Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2023 April 27

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< April 26 << Mar | April | May >> April 28 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


April 27

[edit]

02:30:38, 27 April 2023 review of draft by BP0003

[edit]


Hello, the name of the artist in the wikipedia draft name is misspelled- it should be Kristin Oppenheim. Can you please assist in fixing this error? Thank you.

BP0003 (talk) 02:30, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. --bonadea contributions talk 06:50, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much! BP0003 (talk) 20:42, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

02:37, 27 April 2023 review of submission by Wsjimmys

[edit]

how do i make a better article about myself Wsjimmys (talk) 02:37, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Wsjimmys: you should not be writing about yourself in the first place; see WP:AUTOBIO.
As for writing articles in general, you can find all the advice you need to get started at WP:YFA. The most important thing is to find reliable and independent published sources that demonstrate that the subject is notable, as otherwise there can never be an article on the subject. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:03, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

03:49, 27 April 2023 review of submission by Edna.Arhat

[edit]

Page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ehab_Lotayef

After reviewing Bearcat's comment on the page rejection, I have evaluated the citations used to support the content. Here is a subset of the significant coverage about the subject in reliable independent sources. All of these are mainstream news outlets, and the articles either primarily discuss the subject or he is a significant aspect of the article.

The various aspects of this individual's public life make him a notable Canadian. So I just want better guidance as to how to meet the requirement for it to be published without simply saying "If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia" as the current version has many such references.

sample list: Footnote# / link 2) https://montreal.ctvnews.ca/newsmaker-ehab-lotayef-tried-to-break-gaza-strip-blockade-1.726524 4) https://montrealgazette.com/news/local-news/bridge-building-on-menu-as-westmount-synagogue-hosts-shabbat-evening 10) https://www.theglobeandmail.com/politics/article-canada-urged-to-condemn-egyptian-ministers-remarks-saying-critics/ 11) https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2018/9/25/palestinian-talks-egypt-seeks-to-regain-regional-power 12) https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/mcgill-racial-justice-board-of-governors-1.6028981 17) https://montreal.ctvnews.ca/campaign-against-quebec-s-bill-21-to-launch-1.4578007 Edna.Arhat (talk) 03:49, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Edna.Arhat: the sources you've listed here all offer only passing mentions of Lotayef, mostly where he is commenting on the subject of the article. We don't want to see what he has said, we want to see what others have said about him. Also, the first source is an interview, and interviews are essentially close primary sources as it is the subject speaking.
Also just to clarify that "various aspects of this individual's public life" is not how notability is defined in the Wikipedia context; per WP:GNG, it is defined purely as arising from significant coverage in multiple independent and reliable secondary sources. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:00, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That offers more clarity. Thank you. Edna.Arhat (talk) 13:28, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

05:36:27, 27 April 2023 review of draft by 2402:3A80:A5F:7BED:0:9:8A5D:1

[edit]


The filmography section is error something that having problems please help someone to solve the problems of filmography

2402:3A80:A5F:7BED:0:9:8A5D:1 (talk) 05:36, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I don't understand what you're asking. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:52, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

09:19, 27 April 2023 review of submission by Rameegroupofhotels

[edit]

We need to create page for group of hotels,

Please assist. Rameegroupofhotels (talk) 09:19, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Rameegroupofhotels: the first thing you need to do is to disclose your obvious COI and paid-editing status. Then, you need to change your username. Instructions for both have been posted on your user talk page. That said, you may be blocked soon, if you haven't yet been, and you are then unlikely to be allowed to post more such promotional content. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:24, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

09:56, 27 April 2023 review of submission by DevopsNepal

[edit]

Could you give more insights on why this page is rejected? DevopsNepal (talk) 09:56, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Courtesy link: Draft:Bato - Road to Death
@DevopsNepal: this hasn't been rejected, only declined. The reason was lack of notability, as detailed in the decline notice. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:02, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is a movie in pre production.We have generated the imdb pages and added the media news that are available on internet which are listed in references. First trailer is going to be launched tomorrow. DevopsNepal (talk) 11:20, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@DevopsNepal: okay, and? If the launch is still almost six months away, this is almost certainly a case of TOOSOON; see WP:NFF.
Also, sounds like you may have a conflict of interest. I've posted a message on your user talk page on how to deal with that; please action it promptly.
Finally, when you say "we have generated", that implies your user account is shared. Please note that according to our T&Cs, user accounts are strictly for one person's use only. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:36, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

10:17, 27 April 2023 review of submission by Akbn24

[edit]

Hello everyone, my draft was rejected with the explanatory note that the topic is "not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia". I read the linked article about notability. Here, a rather wide range of possible reasons is given why an article is not approved. Since I have not yet received any further information about what exactly is wrong with my article, I don't know what I have to change in order to meet the Wikipedia standards. I would be very grateful if you could give me some advice on how to proceed. Many thanks in advance! Akbn24 (talk) 10:17, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft was rejected, there is nothing you can do, it was blatant advertising and not notable. Theroadislong (talk) 10:46, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

11:36, 27 April 2023 review of submission by Deepc product

[edit]

I am attempting to create a new page for deepc, a company in the Healthcare AI space . I have added citations from external news sources and trade publications, yet I still get a message that I don't have a third-party reliable sources. I need help getting specific feedback on why my sources (outside of the deepc company website and press releases) are not acceptable. As far as I can see, they meet all of the requirements. Deepc product (talk) 11:36, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Courtesy link: Draft:Deepc
@Deepc product: the sources cited are a mix of routine business reporting, churnalism and primary sources, none of which contribute towards notability per WP:GNG / WP:ORGCRIT. And the draft as a whole is promotional in tone and content, pretty much just WP:ADMASQ. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:07, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

11:37, 27 April 2023 review of submission by Pin.moldova

[edit]

My article was declined because it was not in English, but Romanian. How can I change the language of the page, and get my article approved? Thank you! Pin.moldova (talk) 11:37, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Pin.moldova: "change the language"... you mean translate it? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:44, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't just resubmit it without any improvement. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:45, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
There is no improvement needed. The issue is a technical one, and it is about the language of the page Pin.moldova (talk) 11:47, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
”This is the English language Wikipedia; we can only accept articles written in the English language. Please provide a high-quality English language translation of your submission. Have you visited the Wikipedia home page? You can probably find a version of Wikipedia in your language.”
I need this page to be in Romanian. What are the steps? Pin.moldova (talk) 11:46, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Pin.moldova: I think we're talking at cross purposes. If you "need this page to be in Romanian", then you have to translate it; no one here is going to do that for you.
Just so we're clear, this is the English-language Wikipedia, and we can only accept content in English (as indeed you've just written there yourself). So yes, there is improvement needed, namely this material must be in English, and it isn't, therefore no matter how many times you resubmit it, it won't be accepted. HTH, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:03, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Pin.moldova you're looking for Romanian Wikipedia, which is here: [1] -- asilvering (talk) 04:22, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maximilian Bohl (painter)

[edit]

Draft:Maximilian Bohl (painter) looks dubious to me. Aside from what I write about it here, I am intrigued to read in it that "Around 1910, 27 years old Maximilian became influenced by early works of Virginia Wolf [...]". Such works would have been very early: I believe that Woolf's first book wasn't published till 1915.

However, it's my bed time (and tomorrow promises to be a long day). Over to somebody else. -- Hoary (talk) 13:00, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The sources also don't stack up, and the 'photo' seems dodgy. I've declined it; happy to be proven wrong on this, of course, if someone produces some credible evidence to back it up. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:59, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@Hoary: @DoubleGrazing: Maybe created as some kind of art project? See [2]. --bonadea contributions talk 14:08, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, DoubleGrazing and bonadea. (And pinging Johannes Maximilian and GoingBatty.) I further note that Adeline Virginia Stephen only became Virginia Woolf two years after the year around which our visually reconstructed fellow was, most precociously, being influenced by her works (despite comprehending nothing). A considerable effort to promote Bohl is being made (in both Szczecin and Berlin) by this fellow (Facebook link, sorry). It's all rather confusing. -- Hoary (talk) 22:52, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

13:01, 27 April 2023 review of submission by Bhdgaw,fgjhqewiuefyweo

[edit]

what do i need to add???? Bhdgaw,fgjhqewiuefyweo (talk) 13:01, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Bhdgaw,fgjhqewiuefyweo: If you're talking about Draft:All Mincraft mobs I rejected it because not only is it just listing the various mobs in Minecraft, but it's also an unencyclopedic topic and wouldn't pass AFD regardless. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 13:08, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
e/c Your draft has been rejected it is not a suitable topic for an encyclopaedia and is so poorly spelt as to be largely unintelligible. Theroadislong (talk) 13:10, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"Mincraft"? David10244 (talk) 07:52, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

15:53:41, 27 April 2023 review of draft by Joe minney

[edit]


I started a page called “cleared hot podcast”. I meant to name it “The Coming In Hot Podcast”. How can I edit the name?

Joe minney (talk) 15:53, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's not worth changing because the draft is just advertising and there is no indication of notability. Theroadislong (talk) 15:59, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Too late, moved it already! :) Yes, a bit pointless at this stage, but hey ho.
@Joe minney, it's now at Draft:Coming In Hot. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:01, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. I’m an idiot 😝 Joe minney (talk) 16:24, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

19:57, 27 April 2023 review of submission by Ajosephg

[edit]

The editor refused the article saying it was a 'neologism'...but it has no neologisms in it, so I'm confused. Ajosephg (talk) 19:57, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It surprises me too. But more importantly AngusWOOF also wrote "Please discuss at the talk page for Trinity whether such an article is needed." Thank you for creating Talk:Trinity#Logical_criticisms_of_the_Trinity; now wait for responses there. -- Hoary (talk) 23:51, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
It reads like an WP:XY. I haven't seen the phrase "Logic and the Trinity" in common usage before, so that's why I tagged it as a neologism. It also reads like some essay or research topic. AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 01:12, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2023_April_27&oldid=1152922322"