ratings, leave your brief reasoning in the relevant edit summary. If anyone else does or plans to do this sort of tagging, please leave your comments on how you rate articles in terms of importance to the WikiProject, as this seems like something that should be standardized. Wickethewok 08:16, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Under my proposed guidelines above, no artists would be rated as Top. Top would be reserved for broad articles, though having some of the key figures, like Kraftwerk, Brian Eno, etc... might be just as essential. I would have no objections if some really important artists were in the Top category. When I get a little break from school, hopefully I'll get a chance to maybe codify the above proposed guidelines, so that others can edit them easily to the point of consesus. Of course, anyone can go ahead and do that if they are so inclined. Wickethewok 22:03, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Fyi, I tidied up and fixed some bugs in the template. You can also use the shortcut {{WPEM}} instead of the longer {{electronic-music-project}}. I also added the term "priority", which seems better to use as "importance" and is used more prevalently by other WikiProjects, though importance is still accepted as a parameter. The categories, such as "low importance electronic music articles", should probably be "low priority..." instead as well. Anyways, so now on a low priority stub article, you could use {{WPEM |priority=low |class=stub}}, though you should still be able to use anything you used before as well. Wickethewok 07:03, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
  • I think The Shamen should be at the top rating allowed by the project, and of course Kraftwerk must be. That said, wik's idea of having only overview articles as Top and everything else maxed out at High isn't a bad idea at all imho... --kingboyk 01:42, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Drum Club

Anyone fancy starting an article on the Drum Club? (fairly important duo and club night in the history of UK dance music). --kingboyk 17:17, 18 January 2007 (UTC) PS I'm currently not very active on Wikipedia, so if you could keep an eye on KLF articles it would be appreciated! In particular, preventing the addition of subpar material to the FAs is quite important.

Thank you Mr Wickethewok! I'm pretty sure it was also a club night, run by the same guys? --kingboyk 01:43, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

New project

We've got some overlap with Wikipedia:WikiProject New Wave music. I think I will link us up, for a start. –Unint 05:58, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

should there be a footer template for garage related styles, akin to

et al, containing (for example):

4x4 Garage | 2step | Dubstep | Garage | Grime | Speed Garage

Stevekeiretsu 00:35, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

I notice that all but two of those are part of the main article, and grime, by the looks of it, is not entirely descended from garage. I'd suggest that there aren't so many articles that a navigational tool is needed. –Unint 23:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Deletion nom notice

List of notable trance music records. Salvageable? –Unint 23:19, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Its a good idea for an article. Does anyone have a better definition for a good list of landmark records of trance music? Maybe like "List of influential trance music records" or something. Anyways, maybe a move to user space where it can be sourced and the list better defined/comprehensive is a good idea. Wickethewok 23:27, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
  • I could probably make it one of my source-searching projects, but it would take far longer than the AfD would last, and I don't even have that kind of time right now. Also, from a cursory search I've mainly been able to find sources calling one track or another a "smash hit" or somesuch, but few that actually contextualize their popularity. –Unint 05:39, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
  • I have tentatively set up a (heavily) trimmed version of the article (fully sourced and referenced) on my user space here (with talk page) which might serve as a starting point for improving the present article. In the meantime, I would appreciate if you could contribute to the AfD discussion, especially if you are an expert in the area. Including 2 inactive participants, the vote is presently 4 out of 6 is favour of deletion. Ayla 14:30, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
  • I'm undecided. Coming from a non-expert perspective, I think there's a need for information like this, due to the sprawling, unnavigatable market if nothing else. However, the fact that clubs are the main outlet of this stuff makes it particularly tricky to obtain a standard of verifiable information beyond word-of-mouth (hard to track down dance chart records or DJ publications, for instance). I'm also thinking that maybe this would work better as a narrative timeline with much more in-detail context; however, given the amount of published information that exists, is that even feasible? –Unint 18:50, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
  • The only 'authoritative' publication I've found so far is Ministry of Sound's Fifteen:50, which still has the problem of not formalising the criteria used to evaluate the tracks (DJ opinions, public polls, and so on). I agree that a narrative timeline which also explains the context of the tracks' success would be a better alternative; however, as you said, the published information on this is disappointingly sparse, and is often too informal to qualify for encyclopaedic referencing (for example, Ishkur's Guide to Electronic Music). Ayla 10:53, 27 February 2007 (UTC)


The Orb FAC

New article

You may like to know that The Elephant Table Album finally has an article. Totnesmartin 20:49, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

For me personally it was a formative experience - the music I do now is still influenced by the spirit of that album. Totnesmartin 14:29, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Hello

Heya, everyone! I'm a new wikipedia editor, but I'm learning very quickly. I listen to many genres of EDM, but mostly Drum n Bass and Breaks. I would very much like to help improve articles in these categories. I added my username to the list of participants in the wikiproject, and I added the userbox to my user page. Thank you for providing a centralized place to organize efforts in this area! nrwilk talk 17:30, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Hey, a quick question!

I'm a fan of electronic music. (Mostly Techno, electro-House, EBM, and Trance.) And i'd be glad to help out with the project from time to time :-). Should I add my name to the list of participants?

And also, the article Electrobel deals with a website vastly about Electronic music. It's a fairly significant electronic online music community. But the article has received very little attention. I gave it a bit more of a formal tone etc. and was wondering if a more experienced editor could go over to the article and fix it up a little bit more. Thanks, (also, if this article is in the scope of wikiproject electronic music tell me and i'll add the notification). Nateland 21:30, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

  • I touched the article up a bit, it still needs some secondary sources though. I fully suggest you add your name to the list of members if you plan on doing work on electronic music articles. I hope you find this project useful! Wickethewok 06:34, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Categorizing compilation albums

I'm planning to categorize the various electronic music compilations, as part of subcategorizing Category:Compilation albums. Trying to brainstorm what categories might be needed.

  • Top-level: "Electronic music compilation albums"? Techno/ambient/IDM/experimental stuff that doesn't fit elsewhere, like the Warp Records albums and that one a bit up the page.
    • All "dance" compilations: "Electronic dance music compilation albums"? Too long? Can probably cover both "pop" and "club" material for the time being.
    • "Chillout" compilations: This is not strictly all electronic, so I'm not sure if this necessarily belongs here. Would it also encompass lounge/nu-jazz/cafe albums?

Anything else? –Unint 04:05, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

I would group them by closest big enough "parent" genre. Starting from Category:Electronic music compilation albums and making child categories when it becomes too large sounds the right solution. Monni 04:53, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
Created. Feel free to populate as needed. –Unint 18:07, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

FAO photographers!

  • If any of our members are avid concert goers (or have friends that are!), note that photographs for electronic music articles are ALWAYS needed. Put these photos up on Wikimedia Commons and then throw 'em in the relevant articles. Even if you don't have time to integrate them into the articles, upload them and list them here or something. Even if you aren't a concert goer/photographer, there's still ways to get photos. I've found that contacting artists and/or their booking agents is a good way to get a licensed a photo or two under the Creative Commons license. Such photos are usually promotional anyway, so it seems like they really shouldn't mind free-licensing them to allow for even more distribution of them, right? Flickr.com also has a great search feature for finding free photos, too. Even photographers who have "Copyright - All rights reserved" for their photos on Flickr will often agree to license them under Creative Commons if you just ask nicely and say that it would be really helpful for Wikipedia (remember to say that under Creative Commons, they still be credited for their work!). Millions (billions?) of people use Wikipedia and are perfectly willing to give something back in the form of a donation of a photo or two. Anyways, there are articles such as Orbital (band) and house music that don't even have a single photo yet, so even if you're not a great article writer, a camera or just talking to some folks can score you some good material for articles. Wickethewok 06:36, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Awesome, Zeibura! Thats actually a pretty useful idea, as I've just sorta been clicking through articles to find articles needing pictures. Also, if anyone else has any advice on obtaining photos of artists, equipment, or other stuff, please share.  :-) Wickethewok 16:36, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Electronic albums by sub-genre

We have yet another oversized electronica stub type on our hands; I've made one concrete proposal for a new sub-cat here, as well floating some more general possibilities. Please comment there. Alai 05:23, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Ah, I like the idea. Could you clarify each new stub type you propose to split the category into? You named "Techno, Indietronica, House, Trip hop, Trance and Ambient", if I interpret that correctly, it might be an idea to have one for drum & bass as well. - Zeibura (Talk) 10:12, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
I deliberately left it as open-ended as possible: could be all of those, some, or none. (Doing them one at a time is possibly the best way to deal with the overlap, though equally probably biases the process, too.) I didn't mention because it didn't show up on my initial number-crunching efforts: looking again, I only see 11 in that category tree. (This is all relying on the Category:Albums by genre subcats, which in turn depend on albums being categorised by artist, and the artists being meaningfully categorised by genre, so it's likely to have lots of gaps.) Alai 06:31, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Resident Advisor question

Does anyone know if RA's artist biographies (eg this one) are actually written by them, or are they just pulled from promotional materials or something? None of them are signed. I'm just wondering whether I can use them as a reliable source basically.--P4k 18:28, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

I think they're actually written by them. The "about" pages mention an editorial team, if that means anything. - Zeibura (Talk) 20:09, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
Thanks.--P4k 04:48, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

New article (2)

Being Boiled is now an article. Totnesmartin 17:40, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

TfD of {{Electronic dance music-footer}}

For those who don't watch this template, I've nominated it for deletion as redundant to the rest of the footers. Participate here if you have any opinions on this. Cheers, - Zeibura (Talk) 05:43, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Article request

Arc Lab

  • Do you have any articles written about this group? That is, one's written by reliable sources independent of the group? A Myspace page alone isn't enough to write an article with. Wickethewok 19:14, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Request for Comment: Merging/redirecting Electronic music & Electronica articles (closed)

Just to let you know there's a discussion going on on Talk:Electronica regarding whether electronica is even a sub-genre or not, and also how to organise the articles on electronic art music and electronic popular music. - Zeibura (Talk) 17:55, 17 August 2007 (UTC)


update

The discussion about redirecting or merging Electronica to Electronic music is taking place at this link: on the Electronica talk page. After the above was written, the editor did move the page, but instead of to Electronic music, he redirected and merged it to Electronic music (dance & popular) without consensus. The change was reverted by several editors and the discussion is continuing. If the page has been moved again by the time you read this, the above discussion link might not work. If so, please follow the redirect and find the discussion on the talk page. --Parsifal Hello 06:20, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

The Electronica discussion has been closed with clear consensus to keep the separate article title Electronica.

The discussion about overall organization of Electronic music subgenres is continuing Talk:Electronic art music. --Parsifal Hello 19:52, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

Comments request: Electronic dance music page move to Electronic music (popular & dance) (closed)

An editor redirected Electronic dance music to a new title Electronic music (popular & dance) without consensus, along with major changes to the content causing loss of information, and with duplication of information from Electronica. The changes were reverted but there was much confusion, so I don't know which page it will be on at the time someone is reading this. If the link below doesn't work, then it's been moved again, so if that happens, just follow the redirect and look for the discussion section on the talk page. If the change is made then there would no longer be a page about Electronic dance music. Comments are invited at this talk page link. --Parsifal Hello 09:24, 19 August 2007 (UTC)


The above RFC discussion has been closed with consensus to keep the original page name of Electronic dance music. --Parsifal Hello 19:24, 25 August 200

Couple of AfD's

section promoted to bottom for new notification These AfD debates may be of interest to you electronic music folk:

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Side chain (music) (outcome Redirect→Dynamic range compression#Side-chaining)
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Side chain (sound) (outcome Redirect→Dynamic range compression#Side-chaining)

Cheers, - Zeibura S. Kathau (Info | Talk) 01:20, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

17 August AFD: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cosmic (Italian dance music scene) --User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 16:47, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the notification - will check it out. --Parsifal Hello 21:21, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
The first ten Fabric albums have also been prod'd recently.--P4k 21:07, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Since we've now separated electronic classical from electronic dance music, I've drafted a rough idea for an upgrade to {{electronic dance music-footer}} here, bearing in mind the outcome of the TfD. Opinions would be welcome. - Zeibura (Talk) 15:23, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Also {{Electronica-footer}} needs sorting out one way or another, since both rows display the same links at present. They could be merged into the same template perhaps, what is it we've decided electronica means officially, just trance, house, techno and chillout? - Zeibura (Talk) 18:47, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject award

I've made us a WikiProject award, just so you're all aware, which is currently at User:Zeibura/Electronic Music Barnstar. Feel free to add a link on the project page or make any improvements if you wish. - Zeibura (Talk) 00:54, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

WP:PROD nominations

image deletion

There are quite a few images relating to Tiësto that have been tagged for deletion; see towards the end of User talk:Alexander Vince. John Vandenberg 12:34, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Marcus Intalex

This was speedily deleted. I don't have the time/desire to look for sources right now, but if anyone else wants to, it's in my userspace: User:P4k/Marcus Intalex.P4k 01:51, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

  • I found some sources for this and added them to the article, but haven't added any of the info to it into the prose. If anyone cares to they can go ahead and do that, as I might not get to it immediately. Wickethewok 06:20, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

General stuff, dubstep

The dubstep article has been getting fixed up nicely and is almost GA class. If I get a chance soon, I'll try to help tidy up some of the remaining issues myself. Remember, if anyone wants feedback about any particular article or anything like that, don't be shy about posting a message about it here! Thats what the project is for! I figure the list on the main project page is sort of a general list of ongoing projects of members, but any specific stuff (putting something on peer review, need help finding sources for an article, need help copyediting, etc) should still be mentioned here to let interested editors know. Wickethewok 06:20, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

Suburbass

I have proposed Suburbass for deletion because the article doesn't give any reasons why the artist is notable. If the article should be kept (you've heard of him, and he's been especially successful or influential), feel free to remove the tag. It could really use some context in the form of independent news reports, reviews, etc. and information about which album releases are most important. Otherwise, just leave the proposed deletion tag in place for five days, and you can add any comments to Talk:Suburbass. Thanks. --Reuben (talk) 17:14, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

  • I agree with the PROD, searching for +suburbass +review on google doesn't give me back anything useful, so I'm inclined to believe there isn't much if any reliable information about him out there. The article has been around for over 2 years and has been barely touched (it isn't even wikilinked to). Wickethewok (talk) 21:31, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for checking on it. Nobody opposed, so it's now deleted. --Reuben (talk) 14:34, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

AfD: Techmospheric

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Techmospheric - Zeibura (Talk) 00:36, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sensomusic Usine

This is an AFD for an article about a electronic music sequencer type thing. I haven't really heard of it or read anything about it, but maybe someone here has. Wickethewok (talk) 10:20, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

The KLF discography (2)

The KLF discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) is up for it's second Featured List Candidacy. If you would like to review the nomination please see Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/The KLF discography. --kingboyk (talk) 20:36, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

bassline

If anyone here has any pictures to add to the bassline house article, this would be much appreciated, since I'm thinking this isn't too far off GA level now, but the highly annoying factor of needing to have pics gets in the way here, as it does with most music genres =/ - Zeibura (Talk) 01:52, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Maybe you already know this, but images aren't actually a requirement for GA.[1] P4k (talk) 12:24, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Hmm, I did not know that, thanks. I was kind of going by stuff I've seen (e.g. this and this. Guess things have changed a bit. - Zeibura ( talk ) 10:50, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

UK garage cat

Just to spread the word I've made a Category:UK garage, which now needs populating, and I can tell there's going to be quite a lot out there, so if anyone comes across anything that should be in there please add it. Cheers, - Zeibura ( talk ) 10:47, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Who is responsible for rating articles?

You're not doing a very good job. Talk:Neurofunk#This_article_is_full_of_POV.2C_misinformative_and_all_work_by_other_users_is_rejected_by_the_main_writer - but it's B-class - quite simply inexplicable —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.108.167.227 (talk) 12:59, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

  • Anyone can rate articles. You don't even need to be a member of a WikiProject to do so. This one in particular appears to have been rated by a member who seems to have left Wikipedia. Really, time spent rating articles would be better spent doing almost anything else. Wickethewok (talk) 21:00, 20 May 2008 (UTC)


Looking for some help

I have proposed that some articles be merged here. There seems to be alot of minor non-notable sub sub genres with articles. I was wondering if anyone had any opinions as to how to deal with this or any ideas how to must present these? Should we merged them all to Breakbeat? Do articles like Breakbeat hardcore go to Breakbeat or Hardcore techno? --neon white talk 16:40, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Graham Massey

Guys someone really needs to do some more work with the Graham Massey page, anyone who know anything about electronica should know who he is. I added a bunch of stuff but im really busy with other things. Would be great if somone could do something. Ta! :) ΤΕΡΡΑΣΙΔΙΩΣ(Ταλκ) 17:34, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Changes to the WP:1.0 assessment scheme

As you may have heard, we at the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial Team recently made some changes to the assessment scale, including the addition of a new level. The new description is available at WP:ASSESS.

  • The new C-Class represents articles that are beyond the basic Start-Class, but which need additional references or cleanup to meet the standards for B-Class.
  • The criteria for B-Class have been tightened up with the addition of a rubric, and are now more in line with the stricter standards already used at some projects.
  • A-Class article reviews will now need more than one person, as described here.

Each WikiProject should already have a new C-Class category at Category:C-Class_articles. If your project elects not to use the new level, you can simply delete your WikiProject's C-Class category and clarify any amendments on your project's assessment/discussion pages. The bot is already finding and listing C-Class articles.

Please leave a message with us if you have any queries regarding the introduction of the revised scheme. This scheme should allow the team to start producing offline selections for your project and the wider community within the next year. Thanks for using the Wikipedia 1.0 scheme! For the 1.0 Editorial Team, §hepBot (Disable) 21:58, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Articles flagged for cleanup

Currently, 1243 articles are assigned to this project, of which 285, or 22.9%, are flagged for cleanup of some sort. (Data as of 14 July 2008.) Are you interested in finding out more? I am offering to generate cleanup to-do lists on a project or work group level. See User:B. Wolterding/Cleanup listings for details. More than 150 projects and work groups have already subscribed, and adding a subscription for yours is easy - just place a template on your project page.

If you want to respond to this canned message, please do so at my user talk page; I'm not watching this page. --B. Wolterding (talk) 16:35, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of compilation series

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Back to Mine: Adam Freeland

Basically, the state of the entire series of Back to Mine, DJ-Kicks, and Late Night Tales is such that if these articles were deleted, all those would be as well. The discussion here may not set any precedent but if these articles are deleted, those will probably be next. Feel free to express your opinion. - McCart42 (talk) 14:44, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia 0.7 articles have been selected for Electronic music

Wikipedia 0.7 is a collection of English Wikipedia articles due to be released on DVD, and available for free download, later this year. The Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team has made an automated selection of articles for Version 0.7.

We would like to ask you to review the articles selected from this project. These were chosen from the articles with this project's talk page tag, based on the rated importance and quality. If there are any specific articles that should be removed, please let us know at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.7. You can also nominate additional articles for release, following the procedure at Wikipedia:Release Version Nominations.

A list of selected articles with cleanup tags, sorted by project, is available. The list is automatically updated each hour when it is loaded. Please try to fix any urgent problems in the selected articles. A team of copyeditors has agreed to help with copyediting requests, although you should try to fix simple issues on your own if possible.

We would also appreciate your help in identifying the version of each article that you think we should use, to help avoid vandalism or POV issues. These versions can be recorded at this project's subpage of User:SelectionBot/0.7. We are planning to release the selection for the holiday season, so we ask you to select the revisions before October 20. At that time, we will use an automatic process to identify which version of each article to release, if no version has been manually selected. Thanks! For the Wikipedia 1.0 Editorial team, SelectionBot 23:20, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Sharp & Smooth at AfD

This house-related pruduction duo is in need of sourcing but editors are unsure what house music sources might be. Input welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharp & Smooth. -- Banjeboi 04:35, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Funky House article

Hello, I quickly rewrote the article on funky house as it was incorrect, and sourced it appropriately. Maybe someone with more time could expand it? Also there is another editor (Desbest) that keeps adding nonsense to the article, check the history and you'll get an idea!

Cheers --JV —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.142.53.108 (talk) 06:25, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

New Member

I'm a new member of this WikiProject. I know this is inappropriate, but this is bothering me and I want other people's opinions. Why do you think some folks think techno was created in Europe. There are countless amounts of data and resources that proves techno was created in Detroit, Michigan, USA by the Belleville Three - Juan Atkins, Derrick May and Kevin Saunderson. They have admitted many times how Kraftwerk has been an influence on them. Derrick May describes it as "George Clinton and Kraftwerk being stuck on an elevator with a keyboard between them." However, Kraftwerk didn't create techno and they never called their music techno. They called their music Krautrock and electro. So why do you think some people are ignorant. Is it racism? Can some folks not wrap their mind around the idea of techno being created by people of African descent? Fclass (talk) 23:52, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

In my experience, unless you are an electronic music nerd (i.e. someone like us who is working on this project and articles), the word "techno" means "electronic music." The subtleties are too hard to discern where the average person would know the difference from techno, electro, rave, or jungle, even though they are plainly obvious to us. It's all the same to them. I'm guilty of that myself. I rarely meet anyone who listens to electronic music so if I'm asked what music I like, I just say techno, even though I don't listen to or like that genre. It's less of a mouthful to say than electronic music or electronica, and the average person knows what I mean. For the European connection, I would say that's because the majority of electronic music is still not mainstream in the US. For example, you'll never hear it on the radio unless it's the most boring, generic "pump up the jam" garbage. You might be lucky enough to find some college radio stations playing more adventurous electronic music. --Mperry (talk) 05:58, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Dispute regarding Stockhausen on the Aphex Twin page

I'd appreciate it if a few editors offered an opinion on this silly dispute regarding the inclusion of Stockhausen as an influence on Richard D. James. e.g. [2] --Kaini (talk) 22:36, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Genres in infoboxes

There's currently an important discussion going on about the removal of genre fields in band and album infoboxes. You can read the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music#Time to remove genre section on info box? and provide any opinions you may have. WesleyDodds (talk) 07:30, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

  • As an editor, I am inclined to agree with the removal. However, as a reader, I like being able to glance at an infobox and see roughly what kind of music an artist does. When in doubt, I think I need to fall on the side of readers, as that is ultimately who Wikipedia is for. (will cross-post) Wickethewok (talk) 14:23, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Edit wars at dubstep, 2-step garage, and Bassline house

User:Yaneleksklus aka 86.57.*.* aka 93.85.*.* sure is making life miserable for the maintainers of these articles at present. he doesn't seem to understand WP:RS and his english isn't great. and he doesn't respond to messages left on his talk page. how does one go about tackling an editor like this? --Kaini (talk) 21:22, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

in fact, it looks like he's causing hassle at about a zillion different pages on musical genres. his intentions do seem good, he just has no intention of discussing the changes he is making with anyone, let alone forming a consensus. --Kaini (talk) 21:57, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Notability of John Dahlbäck

I created the article on DJ/producer John Dahlbäck today and the notability of the subject is being questioned (the article has been deleted once today already). Granted, the article is by no means a finished GA, but I think, without being an expert, that the article at least could be an acceptable stub given his notability. Mr Dahlbäck was featured on Pete Tong's Essential Mix on October 4th, and judging by his discography I would guess he is notable enough for an article, but what do I know? Could someone from this project just make a neutral comment on the notability of Mr Dahlbäck on his article's talkpage since I'm not 100 percent certain on the notability guidelines of musicians. Thankfully, Sebisthlm (talk) 03:39, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

EDIT: The article has been nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Dahlbäck. Sebisthlm (talk) 04:28, 24 October 2008 (UTC)

AfD: "Wonky"

Feel free to express your opinion here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wonky (music) - filelakeshoe 12:03, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Gas (Wolfgang Voigt)

hello all, i've started on documenting the Wolfgang Voigt project Gas (created 4 album articles tonight), and contributions from other editors interested in the musician would be very welcome. check the links for info! --Kaini (talk) 23:54, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

added the gorgeous (well the latter three albums, anyway) cover art. i must dig out the recent interview with voigt in the wire, there's a wealth of infos in there. --Kaini (talk) 22:31, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
big jobs! - Template:Gas_discography [3] --Kaini (talk) 01:50, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

red bull music academy lectures

i've removed these links from wiki about a million times on various articles, dismissing them as spam without giving them a proper look - [4]. this seems to be common practice... mainly because they were added by what was clearly single-purpose red bull PR accounts. but this is good, nay excellent primary-source stuff, some of them have transcripts and all. very wikifriendly - actually using the voigt one as a reference now. oh, the hypocrisy. in summation: awesome resource. --Kaini (talk) 02:18, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Question on 2 sites for sourcing

I am wanting to know if either this site or this site would be considered a reliable source?じんない 00:15, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

  • As for http://eurokdj.free.fr/ , I would say almost certainly not - as I've never seen a reliable website that was using free webspace from their internet provider and their doesn't seem to be any sort of editorial/verifying structure on the website. As for Bubblegumdancer.com, the only editorial oversight seems to be an 18 year old New Zealander named Mitch, so I'm going to say that this site isn't particularly reliable either. Other editors are welcome to weigh-in of course. Wickethewok (talk) 01:34, 15 December 2008 (UTC)

Help

An article called ultritalo is a user's introduction page or something. I know it doesn't meet the standards. It should be deleted, but I forgot how to do the deletion process. Pandyu (talk) 17:16, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Started WikiProject

The current categorization of Electronic music is rather messy (see Category:Electronic music). I started to do some cleaning up, but soon realised that it was going to be more work than I had initially anticipated and that some planning and organization was needed. That's the main reason for setting up this WikiProject. There's also an awful lot of articles in need of attention as well as other tasks that could benefit from coordination. Please add tasks here if you've got any ideas. Hagbard Celine 18:11, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

Milestone Announcements

Announcements
  • All WikiProjects are invited to have their "milestone-reached" announcements automatically placed onto Wikipedia's announcements page.
  • Milestones could include the number of FAs, GAs or articles covered by the project.
  • No work need be done by the project themselves; they just need to provide some details when they sign up. A bot will do all of the hard work.
Click here for more information or to sign your project up.

I thought this WikiProject might be interested. Ping me with any specific queries or leave them on the page linked to above. Thanks! - Jarry1250 (t, c) 21:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Coordinators' working group

Hi! I'd like to draw your attention to the new WikiProject coordinators' working group, an effort to bring both official and unofficial WikiProject coordinators together so that the projects can more easily develop consensus and collaborate. This group has been created after discussion regarding possible changes to the A-Class review system, and that may be one of the first things discussed by interested coordinators.

All designated project coordinators are invited to join this working group. If your project hasn't formally designated any editors as coordinators, but you are someone who regularly deals with coordination tasks in the project, please feel free to join as well. — Delievered by §hepBot (Disable) on behalf of the WikiProject coordinators' working group at 05:20, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Peer review of Bale Out

The article Bale Out is currently at peer review, comments appreciated at the subpage, Wikipedia:Peer review/Bale Out/archive1. Cirt (talk) 08:43, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Ray of Light GA Sweeps: On Hold

I have reviewed Ray of Light for GA Sweeps to determine if it still qualifies as a Good Article. In reviewing the article I have found several issues, which I have detailed here. Since the article falls under the scope of this project, I figured you would be interested in contributing to further improve the article. Please comment there to help the article maintain its GA status. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 18:32, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

GA reassessment of Drum and bass

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found a large number of concerns which you can see at Talk:Drum and bass/GA1, and consequently have de-listed the article. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:07, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Remix categories nominated for deletion

Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2009_July_22#Remixes. __meco (talk) 14:34, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Scale?

We need a Quality Scale, since the main WP:WikiProject Music does not a Quality Scale & it is up the sub music projects to come up with a Quality Scale. 『 ɠu¹ɖяy 』¤ 19:03, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Electronica

[5]. I completely lost interest in this sockpuppetry-filled round-in-circles shouting match a long time ago but incase anyone hasn't yet, someone's just gone and redirected Electronica to Electronic dance music and deleted a load of sourced material in the process. - filelakeshoe 15:41, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

How To Join

Do I simply add my name to the list on the article then add the userbox to my page? Keytar Shredder (talk) 12:19, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Trance music vs Goa trance/Psy trance

I'd like to start a discussion on whether those two categories should be treaten like separate genres of music or the same genre. A bunch of sources on the history of both genres(subgenres) can be found. Trance music is described as the type of music that derived from techno in Germany in the early 1990s, while Goa is described as a type of music discovered by hippies listening to EBM in the late 1980s. While Trance is associated with huge stadiums, internation electronic music festivals, Goa is associated with a wide range of types of events - from open air festivals to night forest discoteques. Trance DJs tend not to include Goa into their sets, Goa DJs tend not to include Trance into their sets. But still, in my opinion, Goa and Trance are simillar sonically, and some of their subgenres ("subsubgenres") are not distinguishable (eg, psy prog/full on and progressive trance). I would like a consensus on this topic to be formed; without a definite position on the topic, various problems can't be solved - for example - can one include the history of goa trance into trance music article? is separate footbox for goa/psytrance needed? is it right or wrong to describe the subgenres of psytrance in the trance music article? etc. The best solution would be one reliable source, that states these two are separate genres/the same genre. -- Appletangerine un (talk) 15:16, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

To continue discussion, I was quite lucky to find this book on Google.Books: Encyclopaedia of India, Pakistan and Bangladesh. It has an article on goa/psy where it specifically underlines that goa trance is not a form of trance music that originated in Europe. This source seems quite a reliable one, but still the majority of sources do not I've checked through do not differ Trance and Goa. So I am waiting for your replies on the discussion. -- Appletangerine un (talk) 15:36, 2 November 2009 (UTC)


Electro house

Could somebody with knowledge have a look at Electro house and request deletition? --Subfader (talk) 00:39, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

While article definitely needs to be improved, deleting it is not the case at all, considering the huge popularity of this type of music at the moment. I am sure many articles on it can be found, at least because some electro house had recently reached mainstream charts (eg, The Crookers' remix of "Day'n Nite").
But if you suggest to delete it and then to rewrite it on the ground of reliable sources (not those sources listed in the article), then I vote yes, the existing article is of awful quality. -- 217.21.43.222 (talk) 09:39, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Good Article Reassessment for Justified and Ancient

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns with the article which you can see at Talk:Justified and Ancient/GA1. I have placed the article on hold for one week to allow for these issues to be fixed. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan (talk) 17:25, 7 November 2009 (UTC)

Good Article Reassessment of Shag Times

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns with the article which you can see at Talk:Shag Times/GA1. I have placed the article on hold for one week to allow for these issues to be fixed. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan (talk) 20:28, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

GA reassessment of Alec Empire

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:Alec Empire/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:05, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Lack of Dubstep pages

I have noticed the lack of dubstep pages, I tried to make a few but they all get deleted without any explanation. Croydongrimeking (talk) 17:02, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Removal of reviews from the album infobox

This is a notification of the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums regarding the removal of reviews from the album infobox. The discussion has reached consensus to remove the reviews, though is still accepting further input into the matter. We are especially requiring more discussion on what steps to take next. Your input would be appreciated on what is a matter that will affect a lot of music articles. kiac. (talk-contrib) 09:32, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Portal

Portal up grade has been done--->>> Portal:Electronic music...Buzzzsherman (talk) 01:24, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

WP 1.0 bot announcement

This message is being sent to each WikiProject that participates in the WP 1.0 assessment system. On Saturday, January 23, 2010, the WP 1.0 bot will be upgraded. Your project does not need to take any action, but the appearance of your project's summary table will change. The upgrade will make many new, optional features available to all WikiProjects. Additional information is available at the WP 1.0 project homepage. — Carl (CBM · talk) 03:15, 22 January 2010 (UTC)


Request for comment on Biographies of living people

Hello Wikiproject! Currently there is a discussion which will decide whether wikipedia will delete 49,000 articles about a living person without references, here:

Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people

Since biographies of living people covers so many topics, many wikiproject topics will be effected.

The two opposing positions which have the most support is:

  1. supports the deletion of unreferenced articles about a living person, User:Jehochman
  2. opposes the deletion of unreferenced articles about a living person, except in limited circumstances, User:Collect

Comments are welcome. Keep in mind that by default, editor's comments are hidden. Simply press edit next to the section to add your comment.

Please keep in mind that at this point, it seems that editors support deleting unreferenced BLP articles if they are not sourced, so your project may want to source these articles as soon as possible. See the next, message, which may help.

Tools to help your project with unreferenced Biographies of living people

List of cleanup articles for your project

If you don't already have this and are interested in creating a list of articles which need cleanup for your wikiproject see: Cleanup listings A list of examples is here

Moving unreferenced blp articles to a special "incubation pages

If you are interested in moving unreferenced blp articles that your project covers, to a special "incubation page", contact me, User talk:Ikip

Watchlisting all unreferenced articles

If you are interested in watchlisting all of the unreferenced articles once you install Cleanup_listings, contact me, User talk:Ikip

Ikip 05:06, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

GA reassessment of Homework (album)

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:Homework (album)/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:46, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion

Please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dream house. __meco (talk) 21:26, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Other electronic genre articles under discussion:

The expertise of knowledgeable editors would be appreciated. — Gwalla | Talk 18:58, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

GA reassessment of Tiësto

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as it has been tagged for some time with a number of issues. You are being notified as this project's banner is on the talk page. I have delisted it because of serious concerns which you can see at Talk:Tiësto/GA3. If you disagree with this reassessment please bring it to WP:GAR, otherwise if the outstanding issues are addressed please renominate at WP:GAN. Thanks. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 00:55, 21 March 2010 (UTC) All comments welcome. Ridernyc (talk) 12:49, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Help requested

There is currently a discussion regarding whether the synthpop genre should apply to Pretty Hate Machine, and confusion regarding the application of genres generally. Outside opinions and help from editors with experience in such things is greatly appreciated. Thanks! //Blaxthos ( t / c ) 00:18, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Mainstream Popularity.

Someone keeps saying this genre is mainly popular in the UK. It is not. All the electropop artists come from the UNITED STATES, for example Lady Gaga and Ke$ha. Please fix this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Teachereaseply944 (talk • contribs) 01:54, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Lady Gaga: Queen of Pop

AfD for this article, discussion is at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lady Gaga: Queen of Pop (2nd nomination). Thank you for your time. Cheers, -- Cirt (talk) 04:07, 5 June 2010 (UTC)

Category:Electronic music compilation albums CFD

Hello, this is a notice for this WikiProject in regards to a current category for discussion. Category:Electronic music compilation albums is currently nominated to be merged into Category:Electronic compilation albums. Your comments are welcome, and the discussion can be found here. Thank you. — ξxplicit 07:04, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Nadia Ali Articles

I have created articles for the singer-songwriter Nadia Ali. Could anyone please review the articles Nadia Ali Discography, Embers, Queen of Clubs Trilogy: Ruby Edition, Crash and Burn, Love Story, Fine Print and Fantasy and suggest any improvements I could make to them. Thanks! Hassan514 (talk) 03:00, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Electronic music articles have been selected for the Wikipedia 0.8 release

Version 0.8 is a collection of Wikipedia articles selected by the Wikipedia 1.0 team for offline release on USB key, DVD and mobile phone. Articles were selected based on their assessed importance and quality, then article versions (revisionIDs) were chosen for trustworthiness (freedom from vandalism) using an adaptation of the WikiTrust algorithm.

We would like to ask you to review the Electronic music articles and revisionIDs we have chosen. Selected articles are marked with a diamond symbol (♦) to the right of each article, and this symbol links to the selected version of each article. If you believe we have included or excluded articles inappropriately, please contact us at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8 with the details. You may wish to look at your WikiProject's articles with cleanup tags and try to improve any that need work; if you do, please give us the new revisionID at Wikipedia talk:Version 0.8. We would like to complete this consultation period by midnight UTC on Monday, October 11th.

We have greatly streamlined the process since the Version 0.7 release, so we aim to have the collection ready for distribution by the end of October, 2010. As a result, we are planning to distribute the collection much more widely, while continuing to work with groups such as One Laptop per Child and Wikipedia for Schools to extend the reach of Wikipedia worldwide. Please help us, with your WikiProject's feedback!

For the Wikipedia 1.0 editorial team, SelectionBot 22:24, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

South African psytrance nominated for deletion

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South African psytrance. __meco (talk) 17:44, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kohoutek-Kometenmelodie

The article Kohoutek-Kometenmelodie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Single songs generally do not meet the requirements of WP:N, no mention of notability no references

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeepday (talk) 16:30, 5 December 2010 (UTC)

No idea if anyone is still watching this page, but input needed

Input from members of this project is requested regarding the Trance music article, here. Thanks. → ROUX ₪ 18:50, 24 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Intelligent drum and bass

The article Intelligent drum and bass has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a notable genre, lacks reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Λeternus (talk) 19:47, 14 July 2011 (UTC)

Input needed please

Hi all, I have been rewriting the Tech trance article. Suggestions and input are greatly appreciated! Vachnic (talk) 14:26, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Article at AfD

Renard Queenston needs some specialist eyes from you guys, please. Is he notable? --Dweller (talk) 09:38, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

Pageview stats

After a recent request, I added WikiProject Electronic music to the list of projects to compile monthly pageview stats for. The data is the same used by http://stats.grok.se/en/ but the program is different, and includes the aggregate views from all redirects to each page. The stats are at Wikipedia:WikiProject Electronic music/Popular pages.

The page will be updated monthly with new data. The edits aren't marked as bot edits, so they will show up in watchlists. You can view more results, request a new project be added to the list, or request a configuration change for this project using the toolserver tool. If you have any comments or suggestions, please let me know. Thanks! Mr.Z-man 21:54, 2 October 2011 (UTC)


I saw the french wikipedia site referenced as a source for an article- is there anyone with enough knowledge of French to translate the articles on that site with the goal of expanding the ones here? Mkantonelli1 (talk) 08:12, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Project Status

I went ahead and swapped out the "inactive" for "semi-active" status on the project page. Mkantonelli1 (talk) 04:51, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

I regularly add articles to the project and update assessments. I don't know if others do similar or other chores to further the goals of the project. __meco (talk) 09:29, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
I have been updating assessments and adding to articles where I can. Hopefully the amount of unassessed and stub articles can be dramatically reduced. Mkantonelli1 (talk) 10:01, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Reviewing Homework.

Hi. I'm the current reviewer of Homework (Daft Punk album), which has been nominated to Good article. I need people interested in the topic to help me improve the article. Improvements are mandatory for the aticle to meet the Good article criteria, since its current form does not meet those guidelines.

I'll really appreciate your help. Thanks. --Hahc21 (talk) 02:47, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

FAR notification

I have nominated 4 Minutes (Madonna song) for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Dana boomer (talk) 21:47, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

New welcoming template

I have created {{subst:Welcome-EDMC}}. This is a welcoming template which can be added to the talk pages of new Wikipedia users that appear to have a particular interest in topics covered by this project. __meco (talk) 08:03, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

MIDI

Hi, all. Are there any active members here with an interest in or knowledge of MIDI? I'd like to improve coverage of MIDI articles, and ideally form a WikiProject MIDI that would take the topic under wing. MIDI is currently claimed by the Computing and Video Games projects, and I don't expect that either of those groups are going to give the proper attention to the musical aspects that MIDI was designed for. It's a large and important subject, and the existing articles aren't particularly good. Anybody who has the inclination or ability to help, please let me know. Let's get our synth on! Dementia13 (talk) 01:21, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

One of the things I wish I understood more about electronic music production is MIDI! Sorry! Hopefully somebody will be able to help you. Lighthead...KILLS!! 07:17, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

I added the WPEM banner. Leave the technical aspects of MIDI to the Computing editors, however we could easily find some material to add about how the advent of MIDI influenced music, specifically the progression from disco and synthpop to loop based house and techno. And obviously about video game music too. - filelakeshoe 08:57, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks, all, for the response. Keyboardists and recording professionals/enthusiasts would probably be the prime candidates, because they would be familiar with MIDI from both a musical and technical standpoint. The main MIDI page is already tagged by the Computer science project, but there are many aspects of MIDI, many with pages of their own, that have little or nothing to do with computers. If the CS guys had any interest in improving those, there'd be no need to ask about this in the first place. I'm thinking of something with a broad scope, that would cover MIDI instruments and related devices, software, history, technologies, and artists. Dementia13 (talk) 13:17, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

This template needs to be completely revised. For one, the title says hardcore techno, but then the template itself goes on to list genres like ambient, drum and bass, dubstep, and even trance. Only a few of the genres listed are actual sub-genres of hardcore techno. I would say that you could name it hard dance music, or even try to group it under EDM, but after seeing the wide array of genres there, that won't work either. I was thinking about making a hardcore techno template, then going back through and reclassifying the others into their proper areas of production. (i.e., a house template would include genres like u.k. garage etc...)


Any thoughts? The Undead Never Die (talk) 14:26, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

There is a section of the template which is called "Other electronic music genres", which implies that these genres are not offshoots of hardcore dance or EDM or whatever it is called. There should not be a need for an area displaying "other electronic music genres", if they are not affiliated with hardcore dance/techno. Therefore, the first thing to do for the template is to get rid of that section.
Another question you proposed is what the genres should be grouped under, if not all of them are fittingly grouped under "hardcore dance music". A suggestion to navigate this issue is for this information to be merged with Template:Electronic dance music-footer, while that template has sub-sections, potentially according to List of electronic music genres. Or, the genres of electronic music could have their own templates listing the subgenres, or there could be one large electronic music template with subsections. Backtable Speak to meconcerning my deeds. 22:01, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

something wrong with Kling Klang Studio

quote from this article:

but, since when? if it's 1976 or 1973(the previous edit shows), then a logical error appears: from following content we can find that they spent 8~10h a day designing a mobile studio for 3 years, and it was designed for Computer World tour- but Computer World is released in 1981, how can they designed a mobile studio for a tour about the album which they hadn't even released? - Dr. Cravix ♪Eternal Reminiscence 06:01, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Importance and quality scales

The {{WPEM}} talk page template links to sections for this project's assessment scales, but the links are dead. Did they ever exist? Are assessment rankings hiding somewhere? czar · · 01:22, 19 October 2012 (UTC)

the importance ratings of this project seems to be entirely skewed and should be looked over, e.g. all articles regarding future sound of london have been placed under top importance. tetraedycal 20:04, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

guidelines regarding cat# in discography section

which label a record was released by are highly important in some dance music scenes, is there some guideline on wether/how this should be included in disocgraphy sections? tetraedycal 20:01, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Vital articles

There is a discussion regarding which music articles should be deemed vital to the Wikipedia project occuring here. Your input would be appreciated. GabeMc (talk|contribs) 21:39, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

New TFA nomination

I've nominated the article 1987 (What the Fuck Is Going On?) for consideration as a candidate for WP:Today's Featured Article, please see Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests, — Cirt (talk) 20:51, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Re-classification

I noticed the article Trap (music genre) was listed as a stub on your quality scale and was simply curious if it still qualifies as a stub. I came across it on the Top 5000 Articles page and it seems to have grown (849 bytes in Oct 2012 when it was assessed to 8,068 bytes as of now). Coinmanj (talk) 17:28, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

It's over 1500 characters of prose, so a reclassification to Start class makes sense czar · · 17:41, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Electronic music colours

There is a debate on whether to split the different forms of electronic music infoboxes into different colours at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music/Music genres task force/Colours#Black for uptempo electronic music genres?. All views are welcome.--SabreBD (talk) 11:02, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

DJ Many

Soulja Boy's DJ requests assistance with an article about him, now a draft: Draft:DJ_Many_(Disc_Jockey) Ocaasi t | c 17:20, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

I don't see suitable independent, reliable sources for such an article right now czar ♔ 19:16, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

As of January, the popular pages tool has moved from the Toolserver to Wikimedia Tool Labs. The code has changed significantly from the Toolserver version, but users should notice few differences. Please take a moment to look over your project's list for any anomalies, such as pages that you expect to see that are missing or pages that seem to have more views than expected. Note that unlike other tools, this tool aggregates all views from redirects, which means it will typically have higher numbers. (For January 2014 specifically, 35 hours of data is missing from the WMF data, which was approximated from other dates. For most articles, this should yield a more accurate number. However, a few articles, like ones featured on the Main Page, may be off).

Web tools, to replace the ones at tools:~alexz/pop, will become available over the next few weeks at toollabs:popularpages. All of the historical data (back to July 2009 for some projects) has been copied over. The tool to view historical data is currently partially available (assessment data and a few projects may not be available at the moment). The tool to add new projects to the bot's list is also available now (editing the configuration of current projects coming soon). Unlike the previous tool, all changes will be effective immediately. OAuth is used to authenticate users, allowing only regular users to make changes to prevent abuse. A visible history of configuration additions and changes is coming soon. Once tools become fully available, their toolserver versions will redirect to Labs.

If you have any questions, want to report any bugs, or there are any features you would like to see that aren't currently available on the Toolserver tools, see the updated FAQ or contact me on my talk page. Mr.Z-bot (talk) (for Mr.Z-man) 05:04, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Leaflet For Wikiproject Electronic Music At Wikimania 2014

Hi all,

My name is Adi Khajuria and I am helping out with Wikimania 2014 in London.

One of our initiatives is to create leaflets to increase the discoverability of various wikimedia projects, and showcase the breadth of activity within wikimedia. Any kind of project can have a physical paper leaflet designed - for free - as a tool to help recruit new contributors. These leaflets will be printed at Wikimania 2014, and the designs can be re-used in the future at other events and locations.

This is particularly aimed at highlighting less discoverable but successful projects, e.g:

• Active Wikiprojects: Wikiproject Medicine, WikiProject Video Games, Wikiproject Film

• Tech projects/Tools, which may be looking for either users or developers.

• Less known major projects: Wikinews, Wikidata, Wikivoyage, etc.

• Wiki Loves Parliaments, Wiki Loves Monuments, Wiki Loves ____

• Wikimedia thematic organisations, Wikiwomen’s Collaborative, The Signpost

For more information or to sign up for one for your project, go to:
Project leaflets
Adikhajuria (talk) 15:37, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Templates for discussion

Gabber/Hardcore redirect confusion

Gabber redirects to early hardcore, but gabber (music) redirects to mainstream hardcore. Shouldn't these redirect to the same place? I'd do it myself but I'm not sure which target is more appropriate. Should those articles be merged (early hardcore is pretty short)? — Gwalla | Talk 20:26, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Done. The content issue is more that the article mainstream hardcore needs some cleanup. In my experience that's a bit of a catch-all label for anything "mainstream" at a certain time and the article is full of "recently…" so it's difficult to work out what sound it's talking about. The bit about "most gabber today is produced at 160–180bpm" definitely seems out of date. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 12:14, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
Thanks! I just set up Rotterdam techno as a redirect too, replacing the article that was just deleted (which was an unsourced stub talking mainly about a Japanese scene). — Gwalla | Talk 18:36, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
Please join the discussion at Talk:Mainstream hardcore#Merger proposal. Thanks! – filelakeshoe (t / c) 07:54, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Comment on the WikiProject X proposal

Hello there! As you may already know, most WikiProjects here on Wikipedia struggle to stay active after they've been founded. I believe there is a lot of potential for WikiProjects to facilitate collaboration across subject areas, so I have submitted a grant proposal with the Wikimedia Foundation for the "WikiProject X" project. WikiProject X will study what makes WikiProjects succeed in retaining editors and then design a prototype WikiProject system that will recruit contributors to WikiProjects and help them run effectively. Please review the proposal here and leave feedback. If you have any questions, you can ask on the proposal page or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you for your time! (Also, sorry about the posting mistake earlier. If someone already moved my message to the talk page, feel free to remove this posting.) Harej (talk) 22:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)

WP:VG comments subpages cleanup

Hi, there is currently a discussion taking place at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games#VG comments subpages regarding whether it would be acceptable to permanently shift all comments subpages associated with WP:VG articles into talk. This shift would follow the recommended approach given at WP:DCS. The WikiProject Electronic music articles that would be affected by this action are these:

If you have objections related specifically to WikiProject Electronic music's use of these subpages, please make this clear at the discussion so that other unrelated talk pages can be cleaned up where appropriate. Thank you. -Thibbs (talk) 15:55, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Expert attention

This is a notice about Category:Electronic music articles needing expert attention, which might be of interest to your WikiProject. It will take a while before the category is populated. Iceblock (talk) 04:27, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject X is live!

Hello everyone!

You may have received a message from me earlier asking you to comment on my WikiProject X proposal. The good news is that WikiProject X is now live! In our first phase, we are focusing on research. At this time, we are looking for people to share their experiences with WikiProjects: good, bad, or neutral. We are also looking for WikiProjects that may be interested in trying out new tools and layouts that will make participating easier and projects easier to maintain. If you or your WikiProject are interested, check us out! Note that this is an opt-in program; no WikiProject will be required to change anything against its wishes. Please let me know if you have any questions. Thank you!

Note: To receive additional notifications about WikiProject X on this talk page, please add this page to Wikipedia:WikiProject X/Newsletter. Otherwise, this will be the last notification sent about WikiProject X.

Harej (talk) 16:57, 14 January 2015 (UTC)

SAW II discussion

There is currently discussion about the list of trivia and prose on the article for Selected Ambient Works II. If anyone could add to the discussion here, it would be useful. Thank you! Andrzejbanas (talk) 04:57, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Spencer & Hill

Someone deleted (albeit a long time ago) the Spencer & Hill article despite the fact they are notable (per WP:MUSBIO, is anyone in favour of re-instating it? Abcmaxx (talk) 21:17, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Amber (performer) listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Amber (performer) to be moved to Amber (singer). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 22:32, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

2101 Records listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for 2101 Records to be moved to RedOne Records. This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 23:19, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Amber (singer) listed at Requested moves

A requested move discussion has been initiated for Amber (singer) to be moved to Amber (singer). This page is of interest to this WikiProject and interested members may want to participate in the discussion here. —RMCD bot 04:59, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Timeless by Goldie (vinyl limited edition)

To Whome It May Concern, 

                       I have been looking for a copy of Timeless by Goldie on vinyl that includes the tracks called INNER CITY LIFE, PRESSURE, and JAH. It is my belief that such a record exists and is worth hundreds if not thousands of pounds sterling (uk currency) to dj's and collectors like myself. On the matter of importance, I would give this album the highest rating as it is very unique and still vaguely contemporary in 2015 due to its relation to drum and bass and its timeless nature as could be implied by it's name. I am a musician and a dj and having an appreciation for every style of music I have ever encountered qualifies me to rate this album in the way I have just done. It is not only as good as any other drum and bass written ever, but it is also as good as any other MUSIC ever written too. Goldie is naturally musical and so are those who co-wrote this album. Please note there is a cd available with the three tracks I mentioned which feature as 1 track/ piece of music, this is usually either with a white and blue cover or an extremely multicoloured cover (the later is a newer edition sometimes listed as "Timeless II" which contains the tracks from the "full album" Timeless as released on cd in the blue and white sleeve PLUS more tracks such as "Jah the Seventh Seal" and "This is a Bad". To my knowledge the cd with the longer list of tracks (the extremely multicoloured one) which is sometimes sold or listed as Timeless II has never been reproduced on vinyl. If it ever is released on vinyl it will be worth a lot of money, I hesitate to say it lest saying it curses my chances of ever owning such an item, but it would be priceless if produced in low quantities. (I said so because I don't mind Goldie making a few bucks for his art.) The limited edition vinyl copy (of the shorter but still quite comprehensive and definitely cohesively a complete work of art as an album,)album, which I believe had a blue and white cover like it's counterpart cd ( featuring INNER CITY LIFE, PRESSURE and JAH,) is arguably priceless if it exists until it is re pressed on vinyl for commercial release. Then it would still be worth hundreds but not thousands depending on how many were pressed and sold. My personal obsession with the original album or the second main version (sometimes known as "Timeless II",) has inspired me to ask you to mention the vinyl which may exist including the tracks INNER CITY LIFE, PRESSURE and JAH, in at least one of your articles on Timeless by Goldie as it's mere possible existence is EXTREMELY significant in the music world and is likely to interest some of your readers. If you speak to Goldie could you pass it on from me that his fans of the future will want a vinyl edition with INNER CITY LIFE, PRESSURE and JAH as featured on the first main version of the cd release of this album. Please also mention that the multicoloured Timeless II is also crying out to be released on vinyl for serious collectors, fans and djs. I will be trying to obtain such  items myself on an extremely limited budget and believe publicising these artifacts is what they deserve.

Yours sincerely, 

               Michael Munn of Bristol UK. ... PERHAPS you could forward this entire letter to Goldie with my email address (rationalparty99@hotmail.com) if you know how at some point?!?! I believe I met the man at Lakota In Bristol one time upstairs in the drum and bass room. Oddly for me I didn't recognise him by his famous Gold teeth until years afterwards as I was intoxicated and oblivious to my luck on the dancefloor. Oh well. It won't happen again.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.85.198.116 (talk) 01:19, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Discussion regarding terminology of singles

I have started a discussion regarding how Wikipedia should define singles. Please go here to discuss.--3family6 (Talk to me | See what I have done) 19:01, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

Lack of Harsh Noise Entry

Hello! I'm new to this WikiProject, so I apologize if this isn't the right place to put this mention. I see that the Harsh Noise page links back to the Noise Music page. I think there's a good enough argument to make it it's own separate sub-categorical page. I think it would be good to create one! Joeyvandernaald (talk) 15:02, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

New book relating to post-disco, post-punk, and hip-hop

New book, looks useful for historical info on post-disco, post-punk, and hip-hop in NYC. Life and Death on the New York Dance Floor, 1980-1983 by Tim Lawrence, 2016, Duke University Press. Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 15:54, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Greetings WikiProject Electronic music/Archive 1 Members!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about a technical proposal to revive your Popular Pages list in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

If the above proposal gets in the Top 10 based on the votes, there is a high likelihood of this bot being restored so your project will again see monthly updates of popular pages.

Further, there are over 260 proposals in all to review and vote for, across many aspects of wikis.

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 17:59, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Oh Yeah (Yello song)

Oh yeah! This article would be a whole lot better with a short sound excerpt. Could somebody do that? 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:56, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

I think there's one in Yello#Musical_style. Can't check it on this crummy computer. --Dweller (talk) Become old fashioned! 15:32, 3 January 2017 (UTC)
 Done Thanks. Will add it. Beautiful! 7&6=thirteen (☎) 15:37, 3 January 2017 (UTC)

We – Community Tech – are happy to announce that the Popular pages bot is back up-and-running (after a one year hiatus)! You're receiving this message because your WikiProject or task force is signed up to receive the popular pages report. Every month, Community Tech bot will post at Wikipedia:WikiProject Electronic music/Archive 1/Popular pages with a list of the most-viewed pages over the previous month that are within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music.

We've made some enhancements to the original report. Here's what's new:

  • The pageview data includes both desktop and mobile data.
  • The report will include a link to the pageviews tool for each article, to dig deeper into any surprises or anomalies.
  • The report will include the total pageviews for the entire project (including redirects).

We're grateful to Mr.Z-man for his original Mr.Z-bot, and we wish his bot a happy robot retirement. Just as before, we hope the popular pages reports will aid you in understanding the reach of WikiProject Electronic music, and what articles may be deserving of more attention. If you have any questions or concerns please contact us at m:User talk:Community Tech bot.

Warm regards, the Community Tech Team 17:16, 17 May 2017 (UTC)


Article alerts

This is a notice to let you know about Article alerts, a fully-automated subscription-based news delivery system designed to notify WikiProjects and Taskforces when articles are entering Articles for deletion, Requests for comment, Peer review and other workflows (full list). The reports are updated on a daily basis, and provide brief summaries of what happened, with relevant links to discussion or results when possible. A certain degree of customization is available; WikiProjects and Taskforces can choose which workflows to include, have individual reports generated for each workflow, have deletion discussion transcluded on the reports, and so on. An example of a customized report can be found here.

If you are already subscribed to Article Alerts, it is now easier to report bugs and request new features. We are also in the process of implementing a "news system", which would let projects know about ongoing discussions on a wikipedia-wide level, and other things of interest. The developers also note that some subscribing WikiProjects and Taskforces use the display=none parameter, but forget to give a link to their alert page. Your alert page should be located at "Wikipedia:PROJECT-OR-TASKFORCE-HOMEPAGE/Article alerts". Questions and feedback should be left at Wikipedia talk:Article alerts.

Message sent by User:Addbot to all active wiki projects per request, Comments on the message and bot are welcome here.

Thanks. — Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 09:06, 15 March, 2009 (UTC)

Genre Stubs AFD's round 2

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Ridernyc (talk • contribs) 12:50, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Notaker for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Notaker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Notaker until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) 18:26, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Acousmatic Room Orchestration System

The article Acousmatic Room Orchestration System has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Promotional advertising by COI/SPA whose only edits on three different projects are all for this product.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mathglot (talk) 07:23, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Sub-project EDM

Hello, fellow participants of the electronic music WikiProject. I plan on forming a sub-WikiProject called "Electronic dance music" that would group related articles. Electronic music (EM) and electronic dance music (EDM) are different. The latter is a genre and the former is music that is made with electronic instruments. EDM consists of many sub-genres like house, trap, trance, techno and many other dance/club-type genres, and most of these sub-genres have sub-genres of their own (e.g. house > deep house > tropical house) and fusion genres (e.g. trouse = trance x house). EDM should have its own project because it is incredibly significant in the music world as it is regarded as "the one for the future" and there are many interested editors. The project may consist of the following topics: dance music, DJ-ing, nightclubbing (raves), EDM labels/companies, EDM sub-genres and so much more.

Before I propose the creation of "WikiProject Electronic Dance Music", the advantages and disadvantages of this project should be discussed. Please comment your thoughts. - TheMagnificentist 13:27, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the 'heads up'. I am most certainly interested in this subject, so... Count me in! As my username already reveals, I'm a big fan of 'classic' electronic music like Jarre, Kraftwerk and Vangelis and so on, but also a big fan of more modern electronic music like trance, gabber, techno, eurodance and other related kinds of house music. If there's anything I can have something to say about, I will do my best to provide y'all with some information. Another advantage I may have: I'm from the Netherlands! Why is that an advantage? We brought you 2 Unlimited, more than once the best deejay of the world, we've invented a wide range of styles... I might start to sound cocky right now, but prove me wrong! So, as said before, count me in. Thnx for asking. Oxygene7-13 (talk) 19:12, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
I've got some minor interest in this but mostly stumbled onto this by accident while browsing. While I understand your position (having a tight interest on EDM), I don't quite understand the need for a sub-project of the broader project. Could you elaborate a bit on the need to separate the topics? Would this really be a separate related project, or would it be a task force of this one? -- ferret (talk) 23:28, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
It's supposed to be a related sub-project since EDM and EM are two different topics. IMO, participants who join this project intend to work on EDM-related pages but since EM includes all of electronic music topics, they may feel this project is not for them or may think it is too broad for them to work on a single topic. Creating this new project may help participants identify the exact one they want to work on and it might appear more interesting to new participants. Currently they may feel EM is about classical electronic music and old age disco, so I think forming a new project may help gather them and work as one dance music/club-loving unit that is just about EDM, DJ-ing and raves, excluding the classical stuff and other electronic genres that don't fit in EDM. - TheMagnificentist 10:03, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
  • I don't see any good coming from a separate or even sub WikiProject/task force. If you want to work on the articles, work on them, and if you want to be make a subpage of WP Electronic music because it aids in your editing organization, go for it. But otherwise Wikipedia is littered with WikiProjects in which someone puts a lot of effort into tagging articles (creating a lot of work for other people) but ultimately doesn't have the critical mass to use a common talk page as a sounding board or editing community, and all that tagging effort lies fallow. Even if you were to go through the process of finding 10+ active editors who could actually use the page to coordinate (Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals), I would still wager that the chances are low if the same group doesn't even use the existing Electronic music page to coordinate. The cherry on top: My apocryphal understanding of the phrase "EDM" is that it was a neologism from the rise of Deadmau5/Daft Punk DJs in the US backdated to older genres previously known by more specific genres (house/techno/electro/rave), or plainly under the umbrella of "electronic music" (as in the "D" was redundant). If that's the case, then the WikiProject ("electronic music") already exists. But even if that's wrong, I would make damn sure that there are more than 10 editors who need such a page for coordination before putting in the work and creating the cleanup for others I am no longer watching this page—ping if you'd like a response czar 17:07, 21 July 2017 (UTC)

Discussion at Talk:Hands (Mike Perry song)#Artist credits

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Hands (Mike Perry song)#Artist credits. nyuszika7h (talk) 15:31, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Content (Joywave album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Content (Joywave album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Content (Joywave album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jax 0677 (talk) 16:31, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Reviving

I'm looking to revive this project, as a hub for EDM-loving editors to gather and discuss improvements to the topic. If anyone is interested, you may add your name to the main page and use some of the userboxes. — Zawl 15:50, 29 August 2017 (UTC)


Psychedelic ambient

Please help to expand psychedelic ambient. --Jilja (talk) 17:29, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Bluetech

Bluetech is likely going to be removed again without reliable sources (WP:RS) that significantly and independently cover this topic. --Jilja (talk) 17:32, 31 October 2017 (UTC)

Mihalis Safras

Hi all, I'm not familiar with electronic music articles or the proper references used in those articles. There has been an editing war at Mihalis Safras regarding claims the subject plagiarized music. One editor linked to a primary source, this interview with someone claiming he was plagiarized. There might be better secondary sources about this issue, like this and this, but that all depends on whether or not those sources are suitable for inclusion. I'm hoping that people familiar with the scene can provide some guidance at the article to determine if the content should be included, and how it should be included neutrally. Since this WikiProject seems to be semi-active, I'll cross-post my request at WikiProject Music. Thanks all. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:00, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia has many thousands of wikilinks which point to disambiguation pages. It would be useful to readers if these links directed them to the specific pages of interest, rather than making them search through a list. Members of WikiProject Disambiguation have been working on this and the total number is now below 20,000 for the first time. Some of these links require specialist knowledge of the topics concerned and therefore it would be great if you could help in your area of expertise.

A list of the relevant links on pages which fall within the remit of this wikiproject can be found at http://69.142.160.183/~dispenser/cgi-bin/topic_points.py?banner=WikiProject_Electronic_music

Please take a few minutes to help make these more useful to our readers.— Rod talk 15:23, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Captions in Infobox album

Hello. In Template:Infobox album, I believe that the "caption" parameter should only be used if absolutely necessary; eg. to distinguish a specific version of an album cover that is shown in the infobox. However, I see a lot of album articles (particularly in electronic music, and related to the record label Monstercat) that have every cover with the caption "Cover art" (example). I believe this is compeltely pointless, unnecessary, and that these captions that serve no purpose should be removed.

I have also crossposted this at Template talk:Infobox album and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Music. Thanks, Lazz_R 18:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

I Don't Believe Hip-Hop is an EDM Genre

Like the title says. Sure, some hip-hop subgenres are considered EDM genres (such as Trap and Grime), but not all of them are. Besides, hip-hop inspired EDM, not the other way around. So, if anything, EDM should be a subgenre of hip-hop. Here's a link to a Quora post I found that has more information: https://www.quora.com/Should-hip-hop-be-considered-a-sub-genre-of-electronic-music Bizkit24 (talk) 17:39, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

WikiProject collaboration notice from the Portals WikiProject

The reason I am contacting you is because there are one or more portals that fall under this subject, and the Portals WikiProject is currently undertaking a major drive to automate portals that may affect them.

Portals are being redesigned.

The new design features are being applied to existing portals.

At present, we are gearing up for a maintenance pass of portals in which the introduction section will be upgraded to no longer need a subpage. In place of static copied and pasted excerpts will be self-updating excerpts displayed through selective transclusion, using the template {{Transclude lead excerpt}}.

The discussion about this can be found here.

Maintainers of specific portals are encouraged to sign up as project members here, noting the portals they maintain, so that those portals are skipped by the maintenance pass. Currently, we are interested in upgrading neglected and abandoned portals. There will be opportunity for maintained portals to opt-in later, or the portal maintainers can handle upgrading (the portals they maintain) personally at any time.

Background

On April 8th, 2018, an RfC ("Request for comment") proposal was made to eliminate all portals and the portal namespace. On April 17th, the Portals WikiProject was rebooted to handle the revitalization of the portal system. On May 12th, the RfC was closed with the result to keep portals, by a margin of about 2 to 1 in favor of keeping portals.

There's an article in the current edition of the Signpost interviewing project members about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

Since the reboot, the Portals WikiProject has been busy building tools and components to upgrade portals.

So far, 84 editors have joined.

If you would like to keep abreast of what is happening with portals, see the newsletter archive.

If you have any questions about what is happening with portals or the Portals WikiProject, please post them on the WikiProject's talk page.

Thank you.    — The Transhumanist   07:36, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

RL Grime's Nova album

Hello, RL Grime's second album, Nova, is quickly gaining notability with reviews on Guardian and Pitchfork, and is probably going to chart too, but there's currently no Wikipedia article for it. I'm interested to create it, but I wouldn't wish to work alone and would need some other people joining me to write parts of it (background, singles etc). Is anyone interested? Do comment below if you are, or I'll put this task on hold for a future date (in which the initial hype for the album would die down). aNode (discuss) 12:37, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

I'd be interested in helping, though I may be more of a nuisance more than anything else. For now, i'd recommend you just get another electronic music album, use it as a template and just stick in as many cool references as possible. For a simple album template, I'd currently suggest my WIP of Some Kinds Of Magic as it is pretty small and chill and has most of the basic stuff you'd want in an album article. Constructing the article would take time as well as it is a pretty well-covered subject and there would be a lot of references to get through, so I'd highly recommend you just stick Nova into a draft space or your sandbox and link it here so anybody here could help. Micro (Talk) 13:03, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
@MicroPowerpoint: Yeahhh, I know! I've written my fair share of album articles before at Human (Steve Angello album) and Not All the Beautiful Things. Those however were written completely alone which took up a lot of work and my time. If you would wish to assist, please do! Perhaps you can write the sections that you're comfortable with and I can do mine (critical reception, refs etc.) You up for it? aNode (discuss) 16:10, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
@ANode: I’d try to help whenever I could, but I can’t if you don’t link me the draft or Wip that you’ve been working on so far. If you don’t have a draft/Wip and this is just a concept, I might start it in my sandbox or whatever. Micro (Talk) 21:46, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
@MicroPowerpoint: Alrighttt, I'll get started on it soon. Gotta finish a task I'm working on first, then I'll get the page ready. Will ping you here when the page is started! aNode (discuss) 02:59, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

A draft for the album has been created at Draft:Nova (RL Grime album). Micro (Talk) 07:59, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

Nina Kraviz Article Doctor? No realiable source for such an academic degree

Hello Community,

I doubt, that she was a dentist or has a doctoral degree - the reference source is not working and in social media there are no concrete references about her academic career. Additionally I didnt find the dissertation.

... Open for discussion, hopefully I am wrong and we will find a realiable source. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bene2510 (talk • contribs) 17:16, 15 October 2018 (UTC)

@Bene2510: From the archived source located in Kraviz's page, [6], it states: "Nina is originally from Irkutsk in Siberia, on the shores of Lake Baikal and to the north of Mongolia. She made the 5000km trip west to Moscow when she was 19 to study dentistry, and still lives in the Russian capital, though she spends an increasing amount of time on the road." You're right, there's no source on the doctorate. I'm changing it to state that she just studied dentistry. aNode (discuss) 04:44, 16 October 2018 (UTC)

RfC on hip house

There is a RfC about the scope of the hip house term at Talk:Hip house#RfC: Is hip house a present day trend? RoseCherry64 (talk) 21:20, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Inactive members

Just a small observation, there's lots of inactive members on the "Current member projects" section, which take up lots of space. Can we remove those editors who hasn't edited for over 6 months? aNode (discuss) 04:41, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Future bass

Anyone wanna assist in cleanup and improvement of this article? After Binksternet cleaned up the article, I followed-up with further removals and recovery of lost info with references to go with it. Both these edits were in response to an Australian mobile IP user who raised these concerns on Bink’s Talk page in good faith. My initial issues with the artist section as I described in the Talk page were as follows:

  • Stylisations were re-added to the section against a prior consensus. This was addressed in my follow-up.
  • Column division was removed; this was restored by me.
  • Artists without wiki pages were restored from a previous revision, which have now been removed again.

Thanks in advance for any assistance provided. 66.87.148.148 (talk) 20:59, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Can there be little information added about the producer? Nooraalkhalifa (talk) 07:47, 3 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Portal:David Guetta for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether Portal:David Guetta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:David Guetta until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America1000 02:38, 26 March 2019 (UTC)

A new newsletter directory is out!

A new Newsletter directory has been created to replace the old, out-of-date one. If your WikiProject and its taskforces have newsletters (even inactive ones), or if you know of a missing newsletter (including from sister projects like WikiSpecies), please include it in the directory! The template can be a bit tricky, so if you need help, just post the newsletter on the template's talk page and someone will add it for you.

– Sent on behalf of Headbomb. 03:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Portal:Electronic music for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether Portal:Electronic music is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The page will be discussed at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Electronic music until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the page during the discussion, including to improve the page to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the deletion notice from the top of the page. North America1000 11:53, 25 May 2019 (UTC)

Ishkur 3.0

I am not sure how active this project is nowadays, but we should all be aware that Ishkur's Guide to Electronic Music v3.0 is out and we should expect Wikipedia to be flooded with a fresh wave of poorly sourced articles about dubious microgenres, like it was after the release of v2.5 over a decade ago. Keep an eye out and merge/redirect/AfD as appropriate. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 10:28, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Request for information on WP1.0 web tool

Hello and greetings from the maintainers of the WP 1.0 Bot! As you may or may not know, we are currently involved in an overhaul of the bot, in order to make it more modern and maintainable. As part of this process, we will be rewriting the web tool that is part of the project. You might have noticed this tool if you click through the links on the project assessment summary tables.

We'd like to collect information on how the current tool is used by....you! How do you yourself and the other maintainers of your project use the web tool? Which of its features do you need? How frequently do you use these features? And what features is the tool missing that would be useful to you? We have collected all of these questions at this Google form where you can leave your response. Walkerma (talk) 04:24, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Talk:Synthesizer#Module section

Is anyone available to help us get consensus regarding Popcornduff's removal of uncited sections from Synthesizer? ~Kvng (talk) 16:28, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned article

I've just stumbled across the Nakadia article about a Thai DJ based in Berlin, tagged by this project, which has no links from the mainspace at all. It would be helpful if someone familiar with the topic area could fix that. Thryduulf (talk) 12:28, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

I have added a link just now out of the existing mention at Guernsey Festival of Performing Arts. Article was already linked from List of Thai people. Jalen Folf (talk) 14:42, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Merge proposal at Moog synthesizer

I've proposed merging Moog synthesizer into several articles. Opinions needed. Discussion here. Popcornduff (talk) 14:47, 14 December 2019 (UTC)

Article issues.

There are comments at Talk:Acid house#Assessment and tags which may be of interest to members. Otr500 (talk) 15:05, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Proposed article deletion: List of classic synthesizers

Discussion here. Opinions welcome. Popcornduff (talk) 01:19, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

Looking for help with synth articles

Hi all. Over the last several months I've been trying to improve our coverage of major electronic musical instruments (mainly synths, samplers and drum machines). Before I got started, important articles like synthesizer, Moog synthesizer and Minimoog comprised reams of original research and clutter. It has involved an awful lot of WP:TNT.

I feel I've been making progress, but it's lonely work and there's still lots to do. Unlike on articles to do with albums, movies and games (where I spend most of my Wikipedia efforts), there doesn't seem to be so much activity around these articles. So I'm posting here to invite any interested parties who might be willing to help out.

Any kind of help is appreciated. I'm pretty good at the soft stuff - history, impact and so on - but what would be super useful would be someone who has more technical knowledge than I do and help flesh out the description of how these devices actually work (using proper sources, of course). This is the area I'm least able to contribute to.

If anyone is up to the challenge please don't be shy. Thanks.

I'm also posting this over at WP:MUSINST. Popcornduff (talk) 00:32, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

List of synthesizers

Following the deletion discussion linked above, I've created a new article, List of synthesizers. It needs major expansion, so help is appreciated. Thanks. Popcornduff (talk) 03:09, 28 January 2020 (UTC)

And you've redirected List of classic synthesizers there. ~Kvng (talk) 15:22, 30 January 2020 (UTC)
That's right, as the consensus was that that page should either be deleted or redirected. Popcornduff (talk) 02:12, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
The deletion discussion closed with no consensus which is formally the same as keep. I'm not going to contest your redirect; I just wanted the record to show that killing off List of classic synthesizers was part of your program in creating List of synthesizers. ~Kvng (talk) 04:11, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Well, thanks. And, for the record, I understand the discussion was closed without consensus, but as every responder voted to either delete the page or redirect it to a new List of synthesizers page, I figured that no one would object if I did that. Popcornduff (talk) 07:55, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Saving Light FAC

Howdy y'all, Saving Light (by Gareth Emery and Standerwick, featuring Haliene) is currently up for Featured Article Candidacy. Please vote "support" or "object" with your comments at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Saving Light/archive5. Thanks. Micro (Talk) 08:33, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Uwe Schmidt bio error

I think that I have found an error on the bio page for Uwe Schmidt, but I don't know enough about him to correct it. That is, I need help interpreting what was written.

Under the 1995 - 1998 section there is this sentence: "After a couple of unsuccessful attempts during 1993–1995, still living in Frankfurt, he recorded right tracks in the later declared electrolatino style." I believe that the word "right" should be "eight." The word "right" makes no sense.

Thanks for your help

Gunter Lap — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stalfnzo (talk • contribs) 17:47, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

I have identified this as a typo and have fixed it accordingly. Thank you for bringing this up. Jalen Folf (talk) 17:52, 27 March 2020 (UTC)

Feel free to help with the draft article for Joyryde's debut album 'Brave'

The article for Joyryde's debut album Brave has been submitted as a draft. Feel free to check it out and help improve upon it, whether it would be minor spelling and grammar, or adding entire sections. Micro (Talk) 06:08, 3 April 2020 (UTC)

AfC Catz 'n Dogz

The article for Draft:Catz 'n Dogz has been submitted as a draft. After the first submission was rejected, improvements have been made but any additional references and improvements would help Littletishtash (talk) 15:06, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

Wiki-ad for this project:

I made a Wiki-ad for this WikiProject, it suits the project well:

«ias!|,,.|usbk» 19:54, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Merge proposal: Stardust (band)

I've proposed that Stardust (band) be merged into Music Sounds Better with You. This was done before in 2015, but then unmerged, so I'd like to gain wider consensus on it. If you have views on this please participate at Talk:Music Sounds Better with You#Merge proposal (May 2020). TSP (talk) 02:41, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Both subjects are notable and have reliable sources, but if not enough expansion and improvement is done to the two articles, then the merge should happen. «ias!|,,.|usbk» 02:14, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Thanks I'm Aya Syameimaru! - could you contribute at Talk:Music Sounds Better with You#Merge proposal (May 2020) rather than here please? TSP (talk) 12:13, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
Yes, I may go ahead. «ias!|,,.|usbk» 12:31, 18 May 2020 (UTC)

AfC Dave Nada

I started an article on Moombahton creator Dave Nada. The draft has been submitted here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Dave_Nada . "Dave Nada" currently redirects to the moombahton genre page. Any help on editing the page and the review would be helpful! (note for transparency - I know him and have declared so on my user page) Feedback very welcome! SoundScenario (talk) 02:26, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

The article has now been approved. -iaspostb□x+ 06:54, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

consciouselectronic.com

This website does not appear to be unreliable but I have very limited knowledge of electronic music sites beyond the really well known ones like dancing astronaut and youredm.com, and was wondering if this would be a trustworthy source or not? -- Carlobunnie (talk) 01:55, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Actually the website has real staff and some decent quality maintenance. -iaspostb□x+ 10:40, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Assessing several WP:EMU articles.

I have been quickly assessing several Electronic music articles lately (I think I assessed around a thousand articles or something), how does that sound? -iaspostb□x+ 07:11, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Well, here's the proof that just came out very recently: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AWikiProject_Electronic_music%2FPopular_pages&type=revision&diff=971356026&oldid=966192303 -iaspostb□x+ 17:59, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Jean-Michel Jarre GAR

I am doing a GAR on article about of the greatest and most essential electronic musicians of all-time: Jean-Michel Jarre. Participate in this link here: Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Jean-Michel Jarre/1. ias:postb□x 13:01, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

GAR closed with "delist". -iaspostb□x+ 18:14, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

Proposal of interest

Members of this WikiProject and anybody who works on music-related articles might be interested in a proposal I've started. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 14:19, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

MCMXC a.D.

Hello, I have put the article, MCMXC a.D., up for peer review. I would appreciate it if anyone could peer review this article. For context, MCMXC a.D. is a new-age album made by the band, Enigma, which at the time consisted of Michael Cretu, Frank Peterson, Sandra Cretu, Fabrice Cuitad, and Louisa Stanley. The album contains the singles, "Sadeness (Part I)", "Mea Culpa (Part II)", "Principles of Lust", and "The Rivers of Belief". It isn't popular now, but back in the early 1990s, this album was really popular and successful. Lazman321 (talk) 23:08, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

How does importance work?

Hello, I'm new to engaging with wikiprojects and wondering how importance works and how I can become involved in that aspect of this wikiproject. Obvs I've got an article in mind that I think could use a reassessment but mostly I'm just curious about how it works re:consensus-building generally and in this project in particular. Thanks for insights! TheMusicExperimental (talk) 18:55, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

See Wikipedia:Version_1.0_Editorial_Team/Release_Version_Criteria#Priority_of_topic for a description. Let me know if you have any questions or need anyone to look over your shoulder as you get started. ~Kvng (talk) 14:31, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

The Orb featured article review

I have nominated The Orb for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. RetiredDuke (talk) 12:04, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

Requested article: Powertran Transcendent 2000

First synth of Thomas Dolby & used on Unknown Pleasures

  • Dolby, Thomas (11 October 2016). "The Winter of Discontent". The Speed of Sound: Breaking the Barriers Between Music and Technology: A Memoir (First ed.). New York: Flatiron Books. ISBN 978-1-250-07184-2. OCLC 940280931. On the way home I took a shortcut along the river and swung by the back of the EMS shop. There was a garbage dumpster outside in the street. No one was around, so I heaved myself up and had a gander inside. A bunch of flattened cardboard boxes, an old fridge, and ... hold on: a black metal box with lots of knobs. The guts were hanging out of it, but I could see the words TRANSCENDENT 2000 printed on the front.
  • Mulligan, Jesse (2 November 2016). "Thomas Dolby on music, technology and creativity". RNZ. Retrieved 16 November 2020.
  • James, Ben. "Powertran Transcendent 2000". VST 4 FREE. Retrieved 11 November 2020.
  • "Powertran Transcendent 2000". electro-music.com. Retrieved 11 November 2020.
  • "Powertran Transcendent 2000". cykong.com. Retrieved 11 November 2020.
  • "Transcendent Powertran 2000 [PCB Schematic]". midierror. 7 January 2015. Retrieved 11 November 2020.
  • Crane, Larry. "Thomas Dolby: Breaking the Barriers". tapeop.com. Retrieved 11 November 2020.
  • https://www.americanradiohistory.com/hd2/IDX-UK/Technology/Technology-Modern/Archive-Practical-Electronics-IDX/IDX/80s/PE-1982-04-OCR-Page-0002.pdf
  • https://web.archive.org/web/20201111033218/https://www.epanorama.net/sff/Audio/Musical/Circuits/Transcendent%202000%20Synthesizer.pdf
  • "Powertran Transcendent 2000 , by Chris Wareham". Vintage Synth Explorer. Retrieved 11 November 2020.
2601:646:200:120:C0B3:FD0E:F5C8:B992 (talk) 16:46, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Deletion of notable audio examples

see here, Clear/Techno Music/Big Fun - not seeing the point of these deletions, chime in if anything to add. Acousmana (talk) 21:43, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

new article - Guy J

Right folks, I usually edit science articles but made an article on Guy J. Just feeling my way round sources etc. If anyonw wants to help me expand it they are most welcome to :) Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 09:04, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Resident Advisor is the best resource for this level of artist. Ceoil (talk) 17:54, 1 January 2021 (UTC)
Yes, found it now XD Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 02:39, 8 January 2021 (UTC)

Cinq études de bruits by Pierre Schaeffer

Specifically "Etude aux tourniquets": After contacting the composer Michel Chion I learned that there has been for a long, since at least when the liner notes for 1er Panorama de Musique Concrete were translated into english, a misrepresentation of what a tourniquet is in this context. It's not a whistling top. It is a hollow metal toy with a noisemaker inside similar to a music box, but not arranged as such to play a particular tune. There is a crank on top of the metal casing to turn the barrel inside that plucks the metal tongues.2600:100F:B020:1E2A:2C37:214B:D043:A67A (talk) 04:09, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

Draft: Aztec Records

I am looking for people to help me develop this article:* 6 Jan 2021 – Draft:Aztec Records (talk · Records&action=edit edit · Records&action=history hist) need to be developed with more references. New References are in draft´s talk page (t · c) — Preceding undated comment added 10:35, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

I've added some advice to the draft. ~Kvng (talk) 23:32, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Draft:Solstice (musician)

Hi folks. I have written this new article Draft:Solstice (musician) about the electronic music Hardstyle producer Solstice. I would like to receive feedback to improve the article. If anyone wants to participate to expand the information, I would be very grateful. Cclgnd (talk) 13:15, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Quique genre

There is a discussion on the talk page about including genres in the infobox of the article on Quique. Any contributions would be helpful. Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:59, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

More opinions needed at Delay effect

More opinions would be appreciated about unsourced material at Delay effect. Thanks. Popcornfud (talk) 11:49, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

FAR for John Frusciante

I have nominated John Frusciante for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Z1720 (talk) 15:44, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

FAR for Sasha (DJ)

I have nominated Sasha (DJ) for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Hog Farm Talk 17:32, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Request for opinions aiding a four-sentence-long article merge

See discussion at Talk:Vaporwave#Proposed merge of Future funk into Vaporwave. Lots of Future funk fans chiming in to say that the genre should have its own article, seemingly unfamiliar with the concept of WP:OVERLAP and WP:REPUTABLE. ili (talk) 17:07, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

New article about Paradisio's singer, María Isabel García Asensio

I someone could make that happen, it would be nice. - Joaquin89uy (talk) 14:54, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Paul Oakenfold

Would someone here mind taking over watchlisting this article from me? I know nothing about the subject (it only ended up on my watchlist due to disruption) and it seems he's planning on being pretty active this year. Thanks! Graham87 05:10, 11 January 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Ludovico Technique (band)

Hey all! I have created an article on the band Draft: Ludovico Technique (band). The group has reemerged over the past year after a long hiatus. I'd love feedback if anyone has any :) Thank you!CorinneWestbrook (talk) 22:08, 16 April 2022 (UTC)

User script to detect unreliable sources

Main page: User:Headbomb/unreliable

I have (with the help of others) made a small user script to detect and highlight various links to unreliable sources and predatory journals. Some of you may already be familiar with it, given it is currently the 39th most imported script on Wikipedia. The idea is that it takes something like

  • John Smith "Article of things" Deprecated.com. Accessed 2020-02-14. (John Smith "[https://www.deprecated.com/article Article of things]" ''Deprecated.com''. Accessed 2020-02-14.)

and turns it into something like

It will work on a variety of links, including those from {{cite web}}, {{cite journal}} and {{doi}}.

The script is mostly based on WP:RSPSOURCES, WP:NPPSG and WP:CITEWATCH and a good dose of common sense. I'm always expanding coverage and tweaking the script's logic, so general feedback and suggestions to expand coverage to other unreliable sources are always welcomed.

Do note that this is not a script to be mindlessly used, and several caveats apply. Details and instructions are available at User:Headbomb/unreliable. Questions, comments and requests can be made at User talk:Headbomb/unreliable.

- Headbomb {t · c · p · b}

This is a one time notice and can't be unsubscribed from. Delivered by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:01, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Discussion at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 May 6 § File:Diddy-DirtyMoney-HelloGoodMorning.JPEG

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2022 May 6 § File:Diddy-DirtyMoney-HelloGoodMorning.JPEG. Marchjuly (talk) 22:58, 6 May 2022 (UTC)

All You Need Is Love (JAMs song) Featured article review

I have nominated All You Need Is Love (JAMs song) for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:14, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:IIII (album)#Requested move 2 January 2023

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:IIII (album)#Requested move 2 January 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. UtherSRG (talk) 21:23, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Opinions required at Ableton Live

There is a dispute about whether to include a list of release notes at Ableton Live. More opinions, please. Popcornfud (talk) 15:41, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

Joe Bermudez

Despite knowing very little about house music, I have made a modest start on an article on Joe Bermudez, since I noticed he had 3 number one dance hits to his credit. Improvements would be welcome. Brianyoumans (talk) 17:01, 26 May 2022 (UTC)

Draft:Cercle (media) article review

Please review Draft:Cercle (media) article again. I've added more data and sources links. Tomasz w (talk) 14:35, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Electronic dance music

An article that you have been involved in editing—Electronic dance music—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 17:58, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Seeking a new rating from a more experienced editor

Hi there! I've been working on the page for the musician Attlas for a while now and would appreciate some feedback as to the direction and content. It's a part of several wikiprojects, but since there wasn't any initial rating from the electronic music one, I figured I'd start here. I'll be honest, as a relatively new editor I don't know the exact process for getting the ratings updated, but I appreciate any direction or help. Thanks in advance! Superlucer (talk) 23:00, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Nice work! I've given it a B rating. That's as high as you'll get from a quick informal review. If you ave higher aspirations, have a look at WP:GA, WP:FA and WP:PR. ~Kvng (talk) 00:03, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

A-class article assessment

How to start article assessment for A-class? It's an article about the song "Fest i hela huset" by Swedish musician Basshunter. Eurohunter (talk) 15:49, 13 April 2023 (UTC)

Image of Artiphon Instrument 1

Hello all. I was wondering if any members of this WikiProject has an Artiphon Instrument 1 in their possession, and could upload an image of it to Commons. I need it for a draft I'm writing. Thanks, Schminnte (talk • contribs) 20:20, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:State to State (808 State albums)#Requested move 5 May 2023

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:State to State (808 State albums)#Requested move 5 May 2023 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. – MaterialWorks 13:27, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Earmilk reliability

Question came up on WP:DISCORD regarding Earmilk's possible reliability as a source. Having looked into it, I see Wikipedia:WikiProject Electronic music/Sources lists it as reliable, but that addition was made unilaterally based solely on the site's about page. Personally, I don't see it. I even looked at the latest archived version from before that edit and it's the exact same text. That page doesn't make any mention of an editorial team, list any of their writers' credentials, or any of the telltale signs of reliability, and that alone should not get it listed. So I figure I should ask here: is that listing legitimate anyway? Is this site any good? QuietHere (talk | contributions) 12:51, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Due to the lack of response, I’ve decided to boldly remove the listing myself. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 15:41, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Years In Electronic Music

Do y'all mind if I start making articles for years in electronic music? Other genres have pages documenting events and albums in specific years of that genre (2006 in rock, 1985 in jazz, 1999 in metal, for example) but Electronic music doesn't have these. One is linked in several recent year in music pages like 2022 in music but its a red link.

It would take a while cause there are obviously a lot of years to cover. I think it'd have to start sometime in the 60s or maybe 70s. Could just start with this year. The rock ones only go back to 2006 and that page was made just last year Carolina Heart (talk) 19:50, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

No objection but be aware that the pages you give as examples are not getting a lot of page views so your effort is not likely to be of great benefit to readers. ~Kvng (talk) 14:37, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

Draft:Crywolf

Hello WP Electronic music, I recently wrapped up my work on Draft:Crywolf about a decently successful experimental musician and would like to receive some feedback on it. I modelled his page off of Mothica due to them kinda existing in the same sphere online so I'm hoping to match that article's C-class rating at the minimum. Crywolf is redlinked from a couple obscure places but appears to have been speedy deleted over lack of significance so if anyone could quickly confirm mine passes both significance and notability that would be much appreciated in particular.Orchastrattor (talk) 02:12, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Mike Dred for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mike Dred is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Dred until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Box of wolves (feed) 04:29, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Proposed merge of Unfold (song) into Nurture (album)

I've opened a merge discussion at Talk:Unfold (song) that concerns this WikiProject. I'd appreciate any input from members! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 16:36, 30 July 2023 (UTC)

Madonna bibliography

What are criteria for Articles section? Artist such Madonna should have thousands of articles every dekade. Eurohunter (talk) 20:25, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Looks like this is just for articles written by Madonna, not just about her. Remainsuncertain (talk) 20:29, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Underscores article

I'm working on an article for Underscores & would love some feedback / help working on it - I submitted it for review through AfC (since I'm relatively new to editing and wanted to be sure I was getting it right) & was declined for sourcing and notability.

I see the issues w sourcing - I used several self-published sources as sources on themselves, but some of them were admittedly iffy. I took out the ones that I think were problematic; there are still two self-published sources in the draft (references 11 & 15), and I'd really appreciate it if someone could take a look and let me know if those two are acceptable as sources on herself.

As far as notability goes, I'm a little confused - I asked the reviewer for clarification, but haven't gotten a response, so I'd also appreciate some other experienced editors' input. I based the article on the notability guideline "Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself." The published works in question are this article in Rolling Stone, this article in the Atlantic, this article (along with others) in Ones To Watch (which is an established & reliable newsblog), and this article (along with others I didn't include, since I thought I had established notability) by The Fader. Since the rule of thumb I've seen is three published works, I thought this was more than enough - thoughts?

I have other questions about how to improve this article, but I want to make sure it's notable enough in the first place before I waste anyone's time with all that. Thanks so much to anyone who can help! Remainsuncertain (talk) 03:37, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

The sources you identify above do clearly establish notability. You shouldn't need to remove iffy sources to get AFC approval. However, acceptance standards tend vary with individual AFC reviewers and can make AFC feel like an unpredictable gauntlet. Sorry about this. I have resubmitted and accepted the draft. Thanks and congratulations. Please feel free to continue to make improvements in mainspace. ~Kvng (talk) 16:19, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
Awesome!! Thanks so much for your help, and no worries at all. Sidenote: would you be willing to explain what you mean by "You shouldn't need to remove iffy sources to get AFC approval?" Thanks again!! Remainsuncertain (talk) 19:05, 21 August 2023 (UTC)
WP:AFC is looking for reasonable drafts on notable subjects. The drafts must be free of WP:CV and severe WP:NPOV issues. WP:BLP drafts require some additional care. Use of iffy references is an article quality issue and poor article quality is not a good reason for an AFC submission to be declined. Article quality will be improved by a diversity of skilled editors working in mainspace. Quaity is much less likely to be improved in draft space. ~Kvng (talk) 16:07, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
Ahhhh got it. Thanks!! Remainsuncertain (talk) 20:01, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Updates to Bassnectar

Hi - I've just rewritten the bulk of Bassnectar and am hoping to get some feedback on the changes. I would also like to request a re-assessment of the page in terms of importance and rating, with at least C rating and mid importance. Thanks in advance, I appreciate the help and discussion. Pdubs.94 (talk) 17:32, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Hello all, I am reviewing articles by importance to gain a better understanding of the classifications assigned. However, I am seeing a trend I think is worth discussing. There are many articles related to The Future Sound of London (FSOL) and Brian Dougans that are noted of "Top Importance"

In review of other non-FSOL-related articles noted as Top Importance, such as Minimoog, Daft Punk, Tiësto, Wendy Carlos, or even the Roland TR-808 (classified as High Importance), all provide context as to why they are so important. FSOL articles do not appear to do this.

If an article merits Top Importance, it's relevance should at minimum be stated as part of its intro paragraph. Until these articles can be revised to include this context and highlight their importance, I suggest they are reclassified to a lower tier. Pdubs.94 (talk) 18:53, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

I run across this occasionally. I assume it is a misunderstanding on the part of the original article creator. It looks like you have corrected these. I think you missed Stakker Humanoid. I have taken care of that. ~Kvng (talk) 15:18, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Stereotype (Karl Wolf album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stereotype (Karl Wolf album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stereotype (Karl Wolf album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

--Jax 0677 (talk) 18:37, 20 November 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Let Go (KMFDM album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Let Go (KMFDM album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Let Go (KMFDM album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jax 0677 (talk) 12:01, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Courting#Requested move 9 January 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Courting#Requested move 9 January 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 21:10, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

Standardization of festival pages

This looks like a very good opportunity for is to broadly increase quality of articles falling under this project. When comparing Coachella (festival) toElectric Forest, it's clear that the EF page leaves a lot to be desired. The EF page also suffers from 95% of its content being annual lineups of its performers, when this content should be WP:SPINOFF to its own page so the main article can focus on content similar to the Coachella article.

While I understand that not many festivals have the coverage or content that Coachella does, we can still strive to mimic structure. Let me know your thoughts, thanks! Pdubs.94 (talk) 03:25, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

For smaller articles, it may not make sense to WP:SPINOFF. Though there is a potential WP:UNDUE issue when 95% of content is lists of lineups. In general, I support using the structure of high-quality as a template for improving lower-quality ones. Do keep in mind that there are multiple ways to do things good and Wikipedia does not place a lot of value on consistency between articles (consistency within an article is valued). ~Kvng (talk) 15:26, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
makes sense to me. i think i can surmise where it makes to "template" pages and also where we don't need to spinoff lineups. overall it's probably still a good approach to try and mimic structure but understand that they are "loose" models for structuring articles Pdubs.94 (talk) 19:58, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Recent trends/subgenres in dubstep

Hi, as someone who is fairly involved in the dubstep scene, I wanted to contribute by helping add what I believe to be some pretty notable missing information (subgenres, trends, artists, etc) about some of the more recent trends in dubstep. For example, I see a brief mention of Colour Bass in the current article, but it leaves out mention of other major trends from around the same time such as Marauda's popularization of Tearout, the Excision-led rise of Briddim, iterations of "New" Riddim from artists such as Voltra, future riddim and a whole bunch more. I wanted to ask if there was a certain approach to tackle this with, as I would love to help write about these, just wanted to know if anyone had any plans to do this or if I can potentially start writing about these things. Desx74 (talk) 05:46, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Electronic_music/Archive_1&oldid=1257779641"