Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2024 January 9

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< January 8 << Dec | January | Feb >> January 10 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


January 9

[edit]

02:37, 9 January 2024 review of submission by Pnianatashakanon

[edit]

Hello,I do wikipedia page for the first time. I need to post this wiki page,cause of copyright infringement. When you search in google for “empirey” you can see another band,and the most reason is that empirey’s song “21/6-76” will be added to Empyray( Armenian group) and it’s copyright infringement , but there is no way to prove this other than a Wikipedia page. I indicated the official Spotify of the empirey group, where there is a biography. I don't understand where the mistake is. Pnianatashakanon (talk) 02:37, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Courtesy link: User talk:Pnianatashakanon § Your submission at Articles for creation: Empirey (January 9) 3 for my existing reply to this question. Bsoyka (t • c • g) 02:44, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Pnianatashakanon: I don't understand where the mistake is. That is exactly why I always advise new editors not to even try to create a new article before they have spent a few months learning how Wikipedia works by making improvements to existing articles. ColinFine (talk) 10:39, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

04:13, 9 January 2024 review of submission by Ingenuityscan

[edit]

I cannot find more reliable reference about the article and I also feel that it is notable topic.please help me to improve the article quality and publish the article Ingenuityscan (talk) 04:13, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ingenuityscan: hospitals are only notable if they satisfy the WP:ORG notability standard. This requires significant coverage, directly of the subject, in multiple independent and reliable secondary sources. If you cannot find such sources, then that suggests this hospital isn't, in fact, notable. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:38, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks for guidance Ingenuityscan (talk) 10:02, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

06:41, 9 January 2024 review of submission by Dr.nassiri

[edit]

I wrote a draft for article about : 'Irys Medical Clinic' but the reviewer found it not neutral. Could you please help me with it? Dr.nassiri (talk) 06:41, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Dr.nassiri: this is one of the reasons why you shouldn't be writing about yourself or your business, because it can be very difficult to write in a neutral, non-promotional manner. One way around this is to forget what you know about the subject, and what you want to say, and instead base your draft purely on what independent secondary sources have said about it. Of course, if you cannot find such sources, which your draft suggests could well be a problem, then you won't be able to lean on them. But then, that also means that the subject isn't notable, and you cannot therefore publish an article on it in any case. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:22, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

10:42, 9 January 2024 review of submission by Bonnychai

[edit]

there is a need to split the article from Karen Mok 

Bonnychai (talk) 10:42, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Bonnychai: that is something that should be first discussed at Talk:Karen Mok, per WP:SPLITTING.
Other than that, do you have a question you would like to ask related to the drafting process? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:46, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
NO Bonnychai (talk) 04:11, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

14:01, 9 January 2024 review of submission by Journalist0071

[edit]

Could you please help review this article? It's my second article on Wikipedia - I would appreciate it :) Journalist0071 (talk) 14:01, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Journalist0071: you have only just submitted it, please be patient; as it says on the top of the draft, reviews can take 2-3 weeks, as we have 900+ other drafts also awaiting review. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:15, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

14:25, 9 January 2024 review of submission by Emi Ciprian

[edit]

Hi there,

I'd like some advice to rewrite the article so it will comply with Wikipedia's policy. As I failed for a number of times to achieve this I am asking for your help. Thank you! Emi Ciprian (talk) 14:25, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Emi Ciprian: this draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. If you wish to rewrite it entirely, that is your call, but as a paid editor the onus is very much on you to understand Wikipedia's policies and publication requirements. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:43, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

14:42, 9 January 2024 review of submission by 2603:9000:5902:E056:91B7:1891:E40D:8BFB

[edit]

Why was this rejected 2603:9000:5902:E056:91B7:1891:E40D:8BFB (talk) 14:42, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because there is no indication that the subject is notable. Wikipedia is not a social media or blogging platform where anyone can write what they want. We are an encyclopaedia, and only publish articles that meet our notability criteria. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:41, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

14:51, 9 January 2024 review of submission by 47.11.206.1

[edit]

Wikipedia is a useful source of background information that Pepole or students often use in the early stages of research.

Wikipedia is a free encyclopedia. So here information is available. But this article not here. This is season. 47.11.206.1 (talk) 14:51, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

15:08, 9 January 2024 review of submission by 47.11.206.1

[edit]

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia written by volunteers to help people gain useful knowledge.

The reason for writing this article is that this post is not on Wikipedia. No such Article. 47.11.206.1 (talk) 15:08, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This was not an article, this was a random collection of unconnected content and general nonsense, presumably only put together so that you can add a spam link to it. And after it was deleted, you went ahead and recreated it. Leave it at that, please, or you will be prevented from editing, for contravening Wikipedia's terms of use. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:26, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

17:16, 9 January 2024 review of submission by Nuashall123

[edit]

Is there any ways to add external link without flagging a spam? I dont know how to use

. If I understand correctly, then I can add external links for promotion? Nuashall123 (talk) 17:16, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nuashall123 Absolutely not. Wikipedia prohibits all forms of promotion, and must not be used as a way to promote topics. Your account will be blocked if you use Wikipedia solely to promote. Qcne (talk) 17:17, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

17:22, 9 January 2024 review of submission by Oysterperpetual36

[edit]

I wonder whether the changes I made, upon the Editor's suggestion, are sufficient to warrant publication or whether I should change something more. Oysterperpetual36 (talk) 17:22, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Oysterperpetual36: the short answer is, the draft has been resubmitted so sooner or alter a reviewer will run the ruler over it, and you will receive feedback (or else it will be accepted without further ado).
The longer answer is, the sources aren't sufficient to demonstrate notability per WP:GNG, therefore you're left with WP:NACADEMIC. If you haven't yet done so, you need to look at that and decide which of the criteria 1-8 you think this person most likely meets, and make sure that you include evidence to support that. It's also not a bad idea to spell out this, so that the reviewer can specifically assess the draft against that particular criterion. HTH, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:27, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
OK! Thanks so much for the swift reply! Oysterperpetual36 (talk) 17:34, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

17:35, 9 January 2024 review of submission by Nuashall123

[edit]

Hi,

I am new to Wikipedia and didn't know that you don't tolerate spam. I wonder if there is still any chance of publishing the article? Can you tell me how to add {{Advert|date=January 2024}}? Thanks! Nuashall123 (talk) 17:35, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. Qcne (talk) 18:30, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

18:46, 9 January 2024 review of submission by Thevikastanwar

[edit]

How Can I make this biographyMore Visible Thevikastanwar (talk) 18:46, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Thevikastanwar: you cannot, because this draft has been rejected and will therefore not be considered further. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:13, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

19:50, 9 January 2024 review of submission by De Catamon

[edit]

I have tried severally to upload this page but it's not working. Right now i don't have any idea on what to do or how to make this page live. De Catamon (talk) 19:50, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:De Catamon was rejected, the draft has zero sources and zero evidence of any notability. Theroadislong (talk) 19:58, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I suggest that you concentrate on your music career and forget about Wikipedia; if you ever merit an article according to the definition of a notable musician, someone will eventually write it. You shouldn't write it yourself, please read the autobiography policy. 331dot (talk) 20:05, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

22:38, 9 January 2024 review of submission by Ceolarisama

[edit]

HiCeolarisama (talk) 22:38, 9 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2024_January_9&oldid=1195723784"