Help desk
< April 20	<< Mar \| April \| May >>	April 22 >

Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.

April 21

09:10:35, 21 April 2023 review of submission by FT kev

FT kev (talk · contribs)
- Draft:ImDontai (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I have been declined so much that I can't send anymore. It's about a Youtuber, and I need resources but no one really talks about him so I am trying the best that I can to get this posted.

FT kev (talk) 09:10, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@FT kev: if "no one really talks about him", then by definition he isn't notable in Wikipedia terms, and it therefore isn't possible to have an article on him. Hence, why this has been rejected and won't be considered further. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:15, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But if you check his stats and channel, it clearly shows that he is notable. FT kev (talk) 19:29, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@FT kev: please review notability; it says nothing about "stats and channel". This is the end of the road for that draft, I'm afraid. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 19:36, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FT kev, just to add onto what DoubleGrazing has explained, I'll remind you that views, likes, and subscribers do not translate to real world notability per se. My favorite example is Sssniperwolf, who has no article despite 35.5 million subscribers (111th all-time) and nearly 23 billion total views. This page helps to explain what it takes for a YouTuber to be considered notable. Thanks, EDG 543 ^{(message me)} 21:46, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@FT kev A YouTuber might be popular but not notable. David10244 (talk) 10:51, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

13:35:02, 21 April 2023 review of draft by User192828

User192828 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Ge with hook (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

ok so i need help with finding sources to cite on my draft. does anyone know what alphabet could the cyrillic ge with hook be used on? is there the help of someone who could probably have... very good knowledge?

User192828 (talk) 13:35, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@User192828: as I said in response to your previous similar query, cite the source(s) where you got the information that is currently in the draft. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:42, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

15:28:49, 21 April 2023 review of draft by 2601:2C4:4380:9DD0:E905:6160:E0F0:A994

2601:2C4:4380:9DD0:E905:6160:E0F0:A994 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Lancium (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Looking for some additional guidance for the re-written submission. It is a direct copy of content that appears on our Wikitia page, so I'm not sure what else needs to be changes as far as the language reading like an advertisement. Any additional feedback is much appreciated! draft:Lancium

2601:2C4:4380:9DD0:E905:6160:E0F0:A994 (talk) 15:28, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The draft gives no obvious reason why this company should be included in a global encyclopaedia, it just describes a ROTM business that exists and does some stuff. Yet at the same time the tone and content are promotional throughout, especially the 'Solutions' (!) section is pure ADMASQ.

The sources, with the possible exception of the HPC Wire, are just routine business reporting and churnalism, none of which helps to make the company notable in Wikipedia terms, per WP:ORGCRIT.

And needless to say, whether or not an article on this subject has been accepted into some other publication out there is neither here nor there, as they have their policies and requirements, and we have ours. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:13, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for taking the time to respond with more detail! I very much appreciate it. Now, I can put on hold until we have additional sources. Best, Amanda 2601:2C4:4380:9DD0:E905:6160:E0F0:A994 (talk) 13:03, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

22:13:41, 21 April 2023 review of submission by Readerx nk

Readerx nk (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Deraa (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am requesting this re-review cause all wikipedia guide lines have been followed, and a well descriptive article regarding the musician/songwriter deraa created.

Readerx nk (talk) 22:13, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Readerx nk: this draft has been rejected and will not be reviewed again; self-evidently not all guidelines had been followed. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:37, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]