Jump to content

User talk:Valerio Bozzolan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Valerio Bozzolan (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I can't use the IP 178.32.219.190 (meta:User talk:178.32.219.190) as logged user, but this is a dedicated server and so I'm the unique shell user that can SOCKS using this IP. I use this SOCKS server for security reasons.

Decline reason:

Sorry, that range is blocked due to rampant abuse. Speaking personally, that ISP also serves a significant proportion of the spam that hits my own servers. Yamla (talk) 11:06, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thank you @Yamla:. It's sad that it's not techically easy to add an exception for single IPs during a range-block, even for registered users... morover when specific IPs has never done anything nasty... --Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 21:31, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry me @Yamla: here they suggest me to clear my "position": So is there no way to add a single-whitelisted-IP in this IP-range block to allow me to operate as logged user? Because I'm not asking to remove the whole IP-range block. --Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 19:47, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have confirmed the need for IP block exemption with a CheckUser on Meta. The right has been added locally to get around the local range block. You should have no problem editing now MusikAnimal talk 20:57, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism warning

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Slogans. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -ITSQUIETUPTOWN talkcontribs 09:11, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for you work of patrolling. BTW this is not vandalism: Wikipedia talk:Slogans#Slogan. --Valerio Bozzolan (talk) 09:26, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Routine removal of IPBE flag

[edit]

Hello Valerio Bozzolan, as you have been inactive for over a year, we will be processing a routine removal of your IPBE flag, unless you have a specific use-case you can identify by replying here. Best regards, — xaosflux Talk 18:39, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

minus Removed Hello, to follow up on the message above: this account flag has been removed for inactivity. Should you require this again in the future you may request by following the directions on this page: Wikipedia:IP block exemption. Best regards, — xaosflux Talk 00:22, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]