Help desk
< July 7	<< Jun \| July \| Aug >>	July 9 >

Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.

July 8

01:39, 8 July 2023 review of submission by Derivadeb

Derivadeb (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Laura Pinta Cazzaniga (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Laura Cazzaniga and Laura Pinta Cazzaniga she is known as the same person. I need to create a voice Laura Pinta Cazzaniga to redirect to Laura Cazzaniga. Is the same person. Derivadeb (talk) 01:39, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Derivadeb: as was already pointed out when Draft:Laura Pinta Cazzaniga was rejected, redirects from alternative names can only be created once the target article has been published, and Draft:Laura Cazzaniga is still pending review (and won't be accepted as it currently stands, I can tell you that already now). -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:09, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks. if they explain to me what changes to implement I will make them. Derivadeb (talk) 10:54, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not clear how you pass WP:NARTIST? Theroadislong (talk) 11:01, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Creating Articles for Fictional Characters with Social Media Presence

What is the protocol for creating articles for fictional characters on social media?

For example, the Instagram page @Mister_Ratchet is an active blog featuring a fictional character. Similar to characters such as Grumpy Cat, the owner posts on the character's behalf. What are the requirements for notability in this case? OminousOpossum08 (talk) 05:16, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@OminousOpossum08: the requirements are pretty much the same as for anything, namely that the character must meet the WP:GNG notability standard; see WP:FICTION. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:06, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

OminousOpossum08 You might like to look at some examples of articles about fictional characters, such as Spock, Ebenezer Scrooge, Mario, Bowser, Frasier Crane. 331dot (talk) 09:03, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

09:51, 8 July 2023 review of submission by Rohanacharekar1999

Rohanacharekar1999 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Prashant shinde (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

can you please help me out with this artical , i want to know exactly what should i edit Rohanacharekar1999 (talk) 09:51, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is nothing that you can do, the draft was rejected and won't be considered further. Furthermore, it was blatant promotion and deleted as such. 331dot (talk) 09:52, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

16:16, 8 July 2023 review of submission by Mahannobe91

Mahannobe91 (talk · contribs)
- User:Mahannobe91/sandbox (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

you shut the duck up im just a user that design a sandbox page what do you want Mahannobe91 (talk) 16:16, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You submitted it for review as a proposed article, you don't have to submit a sandbox for review. Theroadislong (talk) 16:20, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

17:17, 8 July 2023 review of submission by M.parvage

M.parvage (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Ghulam Sumdany Don (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

This article has lots of reliable sources. But it has been declined. I also updated many sources later, but can't agree with the issue. PARVAGE ^talk! 17:17, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @M.parvage. At the moment I think the article is suffering from Wikipedia:Citation overkill. Ironically this makes it really difficult for editors to actually verify the information in the article draft because there are so many citations.

Instead, please pick out three of the strongest citations that you think are relevant. These three citations must be independent of Ghulam (not an interview, not from his website, etc), they must be independent of each other, they must be secondary, and they must be reliable.

There's also a bunch of non-neutral language in the article (e.g. "sparked his passion", "highly regarded individual"). All Wikipedia articles must be written from a Wikipedia:Neutral point of view. Please read the guide Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words that may introduce bias which explains the type of language and tone we do not expect to see on an article. Qcne (talk) 18:51, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Qcne, Thanks for this wonderful guidance. I edited the article according. Hope it will be accepted soon. But if there still have any issue you found. Please let me know.-- PARVAGE ^talk! 20:42, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you reject my draft?

I created a draft Abdel-Fattah Al-Qadi, but she refused, claiming that she does not achieve notability, I'm surprised by that because this man is one of the most important scholars of Qira'at in the twentieth century

There is an article about him in the Arabic Wikipedia, and all I did was that I translated this article except that I could not put the infobox correctly

أحمد محمد فرج شرف (talk) 20:14, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft only had one source (three times) which doesn't necessarily help illustrate how notable this scholar is. Other Wikipedia's have their own notability guidelines, some stricter than others. See WP:NSCHOLAR for advice on what to improve. It's also best to review machine translations because inaccuracies might occur. Karnataka (talk) 20:30, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @أحمد محمد فرج شرف each language Wikipedia has their own policies and guidelines so an article acceptable in one language may not be acceptable in another and vice versa, with the English Wikipedia generally being the most stringent. Here what is most important is what others have written about a subject, not what the subject has written or said. The draft was declined rather than rejected, meaning you have the opportunity to improve it. I also suggest toning down the peacock language. S0091 (talk) 20:25, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]