Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 November 23

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< November 22 << Oct | November | Dec >> November 24 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


November 23

[edit]

00:56, 23 November 2023 review of submission by JasonPererafit

[edit]

Is there anything i can do for this? this person is an actor JasonPererafit (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. Not all actors merit Wikipedia articles, see the criteria. 331dot (talk) 01:40, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

04:41, 23 November 2023 review of submission by 2012shahab

[edit]

Kyrgyz International University NRZ is a private university and approved by minstry of science and education kyrgyzstan. 2012shahab (talk) 04:41, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

2012shahab, Draft:Kyrgyz International University NRZ is entirely unreferenced. In its current form, it violates two core content policies, Verifiability and No original research. The draft will never be accepted without adding references. Please study Referencing for beginners. Cullen328 (talk) 04:51, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

05:40, 23 November 2023 review of submission by Cristygarna

[edit]

Why this is not considered for review Cristygarna (talk) 05:40, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cristygarna, Draft:Kallad has not been submitted for review. If you submitted it, it would be promptly declined, because it is unreferenced. Please study Referencing for beginners. Cullen328 (talk) 07:08, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

08:02, 23 November 2023 review of submission by Ghsimr1995

[edit]

I had created an article for Institute of Hospitality, Management and Sciences. It was for informational purposes. But it has been around a month, that article is in draft, and I am not getting any option to submit this article for review. Please help me

Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Institute_of_Hospitality,_Management_and_Sciences 

Ghsimr1995 (talk) 08:02, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Ghsimr1995: the draft had not been submitted, so it would have just sat there in the draft space for six months until deleted. It has been submitted now, and should be reviewed soon. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:13, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like you forgot to add {{subst:submit}} to the top of the draft. I went ahead and submitted it for you. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 08:13, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I got a notification that I have taken monetary benefits to create this article on Wikipedia, but i want to inform that I have not taken any benefits from anyone in any way to create this article. Where i can mention this? Ghsimr1995 (talk) 08:35, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

08:07, 23 November 2023 review of submission by Mdshahinneel7

[edit]

Md Shahin Miah Mdshahinneel7 (talk) 08:07, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mdshahinneel7: you don't ask a question, but this draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. Wikipedia is not for writing about yourself; for that, you'll need to find some social media or blogging platform. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:09, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

08:24, 23 November 2023 review of submission by Grey1092

[edit]

Hello, I want to know how to improve this as I found there are no pages on Wikipedia on Organism 46-B. Some help on how to get this published without it getting rejected would be highly appreciated. Grey1092 (talk) 08:24, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Grey1092: Wikipedia subjects need in-depth coverage (full-length articles, not just passing mentions) in usually at least 3 reliable sources that are not written by or affiliated with the subject.
Wikihow and fandom aren't reliable sources. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 08:36, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much for specifying! I will try to find more reliable sources, but how would I find reliable sources for a conspiracy theory? Grey1092 (talk) 08:39, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Grey1092 That might be difficult. If it's not a widely held theory, there unfortunately might not be enough sources to support a Wikipedia article. See WP:FRINGE. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 08:49, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

09:35, 23 November 2023 review of submission by Auto Muziejus

[edit]

Do i need published sources for wiki page in english, i can add native (Lithuanian) sources? Page is about museum in capital of Lithuania. Auto Muziejus (talk) 09:35, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Auto Muziejus: sources do not have to be in English, as long as they otherwise meet the standard in terms of reliability etc.
I'm assuming, judging by your username, that you have a connection to the subject. This needs to be disclosed. I will post instructions on your talk page. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:42, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
(ec) I would add that what is acceptable on the Lithuanian Wikipedia is not necessarily acceptable here- the English Wikipedia tends to be stricter than others. This museum will need to be shown to meet our definition of a notable organization. 331dot (talk) 09:44, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, i work there, and we want to be on the wikipedias "map". Auto Muziejus (talk) 09:52, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Okay. In that case, please make your paid editing disclosure now. (You probably need to make it on the Lithuanian Wikipedia as well, but I'll leave that between you and them.) -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:56, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

10:26, 23 November 2023 review of submission by SiCebuTransmissionCorrecter

[edit]

I don't have knowledge to know that the article was made in the Philippines, I don't also have news articles found on my search, so sorry, the page was editable so you can correct it. SiCebuTransmissionCorrecter (talk) 10:26, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. If the sources do not exist, no amount of editing can confer notability on a topic. 331dot (talk) 10:27, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

12:48, 23 November 2023 review of submission by TradingSpousesWelsch

[edit]

My article draft was declined with the note "Please ensure you declare any conflict of interest on your user page." I don't have any conflict of interest. I'm in no way associated with the subject of the article and I don't think it's fair my article being declined based on a false accusation. If there's any actual constructive advice I could get on how to improve my draft I will gladly take it, but the editor who declined my article didn't even give any. It's my first article so I just want to learn how to improve it. TradingSpousesWelsch (talk) 12:48, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

TradingSpousesWelsch If you have no conflict of interest, okay, but you tripped an edit filter as a possible COI and wrote in a highly promotional style. One reviewr did leave you extensive advice at the top of your draft. 331dot (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@TradingSpousesWelsch: there was no accusation. The message means if you have a conflict of interest, then make sure to disclose it. If you don't have one, that's great. It's not an unreasonable thing to query, given that your first substantive edit after registering your user account was to create this draft; that does often indicate that the user has some sort of a real life connection with the subject.
In any case, the draft wasn't declined because of a possible COI, it was declined as promotional. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:54, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
How do I make it less promotional? I have an interest hobby-wise in Canadian companies which is why I wrote it, but when doing my research, I couldn't find anything negative or critical about the company. I tried to write it from a neutral point of view and I removed any language that was overly gushy or complimentary of the company. I would be happy to make any further improvements to make it sound less promotional. TradingSpousesWelsch (talk) 12:59, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You have mostly summarized the routine activities of the company (like the opening and closing of locations), which does not establish notability. Please see WP:ORG if you haven't already. Wikipedia needs to summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage choose on their own to say about a business and what makes it important/significant/influential. The vast majority of businesses do not merit Wikipedia articles, just as the vast majority of people do not. 331dot (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@TradingSpousesWelsch Please look at your prose, which is great for a magazine article, but fails for Wikipedia. We need "dull-but-worthy" prose, very flat, totally factual.
Also look at what 331dot has said just above. That comes first, my comment comes second. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 13:09, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

15:40, 23 November 2023 review of submission by Jm33746

[edit]

Hi How do I fix this article to get it approved Jm33746 (talk) 15:40, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the advice left by the reviewer. 331dot (talk) 15:49, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

16:11, 23 November 2023 review of submission by Preksha30

[edit]

I am not able to understand why is this page getting rejected. Preksha30 (talk) 16:11, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As noted by the last reviewer, "This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia." Wikipedia is not a place to just tell the world about someone and their good work. 331dot (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

16:20, 23 November 2023 review of submission by Tarkik King

[edit]

I am Tarkik Bhawsar. I am a professional musician & youtuber. Even google recognizes me. I am requesting this on behalf of @Tarkik Bhawsar vevo Tarkik King (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So which is it? Are you Tarkik Bhawsar or aren't you? In any event, you haven't created a draft. You promoted this person on your user page, which is not permitted. Wikipedia is not a place for people to tell the world about themselves. Please read WP:AUTO. 331dot (talk) 16:23, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

17:20, 23 November 2023 review of submission by Mynulislam44

[edit]

Dear sir please actived my account Mynulislam44 (talk) 17:20, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mynulislam44: this draft has been deleted as promotional; please don't create more of the same.
Your user account is self-evidently active, as you've managed to post this message. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:25, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

18:32, 23 November 2023 review of submission by 182.190.213.219

[edit]

I need help! I have provided many reliable resources but still mods are denying my article please look into those references which clearly prove my given information 😶 182.190.213.219 (talk) 18:32, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's not "mods" or admins declining, just editors. Please heed the advice they have given you. The main issue is that your text is styled and structured as an essay and not an encyclopedia article. 331dot (talk) 21:45, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

21:18, 23 November 2023 review of submission by JimC3930

[edit]

I must not understand the procedure. I want to edit and create Wikipedia pages. It seems I need to do this starting with a sandbox and that I have to publish my sandbox. Is this correct? JimC3930 (talk) 21:18, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You submitted your sandbox for a review as an article draft, but it had no substantive content. You went beyond clicking "publish changes"(which just means "save") It's best to use Article Wizard to create and submit a draft. 331dot (talk) 21:42, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

21:49, 23 November 2023 review of submission by Asianfg

[edit]

I have submitted a new page for review, which I appreciate the reviewer notes that the page does not meet the requirements of NCORP for organisations. Since similar 'organisations' such as the Sydney Youth Orchestra and Adelaide Youth Orchestra have far less details and cited sources, I wonder if I am mis-categorising the Canberra Youth Orchestra as an organisation. Is there another category I should be using? Based on the content of similar youth orchestras would it be better if I reduced the content to a few lines to at least have the page listed that would then allow others to edit/enhace? Asianfg (talk) 21:49, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Asianfg Please read other stuff exists. It could be that these other articles are also inappropriate and just not addressed yet by a volunteer, and you would be unaware of this. As this is a volunteer project where people do what they can when they can, inappropriate articles can get by us. If you want to use other articles as an example or model, use those classified as good articles, which have been vetted by the community.
Are you associated with this orchestra?
Are you writing about the orchestra as an organization or as a musical group, where the relevant criteria is WP:BAND? Wikipedia is not a place to just tell about something and what they do- an article must summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the topic. 331dot (talk) 22:00, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You are free to tell others about the draft for them to edit it, but this is not the process to create a stub. Articles do not need to be complete, but they do need to meet the minimum criteria. 331dot (talk) 22:02, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2023_November_23&oldid=1187420126"