Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Pharmacology/Assessment/Archive

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive of requested assessments for pharmacology articles

[edit]

2011

[edit]
  • fen-phen. Please note that I have COI issues which have been posted on the fenphen discussion page. I have included a government document that is to be found only on my site. It is a 20 year old intramural NIDA protocol. Although my name is on the protocol, that was a courtesy by the authors. Another citation which is cited on pubmed has the full text linked also to my google site. Are these citations Wiki appropriate?

I have passed this article by an academic friend who states that from his expert knowledge I have been factual and unbiased. Do tell me otherwise. User:Scientizzle has been helpful. PietrH (talk) 22:23, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Rated Start. See Talk:Fenfluramine/phentermine#Rating for more information. --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 14:41, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

2010

[edit]
I have made further improvements since placing this request, although I am not sure if it qualifies as a 'B' class article. Best regards, Captain n00dle\Talk 18:46, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Rated High/Start, see Talk:Amantadine/Archive 1#Rating. --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 20:10, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Rated Start, see Talk:Olanzapine/fluoxetine for some suggestions. --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 22:34, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Rated B. The references section could do with some cleanup, otherwise you're not far from a Good Article in my opinion. --ἀνυπόδητος (talk) 18:16, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I feel like this article must've come a long way since it was last reviewed. It is, at a minimum, a C-class article. I think that it is probably a B and may even merit a good article nomination, though I haven't looked at it thoroughly enough to go that far. horsedreamer 15:18, 18 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done I've assessed this as C-class, and left some notes on the talk page about further improvement, which I'll try and work on. Perspeculum (talk) 14:27, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2009

[edit]

We're a group of pharmacystudents from Iceland that made this article. We would like to get it assessed to see how we did. This is a new page.

checkY Done. Assessed as B-class, could easily become a Good Article with a bit more work. If you are allowed, feel free to request input and/or help at WT:PHARM and WT:MED. Happy editing! Fvasconcellos (t·c) 16:48, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This is currently rated as start/top. I feel it is neither a start, nor is it of top importance. It should probably be rerated as stub, and the importance should be lowered to mid/low. Given that it is country specific, there is no justification for a top importance rating. Chaldor (talk) 04:45, 16 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done I've reviewed it. Renaissancee (talk) 03:27, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done rated. Renaissancee (talk) 03:27, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry to say, but I don't see that the article fulfills criteria for a ‘B-Class’ rate. Project members should consider WP:1.0/B - especially (2), (3), and (5). I would suggest a rating of ‘start’ or ‘C’ at the very best. -- Alfie (talk) 01:15, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Article removed from B class down to C glass. B class must pass a review examination before recieving the 'B' class. Renaissancee (talk) 03:27, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

2008

[edit]

Undated

[edit]
 Done Rated C – good content, but needs some cleanup (see Wikipedia:Peer review/Discovery and development of TRPV1 antagonists/archive1 for a start)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Pharmacology/Assessment/Archive&oldid=1146003747"