Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2024 July 11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< July 10 << Jun | July | Aug >> July 12 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


July 11

[edit]

00:51, 11 July 2024 review of submission by Thugpoetak

[edit]

HEY DEAR I WANT TO CLAIM MY SPOTIFY ARTIST PROFILE THATS WHY THEY ARE DEMANDING MY WIKIPEDIA I REALLY WANT TO PUBLISH THIS Thugpoetak (talk) 00:51, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Author blocked for a very obvious reason. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 02:31, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Any platform that hard-requires a Wikipedia article for verification is incompetent. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 06:56, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

03:23, 11 July 2024 review of submission by AlexBW0524

[edit]

I received feedback about the article submitted for publication that it did not demonstrate enough solo works outside of her group NewJeans, and does not have enough individual notability. I then edited the article as per these recommendations by adding information about a campaign she did for the the South Korean National Elections Commission and information about her campaign with Chanel Beauty's N°1 de Chanel Red Camellia line. I was wondering if I have improved the article to better show individual notability? Additionally, I did my best to properly cite the sources, however I would appreciate someone checking that I did so correctly. AlexBW0524 (talk) 03:23, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@AlexBW0524: I haven't analysed the sources in detail (you get that when you resubmit the draft for another review), but if the only new content you've added is about some modelling work she has done, this is unlikely to help with the notability issue. The point that the reviewer made was that she is notable only or mainly as part of the group, and we would need to see evidence of her own notability as an individual musician rather than a group member. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:03, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, thank you for responding. I'm a bit confused as her fellow group member Hanni Pham has a published wikipedia page with similar credentials. Specifically similar pre-debut filmography, both have exactly 2 writing credits for their group's works on extremely notable singles, brand endorsement work, etc. I'm not sure in this case why her group member's page would be published while hers would not? If you or someone else could point out what specifically about her group member's activities is different enough to have qualified for notability, that would be extremely helpful since it's currently unclear to me what exactly differentiates their activities enough that one is more independently notable than the other. AlexBW0524 (talk) 05:08, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@AlexBW0524: without analysing the draft and its sources, I can't really comment (you'll note that I said I hadn't done that, I was earlier merely remarking on your additional edits), except to say that we don't assess drafts by comparison to other similar drafts or articles, so whether another member of this girl group has an existing article or not doesn't really come into it. The Hanni (singer) article seems to have been in the process of being reviewed, when it was moved into the main article space by an administrator without leaving an edit summary to explain their thinking, therefore I've no idea what the rationale behind that was. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:11, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, thank you for taking the time to answer my questions to the best of your abilities. I'll continue working on the article in the draft space for the foreseeable future and adding more sources and information. AlexBW0524 (talk) 07:16, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

04:24, 11 July 2024 review of submission by Helposys

[edit]

This page is not unambiguously promotional because it provides general company information that is of public interest. The content has been revised to remove any promotional elements, including the phone number. This page aims to offer neutral and factual information about the company that may be useful to internet users. Helposys (talk) 04:24, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Helposys: you don't ask a question, but this draft has been rejected and is awaiting speedy deletion. Contesting the deletion here at the help desk is pointless, you need to do that on the draft talk page (as indeed you have done). And just to explain, yes, the draft is promotional, because it is the business telling the world about itself (speaking of which, I've posted a paid-editing query on your talk page, please read and respond to it), rather than being based on what independent third parties have said about it, which is what Wikipedia articles should be based on. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 04:56, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

07:47, 11 July 2024 review of submission by Sukhi vale

[edit]

I will added 6 reference for proof Mahroos Siddiquee Nadim is a notable person why not accept it . Please told me details I will recover my mistake. Sukhi vale (talk) 07:47, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sukhi vale: the sources need to meet the WP:GNG guideline for notability; none of the ones cited in this draft do. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:35, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Can you help me for proper reference added please do this you are experiend , I'm new here Sukhi vale (talk) 08:49, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Sukhi vale: thanks (for asking), but no thanks. I've no knowledge of, or interest in, this subject, and we here at the help desk generally don't get involved in co-editing. You could ask at some WikiProjects, eg. WP:WikiProject Football and/or WP:WikiProject India, if anyone there can help. But by and large, the onus is on you as the draft creator to develop the draft to an acceptable standard. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:04, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

09:24, 11 July 2024 review of submission by Huntere123

[edit]

The submission was declined for unreliable sources, however the main sources used throughout the article are a book from R. P. Hunnicutt's A History of American Armor, which are considered to be a highly reputable source on American armor, and are used throughout other Wikipedia articles on the subject, (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M48_Patton, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M103_heavy_tank etc). The other main source used is various Jane's publications, which are also considered a highly reputable source for information on defense related topics, e.g. armored vehicles, and are also used in other Wikipedia articles on similar topics (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M1_Abrams, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Survivability_Test_Vehicle_(Lightweight) etc). Due to this I am unsure why my submission was declined for the given reason, and any assistance would be appreciated. Huntere123 (talk) 09:24, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Huntere123: Without looking at your sources, the entire History section needs to be broken up into distinct paragraphs. It's borderline-impenetrable as is. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:14, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

09:57, 11 July 2024 review of submission by 103.135.255.194

[edit]

How i got approval this Biography ? 103.135.255.194 (talk) 09:57, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You don't. It has been rejected and will therefore not be considered further. Facebook and Twitter are not reliable sources, and there is nothing to suggest that they are notable. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talkcontribs) 10:09, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

19:32, 11 July 2024 review of submission by Danny8384535

[edit]

how do i add sources? is it like adding citations? Danny8384535 (talk) 19:32, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Danny8384535 Yes. The two terms are broadly interchangeable 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 20:49, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

20:01, 11 July 2024 review of submission by Amirsohelkhan993

[edit]
Amirsohelkhan993 (talk) 20:01, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Amirsohelkhan993:JBW (talk) 20:22, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Amirsohelkhan993 Your attempt at your autobiography has been deleted as unambiguous advertising or promotion 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 20:51, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mahroos Siddiquee Nadim

[edit]

Where is Mahroos Siddiquee Nadim Indian footballer article page ? Sukhi vale (talk) 21:16, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Sukhi vale It is where you left it, presumably, at Draft:Mahroos Siddiquee Nadim 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 21:19, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

how do I add properly please help me Sukhi vale (talk) 21:35, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't start multiple threads on this.
I told you already, it's your job to develop the draft. Currently there is nothing to suggest this person is notable, and until there is, the draft won't be accepted. That's what you need to focus on. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:38, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]