Wikipedia talk:Slogans
Split
[edit]This page was formerly at Wikipedia:Logos and slogans, but was split in April 2008 into Wikipedia:Wikipedia logos and Wikipedia:Slogans. -- Quiddity (talk) 20:48, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
海納百川,有容乃大
[edit]is this a slogan? Should it be included? The'ChampionMan1234 02:35, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- Hm, that's less of a slogan for the encyclopedia as a whole and more a watchword for editors, right? Arlo James Barnes 13:15, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
Slogan
[edit]Hello @Itsquietuptown:! I've noticed that you think that this is vandalism: Special:Diff/837353481. That a constructive slogan ;) We can't hide that Wikipedia has errors. But when you see an error (even in the slogan), you can fix it by yourself. This is the same reason for the typo in the Wikipedia logo ("WikipediA"). Understood? --Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 09:13, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Valerio Bozzolan: OOPS. Sorry! Someone should add "You are free to add any slogan" to prevent this and if adding slogans is really allowed.ITSQUIETUPTOWN talk • contribs 09:16, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
- You are welcome. Anyway, my English is not perfect, so tell me if "#Suggested slogans" does not already mean "You are free to add any slogan". --Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 09:21, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Valerio Bozzolan: Well most of the slogans are old already (e.g Knowledge Shared) but in the history I did see people who added their own additions such as this and this . So it might be allowed, but its best to ask others or at the teahouse or help desk.ITSQUIETUPTOWN talk • contribs 09:51, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
- You are welcome. Anyway, my English is not perfect, so tell me if "#Suggested slogans" does not already mean "You are free to add any slogan". --Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 09:21, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
languages
[edit]Because this page is about Wikipedia, you would think that the language codes that Wikipedia uses would be available from the {{#language:}}
magic word. Apparently not:
{{#language:aii|en}}
→ Assyrian Neo-Aramaic but{{ISO 639 name|aii}}
→ Assyrian Neo-Aramaic{{#language:cpx|en}}
→ Puxian but{{ISO 639 name|cpx}}
→ Pu-Xian Chinese{{#language:mnp|en}}
→ mnp but{{ISO 639 name|mnp}}
→ Min Bei Chinese{{#language:qwh|en}}
→ Huaylas Ancash Quechua but{{ISO 639 name|qwh}}
→ Huaylas Ancash Quechua{{#language:uzs|en}}
→ uzs but{{ISO 639 name|uzs}}
→ Southern Uzbek
And here, just to prove that I haven't written the above incorrectly:
{{#language:jam|en}}
→ Jamaican Creole English agrees with{{ISO 639 name|jam}}
→ Jamaican Creole English
The language names returned by {{ISO 639 name}}
are the names listed in both of ISO 639-2 and ISO 639-3. I do not know what MediaWiki intends these codes to represent (because they do tend to make up their own codes). The proper fix is to get MediaWiki to add definitions for these codes to whatever bit of software it is that {{#language:}}
uses to translate codes to language names.
I'm done with my ranting.
—Trappist the monk (talk) 17:46, 14 August 2020 (UTC)
:tok:
[edit]I've removed the line associated with :Tok:, since there is not presently a Wikipedia in Toki Pona. Should the proposed Toki Pona Wikipedia be elevated to an actual project, I've no objection to re-instating it. However, so long as it isn't actually in existence, I don't think it's worth having on this page. — Red-tailed hawk (nest) 18:05, 28 November 2023 (UTC)