Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Catholicism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard regarding the reliability of Aleteia. The thread is Aleteia. Thank you. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 03:17, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I recently created Draft:Leon Podles. It may be of interest to members of this project. Thriley (talk) 16:51, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Syro-Malabar_Church, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has an RfC for renaming. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. 207.96.32.81 (talk) 16:09, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Godric#Requested move 12 September 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ASUKITE 17:51, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Catholic theology, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has an RfC for value. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Jeaucques Quœure (talk) 03:39, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello! Over the past two years, a vast number of articles related to the Trinity, the Arian controversy, and 4th century Church history have been overhauled and/or bloated with material of a decidedly pro-Arian/anti-Trinitarian slant, including Homoousion, Arian controversy, and dozens more. The main user behind this transformation is AndriesvN, an extremely prolific Arian apologist who runs the blog revelationbyjesuschrist.com, one of whose stated purposes is to "oppose the Trinity doctrine." See his contributions for a sense of their scope and character.

While the user in question often adds serious content and cites legitimate scholarly works, it's consistently written in a polemical tone that fails to meet Wikipedia's Neutral POV principle, and often is improperly cited and/or mixed with original research from his blog. He's also shown himself averse to constructive criticism, as seen from his talk page.

While I've attempted to fix some of the more egregious revisions (e.g. to Athanasius of Alexandria), as a Wikipedia rookie and full-time theology student I lack the bandwidth to revise and factcheck all the articles in question, and for this reason I'm appealing for your help, especially those of you who have background in theology/Church history. Your assistance with reviewing, revising and factchecking these articles is greatly appreciated. Thank you!

(And of course, feel free to get any other community involved if you think they could help. I'm about to ask WikiProject Eastern Orthodoxy.)

- HieronymusNatalis (talk) 08:38, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]