Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 December 7

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< December 6 << Nov | December | Jan >> December 8 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


December 7

[edit]

08:48:17, 7 December 2022 review of draft by Ggsilverscreeneditor

[edit]


I'm unsure if I successfully submitted my draft. Does everything look correct?

Ggsilverscreeneditor (talk) 08:48, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@ggsilverscreeneditor: yeah, the draft is submitted. one comment: imdb is not reliable, see WP:IMDB. lettherebedarklight晚安 08:51, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Is WorldCat reliable? Ggsilverscreeneditor (talk) 08:53, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@ggsilverscreeneditor: do you want to cite a book? use {{cite book}}. lettherebedarklight晚安 09:00, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ggsilverscreeneditor WorldCat is just a database, a library catalogue if you like; it merely provides bibliographical information. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:01, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 11:49:22, 7 December 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by Balchanamakowcbombe

[edit]



Balchanamakowcbombe (talk) 11:49, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Balchanamakowcbombe: you don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected. As I mentioned already, Wikipedia is not social media, so please don't use it as such. Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:57, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

12:00:23, 7 December 2022 review of submission by Balchanamakowcbombe

[edit]


Balchanamakowcbombe (talk) 12:00, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply] 

so how can i use it
You can't, if all you are doing is promoting yourself. Theroadislong (talk) 12:14, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

14:44:33, 7 December 2022 review of draft by Hamzamkf

[edit]


Hi there,

Please can someone help me to disambiguate the word of Reggio and fix this article to be published, many thanks!

Best,

Hamzamkf (talk) 14:44, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Hamzamkf: you needn't worry about the disambiguation yet, that's only relevant if/when the draft is accepted. For now, your main concern should be establishing notability, which on a quick glance seems borderline at best.
Also, you need to cite your sources inline, so that it's clear which source supports what information, and how much of the content remains unsupported. Piling all your cites at the end like that will be an immediate cause for declining. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:51, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there,
Thank you so much for your quick reply very appreciated, I did my best to resolve all you mentioned but as a beginner its a bit difficult so please if there someone who can help me to fix that I'll be grateful.
Thanks, Hamzamkf (talk) 15:02, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

15:03:39, 7 December 2022 review of draft by Waimea92

[edit]


Hi, I have a couple of questions. In terms of reliable sources, are newspaper sites the only acceptable sources? With reference to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karthik_(singer), I see that many other references, even facebook link, are accepted as references. Please clarify.

Also, how do I add background information to the article? Thanks.

Waimea92 (talk) 15:03, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Waimea92: no, newspapers aren't the only reliable sources, nor are all newspapers reliable. And the same goes for pretty much any type of source you care to mention: books, TV programmes, magazines, etc. - some are reliable, some aren't. Some are reliable for certain types of information, but not for other types. Some used to be reliable but have since relaxed their journalistic standards, or vice versa. You can read more about the concept of reliable sources at WP:RS, and see a list of sources that have been deemed reliable or not at WP:RSP. User-generated content such as social media cannot be relied upon, as anyone can post pretty much anything they want.
As for your other question, what do you mean by 'background information'? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:11, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks @DoubleGrazing. I was referring to photo, birth date, and other personal information shows up in the right side of the article. Waimea92 (talk) 01:55, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Waimea92: you probably mean the infobox, see Template:Infobox person. Be careful, though, if you add personal information such as DOB, this must be clearly supported by reliable published sources, otherwise it actually makes your draft less likely to be accepted. Similarly, the photo must have a suitable licence, so you don't violate anyone's copyright. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:45, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 18:06:20, 7 December 2022 for assistance on AfC submission by RRSHOPPEE

[edit]



RRSHOPPEE (talk) 18:06, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What is your question, @RRSHOPPEE? This draft is not viable, as there is barely any content, and no references. Please see WP:YFA for advice. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 18:19, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

23:52:58, 7 December 2022 review of submission by Carrieruggieri

[edit]


Carrieruggieri (talk) 23:52, 7 December 2022 (UTC)Hi[reply]

Accelerated Experiential Dynamic Psychotherapy

The AEDP article that was on the main page is not taken down and can be found here: AEDP draft is in Carrieruggieri/accelerated experiential dynamic psychotherapy ==

Please help me improve the AEDP article. It was deleted from the main space and put into the above user account. The issues that need attention are: weasel words: non-committal statements not backed up by reference; essay style, not encyclopedic style: too much explanation, not enough summary. Apparently, the map of change process appears to be a 'how to'. The style also appears to be promotional. The content however, is thorough and well documented by non-primary sources. A editor does not need to know the content area in order to fix the problems or make suggestions to me. Thank you to anyone willing to help make this a good article for wikipedia. @WikiprojectPsychology Carrieruggieri (talk) 23:46, 7 December 2022 (UTC) Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Psychology23:52, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@carrieruggieri: what? accelerated experiential dynamic psychotherapy was redirected to Diana Fosha after the discussion on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Accelerated experiential dynamic psychotherapy. none of this is related to drafts. lettherebedarklight晚安 06:20, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't understand. I the articles for deletion discussion was from 2017. That article was "blown up" and completely redone. This aedp article under consideration was published in 2020 and in Nov. 2022 it was moved to Diana Fosha. Carrieruggieri (talk) 17:04, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Carrieruggieri Sorry that you don't understand, but what you say is correct: as a result of the discussion that lettherebedarklight linked above, from Nov. 2022, the article title was turned into a redirect to the Diana Fosha article. The linked discussion might help if you haven't read it yet. David10244 (talk) 07:05, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I cannot find that discussion. the discussion lettherebedarklight is from 2017. I can'd find the 2022 discussiion Carrieruggieri (talk) 12:44, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It was re-directed in 2017 and then it was re-written and republished in 2020. the conversation is regarding the 2017 version, not the 2020 version. But maybe its the same issues. Nevertheless, I am working on it and have requested help or take-over from wiki psych. Carrieruggieri (talk) 14:20, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I had my dates wrong. Thanks. David10244 (talk) 12:16, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2022_December_7&oldid=1127144339"